tarunexports
02 February 2012 at 13:42
Dear Experts, The undersigned is an RTI activist and is following stone crushers violation of pollution norms. One of the carriers of these Stone crushers have lodged one criminal complaint against undersigned of a cheque signed, issued and given by undersigned son(who is settled in USA) way back in 2008.The undersigned has neither signed nor has any liability towards this carrier. The Complainant has made me the only party.
Kindly suggest/advice the steps & measures to be taken by undersigned to save his honour & name from the stigma of a cheque bouncer.
thanks in advance
harinder dhingra
YOGESHWAR.
02 February 2012 at 13:38
I have posed this question in a ongowing case still no final decison.
I present this for the opinion of experts.
1) Cheque is a piece of paper issued by a bank to the account holder for which banks keep records but not traceable.
2) Cheques does not have any security identity and and can not be separated from a computer generated similar piece.
Accused has denied the cheque , signature and its bounce.
Anonymous
02 February 2012 at 10:22
Me and wife got divorced last decemeber but she continue troubling me in all possible ways. She has now given a complaint in local police station that somebody is calling her 100 times everyday and she doubt it could be me.
Police , instead of enquiring me , they called up my HR . I got a warning from HR saying that I should not trouble her but the matter of fact is that I dint even try to contact her or do anything. I am not able to live at peace ... I am very much troubled even after divorce for the sole intention of getting me fired from my job.
How should I approach this issue ? I need to make sure I take her legally and protect the dignity of life. Please help me experts.
Abhay johri
01 February 2012 at 23:34
Sir,
As I am not involve in IT crime and even police didn'nt get any evidence against me but i am a service provider. they got my bill and my preseance at that place, they make me helper in crime, and collect all evidances which make sure that main criminal is some other person even case from in such a way that i have taken an amt of 13cr. or above by makeing telephone exchange and they didn'nt get even 13000 in my account and in that duration even no property deal. loan's and other things are traced even NPA CC a/c of only 1 lackh. and on that criminal they got several property above than 100cr. and criminal records. they decleared him farar and send me on jr.
now after completion of six yr. they are not submitting charge sheet. i am on bail , i have to go to court every 1 or 2 month 4 giving my preseance. what can i do,
even i have apply to jude for considering my case they issue 3 time notice for police dept. to submmit report. they are intrested in geting 10 lack. and i am not capable b'coz i didn'nt earn so much even from that client i earned only approx 1300 in 4 months with matterial supplied.Even as i came to now from my advocate that from h.court they enquir from gwalior with matterial and facts collected by police. the computer system with telephone exchange and the billing address and amt payed by and the data collected by that compter system. some Govt concern give report that "Abhay johri" my self have no envolvment in that(report ask by jablpur high court) on this basis they give me bail
what can i do
anand bhaskar burhade
01 February 2012 at 23:11
hubby favoured 2 judjements,1-s-9 restitution,filed by wife dissmissed,2- s-13,1 (i-a)cruelty filed by hubby,qurry- wife filed complaint case u/s- 498-a,323,34 ,investigation us-156-3 ,crpc,clubbed with charge sheet,if summon issued but yet not recieved all accussed,returned back not compliance for genuine reason,all vegue facts , if accusses wants to get read of it,if not considered in 482 crpc ,what is real reamedy if accussed do not want to defend metter by getting bail
Anonymous
01 February 2012 at 21:25
Hi,
Is it mandatory for the accused to be present in court on the day of arguments between 2 lawyers(opposite party and my lawyer) ?
Is it mandatory for the accused to be present in court on the day of judge giving final verdict ? if judgement is expected to be in our favour ?
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
01 February 2012 at 20:39
i am the member of swetcha educational society .our society president and secretary both intentionally deleted my name (vice president)and joint secretary name from the society.and submitted to registrar of society ,hyd.forged resignation letters are submitted to the registrar ,hyd. i know the facts recently .i approched the registrar of the societies and certyfied copies of forged society (deleted) and initial society copies are recieved.and the case was registered u/s ipc 420,464,468,506 .the investigation has been started ,but the police are supporting to the accused persons.they got bail also.AT THIS STAGE WHAT CAN I DO? WHAT LEGAL STEPS I HAVE TO TAKEN?AND I WANT TO FILE A PETITION TO THE REGISTRAR FOR MY FORGED RESIGNATION LETTERS.NOW PLS EXPLAIN THE PROCEDURE FOR PETITION.AND ANY REGISTRATION ACT SECTIONS APPLICABLE TO THE ACCUSED PERSONS.thanking you sir.
Anonymous
01 February 2012 at 19:58
is there any provision in law which enables the complainant to appoint an advocate to argue in court at the stage of remand,bcoz PP IS not putting all the facts to the court and try to protect accused person.pls tell me the judgement also if any .
Anonymous
01 February 2012 at 19:07
W, a wife gets an ex parte decree of divorce, on ground of adultery that her husband has illicit relations with his bhabhi; w deposes specifically that she saw him with his bhabhi on one occasion. Bhabhi is made respondent no.2 alongwith the husband, but is subsequently given up by W.
Ex parte decree is passed. It is never challenged.
Then, bhabhi files a criminal complaint for defamation saying that her reputation has been maligned.
W takes the defence that the allegations were made merely for protection of her interest and not for maligning the reputation of Bhabhi, and that her case is governed by exception 9 of S.499 IPC.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ipc case
IPC 395 was booked on one share holder A by another share holder B of the same company related to the company owned car.
A has been running that car as he is the share holder of the company for over 15 years, he also has the car service receipts which he has been getting done for years and other documents related to the car. (Hence it looks like a false case) But when the car was bought the company was a firm at that time with A & B being partners and B's name was written in the registration paper as the under taking person.
QUESTIONS:
1) Is this case even maintainable?
2) if so, then why?
3) Is B the true owner of the car or the Firm which is now a company?
4) What does under taking imply legally?
5) Under what act & Section it is written that who is the owner of the assest (car) in such a situation?