Satya nand aggarwal
30 April 2014 at 16:23
Gurnam Singh through his wife Bhagwant Kaur sold the property to Amar Singh on 26-11-1965. The real brother of Gurnam Singh namely Darbara Singh challenged the sale deed being ancestral/coparcenary property and sale deed was set aside and suit was decreed with effect that it will not effect reversionary rights of Darbara Singh after the death of Gurnam Singh. Gurnam Singh died on 22-1-1986. This Bhagwant Kaur filed a suit for possession which was decreed by Lower court but but it went up to the Supreme Court and hon’ble Supreme Court held that Bhagwant Kaur cannot take benefit of the decree as she herself sold the property being attorney if G Singh. However, sale deed was challenged by Darbara Singh and Darbara Singh was also one of the legal heir of Gurnam Singh. After the death of Bhagwant Kaur my query is,
(1). Whether Legal heirs of Darbara Singh can filed suit being one of the legal heir of Gurnam Singh and take benefit of the decree or not?,
(2). Darbara Singh died, Whether his son can remain in possession of the property as Bhagwant Kaur has also died but she took the possession.
Raj
30 April 2014 at 16:04
Sir...My Big Brother resident of Delhi has filed the tax evasion petition before the Income Tax authority Panchkula for conducting the investigation against the father in law who reportedly says that he has given 30 lakhs dowry at the time of marraige.The Directorate of Investigation, panchkula has not conducted any investgation and even under RTI he has not given any reply..Can we file the writ Petition against the writ petition in Delhi High court by making Directoarte General of Investigation (New Delhi) and Directorate of Income tax investigation, panchkula to conduct an investigation against his father in law for evasion of Income tax??
Vikas Sharma
30 April 2014 at 13:58
Kindly visit www.hcraj.nic.in and under case status of Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench search for case no.:
Special Appeal Writ (S.A.W.): case no. 93: year 2013 (Jeewan Singh vs Bhoor Singh Bagh Singh Trust)
And
Special Appeal Writ (S.A.W.): case no. 164: year 2013 (Bhawani Singh vs Bhoor Singh Bagh Singh Trust)
The above Appeals are filed against the registration of a public charitable Trust known as “Bhoor Singh Bagh Singh Public Charitable Trust”, which applied for its registration at Assistant Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Jaipur on 27.07.1970.
Till today, even after 44 years have passed, this Trust is fighting for its registration under Indian Judicial System and the litigation related with this Trust properties, which worth hundreds of crores, still going at the lowest level of judiciary in Jaipur Sessions Court.
The vested interests are abusing the judicial system and are not letting the litigations related with this Trust properties to complete.
Volunteer lawyers are requested to raise voice against this extraordinary delay in disposal of the litigations which are related with Public Charitable Trust.
Thanks..
amber
30 April 2014 at 13:56
Is any insolvent person announced earlier, liable for his prior debts, after becoming a solvent person?
niky......
30 April 2014 at 13:01
Building owner has filed evac case on me and one more tenant. Wanted to understand what impact will other case have on me as if the other tenant win can that be beneficial for my case? And how?
Thanks
ts
29 April 2014 at 20:39
Hello,
A will was made in 1970 which was duly probated in 1985 in favor of 2 legal heirs
A and B which included Property 1 and Property 2.
The executor of the will had put a clause in the will which stated that Property 1 will be inherited by A by giving B a sum of Rs.50,000/- and
the Property 2 will be inherited by B by giving Rs.10,000/- to A.
A and B had strained relations thus no act as per the will was done between them.
A issued a POA with rights to sale of property 1 in his possession before giving Rs. 50,000/- to B .The person who has the Attorney wants to sell the property now.
The query are-
1. Has the title of the property inherited by A before parting of Rs.50,000/- to B because the will stated that he can inherit the property only after he pays the amount to his brother B.
2.Can A issue the POA with selling rights to someone.
3.Can B in anyway stop the sale of this property before it is sold.
4.Can B also stop any new construction on this property.
5.Can B demand any increase of the sum of Rs.50,000/-as no sum was paid in 1985 when Rs.50,000/ had a big value and its a meager amount in today's times.
6.Can B refuse the sum of Rs.50,000/- and demand more and stop any sale or construction on this context.
Thanks...
BISWARANJAN PANDA
29 April 2014 at 20:19
THANK YOU SIR,
WHAT IS THE MEANING OF COMPUTING PERIOD OF LIMITATION UNDER THE LIMITATION ACT 1963
BISWARANJAN PANDA
29 April 2014 at 20:00
THANK YOU SIR ,
PART 3 OF THE LIMITATION ACT ,CONSISTING SECTION 12 TO 24 DEALS WITH THE EXCLUSION OF TIME FOR COMPUTATION OF PERIOD OF LIMITATION .
WHAT IS THE ACTUAL MEANING OF COMPUTING PERIOD ?
ARE THERE ANY LATEST SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Execution of decree
District Munsif court ordered the respondent to remove the cell phone tower in the residential area. If the respondent fails to remove the cell phone tower, the petitioner was permitted to remove the tower on the cost of respondent. The respondent was not ready to remove the tower. Respondent not ready to obey the court order in original suit (temporary injunction) as well as the EP order. Whether the revenue authorities directed to remove the tower since it is comes under public nuisance. What are the other remedies available to the petitioner to remove the tower.