MJS Murthy
16 January 2012 at 11:24
When PIL is filed in a High Court, is it necessary that only Chief Justice of the High Court should hear before admitting the case.
Whether Chief Justice can dismiss the case even before admitting PIL without assigning any reasons.
jeevan deshpande
14 January 2012 at 13:35
dear sir, i am working in a pvt company. want to start celebration of Republic Day and Independence Day. you are requested pl guide for handling of national flag on those occasion. As we general/common citizens allow to celebrate flag ceremony ? what will be timing for morning and evening.
Anonymous
11 January 2012 at 17:40
Dear Experts,
1) Advocates are not allowed freedom to advertise their profession. Is it not effecting their rights under Article 19(1)(a) and (g)?
2) Advocates are not allowed freedom to pursue another profession in addition to advocacy. Is it not effecting their rights under Article 19(1)(g). Those doing government service are not allowed another profession is understandable since State is providing sufficient salary and related service benefits. But advocates are not getting any such financial support from State. Every advocate is not doing roaring practice, and this restriction on additional profession is leading to succumb to various compromises, hardships, malpractices in many advocates.
If these restrictions are violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and (g), it is surprising why advocates have not taken up this matter in a strong manner?
Anonymous
10 January 2012 at 20:45
Hello
one thing i want to know that, why most of the ACT 'S are not applicable to jammu & kashmir ?
SATISH CHANDRAN
10 January 2012 at 10:14
What is the overall view on Whistle blowers protection Act 2011?
Is there any provision reg the persons making false allegations?
Anonymous
09 January 2012 at 23:34
under what conditions can an anti-suit injunction be granted?
Deepak Nair
09 January 2012 at 15:46
Dear Sirs,
I have been searching for the provisions related to employment of Personsn with Disabilities with regards to Private Sector Employer.
But, I could not find any related provisions in the Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and
Full Participation)Act 1995 and Rules 1996. All the provisions in the above Act and Rules are with regards to the employment of such persons in government & public sector undertakings through employment exchange etc.
I request the ld. experts to advise me with regards to the followings.
1. Is the said Act appicable to private sector?
2. If the private sector employer employs any person with disability, then what are the rules and regulations which they need to follow?
3. Is there any regulation which says that if any such person is employed, then the said employment shall be reported to any concerned authority?
Kindly give your views, as a private sector company is desirous of appointing some persons with disability in its customer care unit.
Anonymous
09 January 2012 at 14:12
Dear Experts,
I have posted similar query before as well however guess did not post it precisely. As per the Air Force policy deserter get dismissed after 3 years of absence. we all know that dismissal is one of the most severe punishment given to the defence personnel.
if the personnel has not committed any serious offence and has not deserted with any arms and ammuniation than only he get dismissed from the service after 3 years of desertion. if personnel has deserted after commiting any serious offence or with service arms and ammuniation he would not be dismissed.
My question is when Air Force Act says that the personnel has been dismissed after 3 years of desertion and he has not deserted with any arms and ammuniation or after committing any serious offence... than why do they have to punish the personnel again...one of the section of Air Force Act also that deserter when apprehended/surrender may be punished again.
It means that once personnel is already punished for being deserter for 3 years and if found again he must be punished again. this means that defence personnel get punished more than 1 time for same offence. ( I only refer to those deserters who has not deserted with arms and ammuniation and has not committed any serious offence).
I request the opinion of the emminent lawyers and defence experts. This would be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Member (Account Deleted)
08 January 2012 at 23:40
What all conditions are to be satisfied to allow commercial use of govt buildings? Who is the competent auth for central govt buildings? Who is the competent auth to fix rents ?
Is the rule same for all locations or it is location specific?
And in which head or fund the rent be deposited?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Right of privacy
Don't I have right of privacy over my own information? Like my election identity card number, name, age, sex, father's/husband's name, address?
If one refers to the attachment below with this query, all these ingredients of information required for starting the process of identity theft or impersonation have been put up by the Election Commission.
Why should ANYONE and EVERYONE have the right to know about my above information? If some criminal is tracking anybodies whereabouts, he can easily find it and create misery.
Can writing to the Election Commission help? Or a writ be moved for this in matter of protecting privacy? Instead of putting up all this surplus information which is open for misuse, the Election Commission can instead put up the slip number of voter registration for the applicant to see if the voter registration is done or not done. After all this is the ultimate aim of putting up this entire information.