DEEP
08 June 2012 at 19:36
Sir,
Recently the upsc has conducted a limited exam for selection to the IPS for which Asst Commandant/Dy Commandant of CPO'S, DSP's of State Police Services and Capt/Major of Army are eligible.The Govt has accorded reservation as per governmental policy in the selection process.I would like to know whether reservation for sc/st/obc in this case can be challenged, since all the officers who have appeared for this exam have completed minimum 5 years service as Group A Gazetted officers, and are not economically,socially or educationally backward.
pratik
08 June 2012 at 01:00
Meaning of erie doctrine & where it is applicable in india.
any case on it.
pratik
08 June 2012 at 00:52
Artilce 18. Abolition of titles.-
(1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.
(3) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.
(4) No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.
Question: Meaning Of Titles in the above metioned artilce. any example so do understnad it more properly.
smruthi
05 June 2012 at 15:25
sir/ madam,
my friend is an O.B.C candidate which comes under 3(b). she has contested in panchayat raj election & won. now some people are objecting that her spouse income is 2.5 lakh/annum. so she should not eligible to hold the power. is there any such rules regarding to this? please do reply as early as possible.
thanks & regards,
smruthi
raghavendra
05 June 2012 at 15:04
sir,
can any one here give me karantaka judicial service recruitment rules..
thanking you
sandeep sangwan
03 June 2012 at 12:53
Is protection under article - 20, is applicable in both cases (criminal or civil),
and can court compel any body to give evidence, if no then whats the matter in N.D.TIVARI case. i don't understand? plz help me.
Kailash Bhanushali
01 June 2012 at 11:29
What can one do if he is falsely arrested under section 151.can he complaint against the police officer.My freind was arrested on 30 may 2012 about 22.15 and charged section 151 and falsely charged by the section.Where shud he complaint if he was not eligible under such section.
SRIPRAKASH BHATTACHARYA
31 May 2012 at 14:19
16.09.2009
RE-POSTED AGAIN ON 31.05.2012
DEAR SIRS,
OURS IS LARGE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY HAVING 264 MEMBERS. WE ARE COVERED BY THE WBCS ACT, 1983(NOW 2006) AND WBCS RULES, 1987(NOW 2011). EVERY THREE (NOW FIVE YEARS) WE HAVE A NEW BOARD COMPRISING OF SIX DIRECTORS AND DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED BY GENERAL MEMBERS. THE LAST ELECTION OF DIRECTORS WAS HELD ON 13.07.2008 (LATEST ON 14.11.2011)
DURING CONDUCTION OF THE AGM HELD ON 06.09.2009 (WITH PERMISSION OF DRCS) THE PERSONS WHO LOST THE LAST ELECTION IN 2008 ALONGWITH SOME OTHER MEMBERS DID NOT ALLOW THE SECRETARY TO READ OUT THE SECRETARY'S REPORT AND SAID THAT THEY WILL NOT CONSIDER AND ALLOW TO GET APPROVED THE BUDGET. AS OUR BUILDING (14 NOS.) ARE NEARING 16 YEARS OLD AND SINCE GETTING ENTRY, NO MAJOR REPIR HAS EVER BEEN CARRIED OUT, SO THE THEN BORAD KEPT A PROPOSAL FOR MAJOR REPAIRING AND ALSO INCLUDED THE PROPOSED COST OF REPAIR IN THE BUDGET TO BE CONSIDERED AND APPROVED BY GENERAL MEMBERS.
THOUGH IN THE WBCS ACTS, 1983 IT IS SAID THAT 'IN CASE THE BOARD FAILS TO PREPARE AND PRESENT THE ANNUAL BUDGET IN THE AGM THEN THE GENERAL MEMBER TEHMSELVES WILL PREPARE A BUDGET AND APPROVE IT.
UNFORTUNATELEY NOWHERE IT IS WRITTEN IN THE ACTS AND RULES INSTEAD IT IS SILENT ON THE MATTER THAT 'WHAT WILL AHPPEN IF IN CASE A BUDGET (WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED YEARLY EXPENDITURES AS WELL COST OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURES FOR MAJOR REPAIR )PREPARED BY THE BOARD IS NOT CONSIDERED AND APPROVED BY THE MAJORITY'?
THE YEARLY PROPOSED BUDGET IS MORE OR LESS SAME OF LAST YEAR, DULY APPROVED IN THE LAST AGM.
KINDLY LET ME KNOW WHAT TO BE DONE IF IN CASE THE BUDGET IS NOT APPROIVED. REQUEST ALSO IF THERE ARE ANY CASE LAWS ON SUCH ISSUE.
SHALL BE GRATEFUL IF ANY ONE CAN GIVE A CLEAR REPLY AND WITHOUT ANY AMBIGUITY AND DUAL MEANING.
SHALL BE GRATEFUL FOR AN EARLY REPLY.
Sriprakash Bhattacharya, KOLKATA
bhattacharyasriprakash@gmail.com
Mobile: 91+9836310615
Raju
30 May 2012 at 02:56
I have come to know that as per the supreme court of india even the private agencies and bodies working as an instrument of the state will be defined as STATE only and can be challenged for fundamental rights violation.
Please enlighten is this means that private organisations profitable or non-profitable registered under the state with kind of different instruments can also be challenged for FR violation? , if they are indulged in any practice even if it is their personal internal body or agencies law? , and are factories and companies also come in the ambit of this state definition as per article 12?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bro
r/sir,
some resident of our village filed a application before the BRO officer for the closure of a Culver because of that culvert, during the rain water come to our houses and also cause damages to our crops.There is a alternate by which the rain water can be divert to near Nahlla by building 50 meter drain.
Road construction work in progress at this time, they are not closing the culvert.
now what remedies we have