Nazeer Ahmed
19 April 2015 at 18:34
In the OA the bank as an applicant had stated that " I SUBMIT THAT IAM THE DEBT SERVICE MANAGER OF THE APPLICANT BANK AND AS SUCH I AM WELL ACQUAINTED WITH THE FACTS OF THE CASE AND I AM COMPETENT TO FILE THIS PROOF AFFIDAVIT".This is the undertaking that the officer appearing on behalf of the applicant bank had filed in the court and while so when during the cross examination the said officer while answering the questions nearly 75percent of the questions he answered as "I HAVE TO CHECK / I HAVE TO VERIFY / IAM NOT AWARE / I HAVE TO THROUGH ON DETAIL ON SECTION 13(4) OF SARFAESI ACT / I NEED TO CHECK" based on this cross examination, can we file a petition in the court challenging the undertaking given in the proof affidavit by the said officer? Please guide.
Amit
19 April 2015 at 14:31
Dear Experts,
I had query regarding the section 36 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural land Act 1948;
1. If the Sale Permission under section 43 is obtained by the Adivasi Tribal and sold his land to another non-adivasi person and as per the permission transferred the use of agri to non-agri use. ANd N.A. order is also obtained.
2. Now if the purchaser wants to sell the above land did he needs sale permission again from the Collector?
3. And if he cannot need again then plz. give some citation of the similar judgments.
Pls. help me as i have my matter pending under this section.
Anonymous
19 April 2015 at 12:37
s.1(2) of drc states "such urban areas included before 1958 in areas provided in the first schedule".
Now it can be inferred that even if an area has been included in areas provided in first schedule, still it has to be an urban area for the applicability of the DRC ACT. Now no furthur notification is to be found of urbanisation of that area. My question is will still be DRC ACT applicable on that area and from BDO office through through RTI it has been answered that the particular area is rural.
Please provide your valuable opinion and suggestions if any.
Member (Account Deleted)
19 April 2015 at 11:35
DEAR EXPERTS,
MY UNCLE LOST CIVIL LAND PARTITION CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.
MAY HE FILE FRESH NEW SUIT AGAINST SAME OPPONENT AND SAME LAND IN THE LOWER COURT AGAIN WITH NEW EVIDENCE?
PLEASE ADVISE ME SIR.
TNX.
mahesh nair
18 April 2015 at 20:36
i'm from kerala.my grandfather died on may 2013.my father,aunt and my grand mother are legal heir.my aunt and my grandma legally transfer their share to my father.my aunt son prepared a fake will that my grand father agrees to give 1/2 of his property.how to prove it as fake
akashsaxena
18 April 2015 at 12:54
I have a bike, which was stolen in September 2009, against which I had filed the FIR. Later on bike was recovered and I got the Superdari order from court for releasing the bike from Police station in December 2009. Now I am selling the bike to some one. Please guide me whether I need to get the superdari order cancelled or not. If yes, what will be the procedure and charges to get this done.
SABIR AHMED
18 April 2015 at 11:20
Dear Expert,
Please let me know the law related to the inheritance of tenancy right after the death of the original tenant ( survived by his wife and two unmarried daughters ) as per the latest and amended West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act.
Regards,
Sabir
Member (Account Deleted)
18 April 2015 at 11:17
WILL- document rights.
MSC Shekar
17 April 2015 at 16:27
Section 40 of Registration Act 1908 is Authority to Adopt / Powers to Adopt.
In this regard my query is How is this instrument made i.e. Document/Sealed Document/etc. and how and in What Book / Register does the Registration Department record such instrument ?
Please advise.
Thanks in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Owner cheated on house deposit
I moved into this property on May 25th and the rent agreement is effective from 1st June.
The owner charged us for the period of 6 days, in addition to the following charges borne by us subject to deduction from following month's rent:
Plumbing repair charges, electrician repair charges,Painting etc. As these transactions were done in cash and most local services do not issue any receipt, we deducted the following month's rent and paid the remainder amount(very small) in cash to the owner.
Now when i have vacated the flat, the owner has refused to acknowledge the charges and has deducted rent for the month of June(already adjusted) on top of charging us for staying in the house from 15th May (which is completely false).
I vacated the flat in February, and the owner has not yet paid the deposit, in spite of the fact that the agreement states that she should have been paying the deposit immediately on handover.
Can someone please advice?