Richard
16 July 2014 at 16:14
An Christian Mother has a Individual house (self owned) in a land measuring 1 Ground in Prime location. The mother has a Son & a Daughter.
Both of the Mother's Children are Married and have two daughters each. Orally the parents have decided to give the girl the father's Job and the boy the House.
Both the parents died Intestate. Now the Girl after enjoying father's Job. Now ask for the partition in the House after her Brother's Death.
How this partition will take place according to the Christian Succession Law in India. Will the Job offered to the Girl counted while doing this partition. What share will the Son's wife (Widow) would receive?
PGKN
16 July 2014 at 13:18
Hi All,
I am fighting a case against a Auto company for supplying me a defective vehicle.
Distt comm court had given order in our favour and allowed us compensation of 1 Lac along with change of vehicle with litigation expense. We did not go for appeal, but company appealed in state comm
and State Comm court also favoured us but removed compensation.
Can we get and what are the ways to get enhanced compensation beyond 1 Lac via appeal in National Comm, as earlier we did not go for appeal in state comm.
If no then what are other ways / means to get additional compensation as we are not satisfied and did not appeal earlier as to settle the case fast.
Thanks & Regards in advance.
G. ARAVINTHAN
16 July 2014 at 12:29
In a rent control proceedings with regard to eviction tenant carrying on petrol bulk, whether an application filed by Indian Oil Corporation to implead it as a necessary party?
Whether this application is maintainable?
N.J. MISHRA
16 July 2014 at 12:15
Dear member kindly guide on below issue:
We are a private company, recently received letter under RTI.
Since, private company does not come under the purview of RTI Act, still is liable to reply the letter if received.
Balaji Bakthavathsal
16 July 2014 at 07:11
Dear Learned Advocates,
A civil case is dragging in the lower court for 4 long years. Petitioner has submitted all the documents in support of his side. All the respondents have become ex-parte. When the judge was about to give ex-parte order, one of the respondent submits an I.A. requesting to set aside the ex-parte order after almost 3 years of declaration of ex-parte. Counter reply was submitted to the I.A. Now, it is the turn of the opponent's advocate to place his argument against the counter reply. But the advocate is NOT coming forward and he has asked adjournment twice. What is the solution for this ? Is there any limit ? How long he can continue to seek adjournments ? Please give your valuable views.
Thanks & Regards
Balaji
Adv B.B.Gambhir #9814820602
15 July 2014 at 21:49
Raunaq Singh executed a gpa in favour of his son Sucha Singh on 22.07.1991 with a hope that he will served.
Raunaq Singh cancelled the said GPA on 14.11.1991
But Sucha Singh executed a agreement to sell on 16.08.1991 in fvour of Manmohan Singh
the time for sale deed was extended on 04.11.1992 upto 30.11.1994.
06.12.1994 Manmohan Singh filed a Suit for specific perofrmance against Sucha Singh only without impleading Raunaq Singh as party
In that Civil Suit, Sucha Singh appeared and suffered a statement in favour of Manmohan Singh on the basis of said statement the court decreed the suit on 06.03.1995
whether the sale deed in favour of Manmohan Singh is valid document
Adv B.B.Gambhir #9814820602
15 July 2014 at 21:06
under which provisions before cancellation of registered GPA, it is mandatory to send a notice to gpa holder. if not necessary then provide me any citation please.
kumar
15 July 2014 at 20:54
Namaskaram Sir/Madam,
I have one CMA case in AP High Court. In this case status CAV . Position in Interlocutory. What is the Meaning of CAV.
What is the meaning of FOR ORDERS.
I am respondent in this case.
priyanka naringrekar
15 July 2014 at 18:08
Hi,
We are situated at Mumbai. In our society we bought a flat in the year 2003. We paid transfer Fee and completed required documentation.However Secretary did not transfer the flat for his personal grudge.He denied all membership rights and issued bills in the name of previous owner up to year 2011.WE stopped payment of maintenance in protest of his injustice.
We did court case in the year Sep 2009 under Consumer Act. WE won the case in the year 2011. court ordered Managing Committee to transfer the flat and penalized them with Rs.1000.
1. Managing Committee did not follow courts order and we have not received penalty of Rs.1000 till date.
2.They forced us to pay interest on dues from the year 2003 up to 2011.
3. they gave payment acknowledgment in the year 2011 with the name of previous owner.
4. In spit of doing request for bill details and explanation for amount of dues they charged interest @18% up to 2011 . Till date Secretary has not given any details.
I have following query:
a)Is Violation of courts order punishable offence? if yes under which Act?
c)Secretaries decision of denying membership rights and recognition as a member and then imposing penalty on dues is a lawful decision? if not under which act we can seek justice and with whom?
d) Is their any fast track court or any authority who can help us?
Thanks.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Christian widow residing in mother-in-law's property: can this be partitioned
A Christian Widow resides in her Mother-in-Law's house with her 2 daughters.
Now her Husband's only Sister is seeking partition in this house
Mother-in-Law expired in 2000
Husband expired in 2013
The widow's only source of income is the rent from the portion of the house let out to tenants. Will this house be partitioned as per Christian Succession Act.