Deepak Nair
09 January 2012 at 15:46
Dear Sirs,
I have been searching for the provisions related to employment of Personsn with Disabilities with regards to Private Sector Employer.
But, I could not find any related provisions in the Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and
Full Participation)Act 1995 and Rules 1996. All the provisions in the above Act and Rules are with regards to the employment of such persons in government & public sector undertakings through employment exchange etc.
I request the ld. experts to advise me with regards to the followings.
1. Is the said Act appicable to private sector?
2. If the private sector employer employs any person with disability, then what are the rules and regulations which they need to follow?
3. Is there any regulation which says that if any such person is employed, then the said employment shall be reported to any concerned authority?
Kindly give your views, as a private sector company is desirous of appointing some persons with disability in its customer care unit.
Anonymous
09 January 2012 at 14:12
Dear Experts,
I have posted similar query before as well however guess did not post it precisely. As per the Air Force policy deserter get dismissed after 3 years of absence. we all know that dismissal is one of the most severe punishment given to the defence personnel.
if the personnel has not committed any serious offence and has not deserted with any arms and ammuniation than only he get dismissed from the service after 3 years of desertion. if personnel has deserted after commiting any serious offence or with service arms and ammuniation he would not be dismissed.
My question is when Air Force Act says that the personnel has been dismissed after 3 years of desertion and he has not deserted with any arms and ammuniation or after committing any serious offence... than why do they have to punish the personnel again...one of the section of Air Force Act also that deserter when apprehended/surrender may be punished again.
It means that once personnel is already punished for being deserter for 3 years and if found again he must be punished again. this means that defence personnel get punished more than 1 time for same offence. ( I only refer to those deserters who has not deserted with arms and ammuniation and has not committed any serious offence).
I request the opinion of the emminent lawyers and defence experts. This would be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Member (Account Deleted)
08 January 2012 at 23:40
What all conditions are to be satisfied to allow commercial use of govt buildings? Who is the competent auth for central govt buildings? Who is the competent auth to fix rents ?
Is the rule same for all locations or it is location specific?
And in which head or fund the rent be deposited?
Member (Account Deleted)
08 January 2012 at 23:31
What is the rule position for allowing manufacturers/Dealers to advertise of govt lands and boundary walls?(Central Govt offices).
Member (Account Deleted)
08 January 2012 at 23:24
On a date when Magistrate is on leave and no reliever is arranged who is delegated in that court to give next date and based on which parameters? Is there a procedures that information is to be made available to those accused, witnesses etc so that they are not unnecessarily inconvenienced?
Anonymous
08 January 2012 at 20:57
Dear Emminent Lawyers,
I have just seen one of the anonymous blog and was trying to help that person. however since I am not a LLB or experience into Defence Law, I am unable to help that anonymous person.
This is the case of deserters in Defence i.e. Army/Airforce/navy as per the policy, Air force dismiss the personnel after 3 years of desertion. It is also mentioned that Dismissal is one of the most severe punishments given by court martial(court of airforce/army). however it seems that even after the dismissal the personnel can not lead a normal life. in this case the deserter's NOK is also given the Dismissal order that clearly states that the personnel has deserted without any arms and ammuniation and committing any serious offence.
The point here is since the personnel is already dismissed for being deserter for 3 years and has not deserted with arms and ammuniation and has not committed any serious offence. How can the personnel can be punished again for the same crime?
if this is the rule than there must be some genuine exceptions to it... request the help of experts...
eagerly waiting to hear from the emminent lawyers ...
Regards,
MD JAMAL MUSTAFA
08 January 2012 at 18:57
Is X elegible for the post of ADJ who has joined as a legal manager/ legal officerin Nationalized Bank (PNB) after completion of more than seven years experience at the Bar as a practicing Advocate.He is also above 35 years and below 40 years.
Anonymous
08 January 2012 at 12:08
We want to do facebook election campaign.
is it come under law? or we face
acharsanhita problem.
pls give us suggetion. its urgent for us.
Member (Account Deleted)
07 January 2012 at 11:20
I believe post independence it was Jury system in vogue in this country.What happened ? Why it was changed to the present system which has collapsed (almost)?Why JURY system is not being re-introduced? Who will benefit and who shall loose and in what way? How this Jury system is being practised to perfection by our colonial masters as well as USA and such others developed countries? are YOURLORDSHEEPS the bottlenecks ? Or are the lawyers themselves are the roadblocks? Can someone provide some honest answers?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Anti-suit injunction
under what conditions can an anti-suit injunction be granted?