Pardeep Kumar
05 August 2014 at 16:37
R/ expertise
I filed a civil suit for PPI against private person with respect to land havind lease hold right for 40 years with custodian. Paid premimum rs 480,000. I filed suit before sub-judge but he return my plaint to file before munsiff court with local territorial jurisdictions. Now my quarry is that can munsiff court have jurisdiction to hear and decide suit as the value of subject matter beyond pecuniary jurisidiction.
shrikant
05 August 2014 at 15:50
R/sirs
Consumer forum grant compensation 10000 to the consumer for not giving electricity connection and if connection is not givin within specified time then consumer is entitle for compensation of Rs 2000 per month from Date of order to Date of release of connection.This order passed on 16/12/2001 by district forum.The respondent Electricity Company challange above order before state commisssion.The state commisssion granted the stay to the impunged order in Janewary 2002 and finally rejected the appeal in 2014 my question is whether the time period From 2002 to 2014 excluded while computing compensation of Rs 2000 per month from Date of order to Date of release of connection. Sir Please Reply Immidiately
SHIESTA007
05 August 2014 at 15:11
Dear Team members,
Brief facts of the case:
This case of Land Mafia. The defendants( land Mafia gangsters) are in the habit of forging and creating the documents of GPA of the Land owners and getting done sale deeds among themselves and then selling them to a big real estate business people and in-turn they sell the litigation property to someone else. Infact these business is rampant where were now.
The petitioners have won the case in the trial court. The court has declared that the Sale deeds be cancelled which is done on the basis of illegal, fraudulent General power of attorney. They have ordered for the demolition of the illegal building that is constructed during the pendency of the suit and hand over the possession of the property to the petitioners.
The defendants have preferred an appeal in the district court. The defendant is now trying to influence to court that the petitioners should get into compromise.
Even the new judge without going to the gravity of the case is asking the petitioners to compromise with the case.
The judge he himself said that now that is all done and happened, instead of getting the building demolished the petitioners should compromise as the purchaser has made an investment on the building. even if you go again 10 or more years the case would go on and on. the case would be running and justice would not be delivered to you.
To this the petitioners who took 8 years to reach the finality of the case now when the trial court has passed the judgement still the new district court judge is asking to go for compromise. The petitioners are not able to pay such a huge amount and do compromise.
first petitioners became the victim and then fought the case for such a long time.
And now go for compromise.
It is really hard and painful to hear from the judge asking the innocent victims to undergo with compromise. The heart bleeds to see that the common layman goes in to ask for justice and the honest man gets what in the end to compromise with all the wrong doings that the crooks have done.
Now please guide how to tackle this issue.
cant say no to the judge and the conscience says not to agree for the wrong doings.
At the first outright justice is delayed and after getting justice again the external forces in the form of law giver he only is trying to trample, and kill the justice that is to be delivered.
jiten
05 August 2014 at 12:36
dear sir,
good morning,i want to know that due to non appearance by my clients advocate,matter was dismissed,so i want to know that can i restore the civil suit?matter filing year was almost 1997,kindly give me information for the same.
thank you.
sridhar pasumarthy
05 August 2014 at 01:31
Respected Experts,
A suit was filed for prohibitory permanent injunction seeking to restrain the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of suit property.
As temporary injunction was not granted, pending suit, defendant encroached portion of suit property and made some constructions over it.
It was more than 3 years that the encroachment was made. But plaintiff's counsel did not choose either to amend the plaint for mandatory injunction or to withdraw the said suit and file a fresh suit for mandatory injunction.
As you know well that limitation for suit for mandatory injunction.is 3 years, which was expired already in this case.
My queries are:-
1. Whether plaintiff can withdraw his suit and file a fresh suit for recovery of possession to avoid the bar of limitation?
2. Can he seek any other relief?
Pls give your valuable suggestions.
lokesh
04 August 2014 at 21:23
my father is a farmer.we belongs to general merit caste. my father has purchased 10 cents of land which belongs to sc community.it is a ansestral land . is it permissible to purchase the sc land as per the law of india? my father has not taken any permssion from any government authority to purchase it. the land is in the state of karnataka
saravanakumar
04 August 2014 at 15:36
Hi, We have aproperty purchased in bangalore before 30years.Before 10 years the Property was completed all registration process and now its a Katha 'A' property. Also tax payed till date.
Next to our propery, family of the land lord members stays and now they are creating the problem saing that they have some portion of land in our site too. They also forcibly destructed our compound wall by rowdisam. By some influence, even they made the police as if they dint filed any case on those people. Please let me know what could I do to recover my property.
Even now we have some threat from them.
santosh
04 August 2014 at 14:41
hello,
what is the procedure of getting succession certificate for property? does any one need to pay any stamp duty as per the current value of propoerty ?
Anonymous
04 August 2014 at 13:48
Dear sir,is there a limitation period for lodging of complaint in J&K consumer protection law.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Vehicle details misprinted on rc book
Hi Everyone,
I am from Cochin,Kerala working at a Private company in Vadodara, Gujarat since last 6 years. Let me directly come to the point. I have bought a used Maruti 800 car about 1 month back and I am the 3rd owner of the vehicle. As I was not familiar with the RTO procedures, I took help of the previous owner itself for transfer of ownership of the car. But unfortunately it was after the vehicle got transferred to my name that I noticed 2 mistakes in the RC book.
1. Last five digits of Chassis no: handwritten in RC book is 56935 while actually it is 56945 imprinted on the vehicle
2. Body type imprinted on the RC book is SEDAN which I believe is also not true in case of Maruti 800.
When I enquired with Vadodara RTO, they said that its not a big deal correcting those mistakes ,but I must produce a proof for the same. I just want to ask whether if am taking my vehicle itself to RTO, will that solve the purpose?
if not then what should I do for getting the mistakes corrected? Please provide your valuable suggestions regarding the same....