Skeptical optimist
27 February 2015 at 08:26
My ex-colleague closed account with India based foreign bank within a year of opening it, attracting penalty. The account closure happened 3.5 years back (in Aug'11). However while final settlement, bank debited Rs. X in excess of penalty. He noticed this only 2 months back in Dec'14. On approaching bank, it "verbally" accepted its mistake, but said they will not entertain request for refund of Rs. X because account closure happened way back . He sent minutes of this discussion (by email) to concerned bank official in Dec'14 (minutes mentioned bank accepting its mistake). Bank did not contest this minutes by reply mail/letter till date. Also, in response to his letter to bank last week, bank replied on its letterhead saying: matter is too old to be considered (bank did not accept its mistake in this letter, though). Can 'this letter', and 'minutes of meeting email' together be considered 'fresh cause of action'; so as to overcome inadmissibility arising on ground of limitation act?
Skeptical optimist
27 February 2015 at 06:21
Does consumer courts accept correspondence by email with opposite party as evidence, or only written correspondence is admissible?
RAVI SINGH
26 February 2015 at 22:27
If a transfer of property takes place between two parties in a form of registered deed. Then can a third party who does not have any relation with the above two party nor have played any role in the transferring process, can put an objection on the deed before a court?
shakthi
26 February 2015 at 22:06
After forming a society if one person disagree for certain expenses can the society overlook his views nor he will be convinced get his approval then works will b done
shakthi
26 February 2015 at 22:00
Is there any legal binding to pay the dues of flat prior to flat bylaws
shakthi
26 February 2015 at 21:57
Out of 12 people 1 not willing to form society or association.without his consent is it possible to form
Udit
26 February 2015 at 17:32
Sir, I wanna ask one more thing, in the same case The District Magistrate ordered in his judgement to pay Rs. 8 crore as the arrears of rent and to pay Rs. 9 lakh per month from January, 2015. The defendant while appealed in the high court, asked for stay on the order of D.M. The High court admitted the appeal but denied to grant stay and said if the half of the ordered amount is deposited and half of the rent since January, 2015 is paid than only it will grant stay on the order, otherwise stay can not be granted. Could you please tell me that what step can i take for enforcement of the order. Can it be decreed and process of recovery could be initiated or what other remedy is available if the high court does not grant stay on the order and admits the appeal.
shakthi
26 February 2015 at 16:52
I am one among the 12 owners of our falt.My flat people unanimously taking decisions and forcing me to bear the cost of painting,laying pavers for the flat which is of poor quality and unsafe,they procede even after expressing my concern and objection Should i abide their plans which results in wastage except me everone is convinced.I spent 25K one month back again they carrying out some works which is not necessary and forcing me to pay another 15,my problem is apart from my objection my finance position is bad so i couldnt make the payment which resulting in fights tortures.
Kindly advice me the legal part.Our flat has no BYLAWS.
Thanks &Regards
Shakthi
Sunlawseeker
26 February 2015 at 16:04
Dear Advocates!
As per the resolution passed by the board of Rotary club, they dismissed their President and Secretary.
But, the said President and Secretary are still acting as such.
Could you help me to remove them to get the administration?
Thanking you
V.Sundaresan
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Flat vs vendors
We are 12 people in a flat ours is not a society.Usually our flat will not allow vendors to occupy the place ouside our flat (on the road).Foe the past 3 years old couple occupied in front of our flat ofcourse not obstructing the way,actually they render service to us by opening the gate and check other sales person entering the flat.They play the role of watchman unfortunately they play dis role to me since i have a separate gate entrance .Now in my absence 11 flat owners threatning them to packup their shop.In our street its has been a practise that almost all flats gave permission for one vendor so they thay are mutually benefitted.This aged couples crying to me to save their shop i dont know whatto do,what stand should i take?
Shakthi