santosh
28 June 2014 at 05:35
SIR, WE ARE WORKING FOR DAE, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, BUT AT DIFFERENT UNITS AND WE ARE HAVING CHILDRENS BELOW 10 YEARS. THE PROBLEM IS MY UNIT IS NOT WILLING TO TAKE MY WIFE AND HER UNIT REJECTED ME ON THE GROUNDS OF MY PREVIOUS CRs. THOUGH CRs HAS BEEN SPOILED DUE TO PERSONAL ENEMITY. NOW WHAT TO DO TO KEEP MY FAMILY TOGETHER?
Alok Agarwal
27 June 2014 at 23:41
Dear Sir/Mam,
Thanks for having such a legal advise platform!
In August 2013 I gave loan of Rs. 2 lacs to a known friend through NEFT from my personal account. Than in November I gave him cash loan of Rs. 120000 out of my income received in cash, which I showed in Balance Sheet and paid income tax on it. Than again in May I gave him cash loan of Rs. 50000 by withdrawing it from my account. Now he issued cheques with June 2014 date for all the above amounts separately in my name. Except for Rs. 50000 he has issued cheque in Self (no name on cheque accept Self) with signature also on back of the cheque. Now he has become defaulter and said that he won't return my money. I asked him to issue cheque of Rs. 50000 in my name, but he refused.
My question is that Cash loan is recoverable or not. Also whether the self cheque he has given is liable to get paid under section 138?
I have no worry for loan given through NEFT.
Cash loan given to him had been given out of my taxable income and as of now my personal balance sheet shows Rs. 170000 cash in hand, which I gave as cash loan.
I have already paid tax on such amount.
Or I have to show this amount of 170000 in my balance sheet as Cash Loan to XYZ instead of showing it cash in hand. Please advise!
Would appreciate your advise!
Alok Agarwal
27 June 2014 at 23:19
Dear Sir/Mam,
Thanks for having such a legal advise platform!
In August 2013 I gave loan of Rs. 2 lacs to a known friend through NEFT from my personal account. Than in November I gave him cash loan of Rs. 120000 out of my income received in cash, which I showed in Balance Sheet and paid income tax on it. Than again in May I gave him cash loan of Rs. 50000 by withdrawing it from my account. Now he issued cheques with June 2014 date for all the above amounts separately in my name. Except for Rs. 50000 he has issued cheque in Self (no name on cheque accept Self) with signature also on back of the cheque. Now he has become defaulter and said that he won't return my money. I asked him to issue cheque of Rs. 50000 in my name, but he refused.
My question is that Cash loan is recoverable or not. Also whether the self cheque he has given is liable to get paid under section 138?
I have no worry for loan given through NEFT.
Cash loan given to him had been given out of my taxable income and as of now my personal balance sheet shows Rs. 170000 cash in hand, which I gave as cash loan.
I have already paid tax on such amount.
Or I have to show this amount of 170000 in my balance sheet as Cash Loan to XYZ instead of showing it cash in hand. Please advise!
Would appreciate your advise!
Anufrancis
27 June 2014 at 15:08
HI Sir/ Mam
We have rented a place in Chennai for more than 20 years with different businesses. We have not stopped to pay the rent once also. Presently we do hotel business for past 5 years but two years ago our landlord suddenly asked us to stop the cooking which made us to go through lot of loss and now we are not able to run the hotel due to that. but still pay the rent. Please let me know how can i legally aproch this and do I have any chance to win the case.
Regards
Anu
nnnpppsssrrr
27 June 2014 at 13:16
Sir,
Greetings. kindly furnish me citations of Supremecourt/highcourt decisions on Section 60 of Registration act 1908.
Am interested in those decisions where it is held that non compliance of Sections--34(1),34 (3) (a) and 25 of registration act doesn't give the indispensable foundation of authority and jurisdiction to issue certificate of registration under sec 60 of Regn.Act 1908.
nsrpathi123@yahoo.com
ADV-JEEVAN PATIL, MUMBAI
27 June 2014 at 10:17
Making repeated leave n licenc rergistered agreement leaving one month gap to same person is safe
Jeevan
sharma
27 June 2014 at 01:05
say i m carrying 1 litre liquor with me, along with its purchase receipt, is it lawful?? if not, please give the reference of relevent portions of the relevent act.
lalhriatpuia
26 June 2014 at 21:58
recently my land(periodic patta i.e agricultural land) has been acquired as per Land acquisition act 1894 by Oil India Ltd. But as per Mizoram Land Revenue Rules, cess has been cut by the state goverment which was 15%(Rs.15 lakhs) from the land value of which i am highly aggrieved and it was unacceptable for the land owner. Is there any chance for me to go to the court to challenge the said Rules and to get back my said 15% compensation. please help.
Sanjeev Kalkori
26 June 2014 at 21:31
Dear Sir
In my case the person who dispossessed me. he is claiming that he has already possession in that flat and he saying that he is also owner of that flat.he producing documents that he has purchased that flat in Auction before 2 Years but actually i have purchased from builder in 2010 after that builder staying in my flat as tenant and paying rent every years
suddenly this person dispossessed with the help of gundas while that time my worker doing renovation job in my flat they are beaten to my worker taken key forcefully after that they directly gone to police station for complaint against them but the police not taken complaint against them but next day me & worker gone to police station then the police taken N.C against them as unknown 4 person dispossessed.
In this case what I can do against them.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
No proper apportunity to prefer appeal
in a partition suit, one of the defendant who purchased the ancestral joint family property, even after filing his WS, failed to aduce on the part of his evidence. Suit for partition was decreed agaisnt. Subsequently, the purchaser preferred an appeal on the grounds that proper apportunity was not given by the lower court. Is it a proper ground to prefer an appeal. No further grounds are mentioned