Ranganath
27 May 2012 at 14:27
Ld Counsels,
My application to amend pleading in my divorce petition and application to sub-poena documents where not considered and kept on hold, for more than six month by family court.
Can I file a common CRP to get direction to dispose of both the applications or do I nee dto file seperate CRPs each for each interim applications.
Thanks.
amitoj
25 May 2012 at 17:03
What is Broadcasting Authority Of India? Any Information Regarding it
Rajesh Kumar Garg
24 May 2012 at 12:45
HON'BLES= IF AN ADVOCATE (ADVOCATE AND GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNY OF HIS WIFE) FILES A SUIT BY PREPARING HIMSELF FAKE DOCUMENTS AND DECEIT THE COURT-1.WHAT SAYS THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDIA ?,2.WHAT TYPE OF ACTION MAY BE AGAINST HIM ?
bhima balla
22 May 2012 at 20:44
Dear experts, How can we file mandamus writ?kindly let me know the entire process and it's effects. Can one file mandamus writ in high court to speed up trial in a criminal case in the trial court? What if the trial procedure is still delayed violating the orders of the mandamus writ? What recourse does one have? Thanks!
bhima balla
22 May 2012 at 19:28
Dear experts .can you please explain different mandamus writs available in INdia?
Is preemptory mandamus writ valid?
udayan
21 May 2012 at 16:07
In doctrine of merger, the order of lower court merges into higher courts judgement.If the higher court doesn't discuss all the points discussed all the points which are there in lower courts judgement,what happens to points which are not discussed are they still good law or not? urgent plz help
Member (Account Deleted)
19 May 2012 at 15:51
Can the Speaker of the Assembly,declare that the State Govt.has been illegally constituted and hence dismiss it?
A.K.Maitra
amit
19 May 2012 at 14:50
Sir.
I received a mail from friend.PL advise me if i should also become party to the cause.Does it hold any merit and can be legally contested.THE MAIL IS AS FOLLOWS-
i would like to bring in notice of all SSC(Short service commission) offrs who are planning to give exam;
1. The cut off age to join army is 25 yrs and of CPO and State police Is 28 yrs.With min 5 yrs of service(a requirement as UPSC to appear in exam) CPO/ police offrs attain age of 33 yrs and have oppotunity to give exam twice with age bar ie 35 yrs.
2. where as an army offr being 10 yrs mandatory to serve (army rule say after 10yr SSC offr can look for alternate option)is at disadvantage as his age will be 34 or 35 when he is eligible,so he is automaticaly written off.Even if regular offr say he joined at age of 21 and board for colonel promotion will be held at 15 yrs of service will attain age of 36 yrs ....which make him ineligible if he requiring the QR of being superseeded(army rule say REGULAR COMMISION OFFICER can look for outside job ONLY when superseeded for promotion or medically unfit).
Hence it is recommended that case to be taken up like 22 cases already taken up by state polce offrs and CPO to increase age limit,from army offrs too.
4. all those offrs desirious of joining can even now be party to a case pending at delhi high cout by other C.P.O officers.Its not expensive and neither time consuming.
One just need to give a copy of Army Order and letter of MS7 to advocate,filing case under violation of art 16 violation of righ of equal opportunity.
Only those offrs will be benefitted for next years who are party to case in high court so please expediate your action before too late.
5.Possible fall out will be either the age limit will be enhanced or army will be asked to permit even regular officers to appear in exam.
PLEASE RECOMMEND AND GUIDE FOR SUITABLE COURSE OF ACTION.
REGARDS.
raghavendra
18 May 2012 at 23:19
sir,
i have applied for the civil judge exam ,but my application is rejected with reason that i have not enclosed the character certificate which is issue collage, but i have enclosed the character certificate ,
now what is your suggestion to me to get remedy ,
can i take the help of RTI act to get inforamation ? what else advice ?
thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Competency of tribunal to limit the scope of a verdict.
I have got an interesting issue.
I had applied to the PSC for the post of assistant against vacancy in various departments. I had shown priority to a particular department. I belong to OBC. I was selected under unreserved category. There was no vacancy against general merit quota, but there were vacancies in OBC. I was not allotted to that department as I was not selected under OBC. I approached Tribunal which allowed my application and I was permitted to migrate to my OBC quota.
The verdict squqrely apply to my friends case. He made a representation to PSC to apply the ratio of my judgment to his case. The PSC endorsed that since the judgment expressly stated that the ruling therein applies to the case on hand and future cases and the cases decided already need not be reopened.
Now my question is:
1. Can a High court or Tribunal ever direct that the ratio of its judgment shall not be applied to other cases?
I have come across a decision rendered by the High court of Karnataka in 1987 or 1988, that every one who is similarly situated person need not rush to the court of law and the fruits of the verdict shall be applied to all similarly situated persons. Unfortunately I could not lay my hands.
Will anybody help me. My lawyer says, there is no limitation for approaching the tribunal.