GANGAM.RAJENDER.
01 February 2012 at 17:24
i am the member of swetcha educational society .our society president and secretary both intentionally deleted my name (vice president)jaint secretary name from the society.and submitted to registrar of society ,hyd.fotged resignation letters are submitted to the registrar ,hyd. i know the fact recently .i approched the registrar of the society and certyfied copies of forged society (deleted) and initial society copies are recieved.and the case was registered u/s ipc 420,464,468,506 .the investigation has been started ,but the police are supporting to the accused persons.they got bail also.AT THIS STAGE WHAT CAN I DO? WHAT LEGAL STEPS I HAVE TO TAKEN?AND I WANT TO FILE APETITION TO THE REGISTRAR FOR MY FORGED RESIGNATION LETTERS.NOW PLS EXPLAIN THE PROCEDURE FOR PETITION.AND ANY REGISTRATION ACT SECTIONS APPLICABLE TO THE ACCUSED PERSONS.thanking you sir.
Anonymous
01 February 2012 at 17:06
When a person writes a book offending the
religious sensibilities of a community what is the course of action against him.
Does it matter about whether he belongs to the same religion or belongs to a different religion?
vinod bansal
31 January 2012 at 22:20
R/Experts
A person namely Suresh was having grudge against another person namely Ramesh s/o Satbir R/o Assandh ,Suresh with the help of his servent namely krishan hatched a conspiracy and Krishan was apprehended having illicit liquor by police and a crl case under excise act was registered by police against above krishan but it is pertinent and interesting to mention here that before police accused krishan disclosed his name as Ramesh s/o satbir R/o Assandh and police challaned him ,accused was released by police on police bail and above suresh stood surety for accused,later on case was compouded by depositing compounding amount and accused was discharged by DETC.After some time when Ramesh s/o satbir R/o Assandh went to SP office for renewal of his Arms Licence ,he stunned after came to know that as per police verification report a crl case was got registered against him,he made a complaint and now police registered FIR against suresh and krishan uss 420/34 IPC i want to know whether FIR under these sections is correct or other sections are applicable in these given facts.As i discussed with Ramesh ,by impersonation this case by registered due to enimity in between suresh and ramesh and suresh lodged this case only with a thought that after lodging of this false FIR Ramesh will never succeed in getting a government Job.Kindly advice regarding proper /correct sections of IPC in given facts.Regards
Anonymous
31 January 2012 at 10:52
a buyer named "venathagarments" formaly known as "shirnkage fashion" its firm having two partners. in their web site their name & style denote as above address is one and the same. purchased goods as per purchase order of "venathagarments"and issued cheque from "shrinkage fashion" and the cheque was bounced notice issued to said name & style as its and return unserved even intimation given. the magistrate Court needs citation to admit the case. pl sr. experts may advise for any citation regarding this matter
Anonymous
31 January 2012 at 10:22
Dear Sir,
I came across a strange incident/case. i need help of experts.
I have lended money to a person few months back. At the time of repayment he gave me a cheque to present in the bank. He signed that cheque before me only. when i presented it in bank it got bounced.
when i enquired i came to know that the cheque does not belong to the person who gave me. it belongs to some xyz. This is nothing but cheating. When i enquired in my circle i came to know that the person who gave me cheque is a litigant person.he is permanent resident of my place only. he is working in a private firm.
now i need help of experts how to approach and resolve my problem
can i file a cheque bounce case ?
is there any other way i can teach lesson to this litigant person ?
V R SHROFF
31 January 2012 at 08:53
I sold my used car, to one car mechanic
He paid me fully, taken delivery, signed it
He said, he will transfer it, after painting and repairs, after 15 days.
It also have "Advocate High Court" Logo on it.
My Question is, As Registration on my name until transfer, will I be Liable for any accident. illegal items found in car or used for any illegal, immoral purpose till it get transferred?
I signed and deliver all transfer Doc, but he did not put date or purchaser's name, which he said will put as and when he sell it within 15 days.
Any Advocate having dealt such case, experienced in this field dealing with Vehicle may kindly suggest me, if any action required to be taken, or and any risk involved??
Arvind Singh Chauhan
31 January 2012 at 08:36
Whether same court can adopt two contradictory view on the same issue on different matters-
In one court says- employee who are employed on contract basis are not public servant and is not able to get the benefit of sanction required by 197 Cr.P.C. and convicts them.
In another one, court on the FIR of employee who are employed on contract basis, framing charge of 332, 353 on the accused.
Please refer citation if any in favour of accused in second case.
Anonymous
31 January 2012 at 01:41
Sir,
In 1983 a partner of a firm came to boss (senior advocate) of my companion advocate here i refer him Mr. 'X' advocate, telling that his firm is a tenant of a premises and the landlord had refused to receive the rent. Then his boss asked 'X' to deposit the rent as per rent control law. As his directions 'X' placed an application along with his vakalatnama before the court. And deposited the rent in the court under his own signature.
In 1986 both the parties came to a settlement and raising the rent they agreed a new tenancy started in the same name of tenant firm.
Now in 2006 the landlord came to mr. 'X' advocate to file a civil suit for eviction against that tenant firm. Due to passing a long time, He had forgotten that he ever deposited the rent in the court on behalf of the tenant. So he filed a civil suit of eviction on behalf of landlord against the said tenant firm.
Now the case is on stage of plaintiff's evidence.
Meanwhile! In 2012 the tenant has filed a complaint in Bar showing that Mr. 'X' the advocate has committed a serious professional misconduct.
I have suggested mr X to withdraw his Vakalatnama at-once from the court without referring any reason.
Now I want to know here--
1-Whether this situation comes in the ambit of Professional misconduct??
2-Depositing rent is a miscellaneous proceeding, can it be conceded as Mr. X advocate has briefed on behalf of an party previously and now subsequently he could not brief against that tenant?
3-Is passing a long time could be a defense?
4-Withdrawal of Vakalatnama could favor him?
5-Could the situation in which both the parties came to an compromise and since they recommenced the new tenancy in 1986, be the defense?
Any other advice..
Plz If anyone have any Judgment??
Ravikant Soni
31 January 2012 at 01:39
Plz refer if have any Judgment??
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Forfeiture of property - bona fide transferee
X purchased a house following all the legal procedures and it later came to light that he had purchased it after the issue of freezing order by NDPS authorities but before its forfeiture. As it is practically not possible to go to each and every dept. to find out abt such freezing orders, would it not be unfair if the house is forfeited from an innocent citizen whose only fault is that he lacked clairvoyance!