Anonymous
30 March 2010 at 08:05
in relation to my query of fundamental rights-freedom oe speech and expression, i also want to know what does the military law says on this
Anonymous
30 March 2010 at 08:00
i was under trainee in indian military academy,dehradun to be an army officer,on 18 dec2009 i have been withdrawn from academy on discipline grounds but i was not given a chance to speak up my for my case,i was withdrawn just merely for meagre punishments which are a routine in academy,most of them were forced on me by my coy cdr,i was not allowed to speak in the march-up as well,where as per guidelines a) i should be given a show cause notice before withdrawal b)a court of inquiry should be held to investigate into the charges c)a chance to be given to a cadet to explain his conduct d) benefit of doubt should accrue to a cadet, but as per academys modus-operandi i was not even allowed to speak. my question is Is this is a violation of my fundamental rights- freedom of speech and expression?
Anonymous
29 March 2010 at 19:24
Can a director of a Pvt. Ltd. Co. In which chairman of nagar palika is also a director enter into a tender process and if he enters then what are the consequences?
Please reply with relevant section of up nagar palika act.
K.Hemachandran
29 March 2010 at 18:45
Landlord broke open my Shop & stole my all materials. I lodged Complaint at Police Station. Till the FIR not registered. Can I write to Magistrate & ask to order Police to take Lawful Action on my Complaint. Let me get some idea.
Thanks
KHChand
pratik
28 March 2010 at 12:05
In which act it is said that if we submit the affidavit to the high court or high court related matters we have to start the first line of drafting of the affidavit as "In the matter of & in which act it is said that if we dont have to submit the affidavit in high court or high court related matters we have to start the first line of drafting of the affidavit as "In the matter of the petition of
What do u mean by every affidavit shall be drawn up in the first person.(if the abovementioned line is written under the affidavit for any purpose).
Pls forward any case laws if any
Thanking u all experts in advances
pratik
28 March 2010 at 12:02
If the state government says that the tax on any things will be rs. 200 as an example but as per the Indian consitution, 1949 the tax should not be more than 100 so which tax rate should be followed?
Meaning of pecuniary limits as per section 6 of the civil procedure code, 1908 & what the section says.
Pls give the case laws if any
Thanking u all experts in advance.
Anonymous
26 March 2010 at 11:38
Dear Experts,
I am working in a registered society of a central government ministry. In Jan 2007 two persons were directly appointed in grade Rs. 12000/-(pre-revised) central government scale. These two were working in my organization for last seven years as employee of some outsourced company. In Jan 2007 the engagement contract between my org. and the outsourced company came to end in Jan 2007 but this information was not made public to employee. The above two persons were not having minimum requisite qualifications even for the entry level(Grade Rs. 6500/- pre-revised). There was no advertisement(internal/external) for that appointment. Even interviewing committee was not legal as per composition of committee. Interview committee should have one member(internal) from SC/ST, one departmental and one outsider expert in Software/Networking. In above case all three members were non-technical and from my organization. Moreover the post on which they were appointed was promotional post.
I joined my organization in 2000 in grade Rs 8000/- and was promoted in 2003 in grade Rs 10000/-. In Jan 2007 I was in grade Rs. 10000/- and was promoted in grade Rs. 12000/- in Nov 2007 only. Thus became junior to them.
I came to about this malpractice only in jan 2010.
Now I am feeling aggrieved working as junior to non-qualified people.
Please tell me whether there is any remedy?
My organization has given me negative reply to my representation. I will get any relief from court or not? If I approach the court what way I should do it.
Thanks a lot in advance.
R. Prasad
bhanu pratap720
24 March 2010 at 20:01
since women reservation bill proposes a 33% reservation in parliament, then according to article 368 does not it require ratification by 50%of the states as it proposes to change the schedule iv of the constitution of India .
Anita Dores
24 March 2010 at 17:13
A college student was excellent in his studies but hada habit of eve teasing. so a grp of girls complained to the principal twice abt his behaviour to which the boy denied and he was subseqently left off wid a warning by the principle.aftr a mnth same grp of girls complained abt him. the pricipal rusticated him frm the college. as a result the student filed a Writ petion under Article 226 in the high courtcontending tht the priciplal's action amounted to violation of principle of natural justice.
My query is hw does Artilce 226 apply in this case???
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Applicability of Evidence Act in writ jurisdiction.
Dear friends,
Writ petitions are decided mostly on the basis of affidavits.
Under what provision of Law affidavits are admissible in evidence ?
Further,is Evidence Act applicable to petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution ?