Deepi Saini
07 August 2015 at 17:02
‘A’ entered into court settlement in May 2013 with ‘B’(petitioner) for 15% share in property through her GPAs (both ‘C’ &’D’ are sons of ‘B’). C signed all documents and D signed as witness. Necessary documents for property transfer still not filed and ‘B’ dies in Jan 2015. One of the GPA ‘C’ also dies in June 2015.
Is settlement still valid when beneficiary/petitioner and one of the GPAs who signed settlement are dead?
vishal singh
07 August 2015 at 13:18
my sister husband expires on 6th march her mother in law denied to take her at her home and demand dowry to take her back to her home.
we filed case under 498a & dp3/4..but now she trying to sale her property so she show in court that she dont have any thing to give to my sister.
case is in mediation & she is not cooperating.her husband is also died many year before marriage of my sister.
IS THERE ANY WAY TO STOP HER TO SALE HER PROPERTY SO LATER MY SISTER GET HER SHARE?
Anonymous
07 August 2015 at 12:54
Can a hier of an ancestral house stay on during while a partition suit is progress ? Can he abuse this facility in such a way that no others can concomitantly use it ? Is there a legal recourse to prevent him from such behaviour if he is unwilling to take heed from requests of other heirs ?
MANIKANTA CHANDRAGIRI
07 August 2015 at 10:33
This manikanta from chittoor andhrapradesh . SEZ take my paddy land in 2006 below market rate.present 2015 SEZ no construction any factory or building in this land. SEZ think to make this land for real estate.so how get back my land from SEZ.
S Singh
07 August 2015 at 04:50
There is a bailment contract between A (bailor) and B (bailee)
Third party C files suit against A and B and claim the subject-matter.
C takes out an IA and obtains an order upon B to maintain status-quo with respect to the subject-matter till the final hearing and final disposal of IA.
But astonishingly in the mean time B delivers the subject-matter to C.
B also issues a letter to A for anticipatory cancellation of the contract with him.
Today the subject-matter has been alienated and also the IA withdrawn by C.
What are the remedies left out to A for recovering damages?
(I am A and the subject-matter is the dematerialized company shares)
Nikunj Poddar
07 August 2015 at 04:24
can my appeal be squashed in the final argument because it has been filled after the expiry of limited period?
amit
06 August 2015 at 22:26
A salary certificate duly sealed and signed is issued on company's letter pad, send by email to the wife of deceased employee.
The company is private company situated in UAE.
How can that certificate be prove in India before the Motor Accident claims Tribunal ?
What was the procedure to prove such type of foreign documents in India? (As employer is not willing to come to India & no record, maintain in due course, is available in India)
Kanakawallee
06 August 2015 at 22:05
Is there any difference between Residence certificate general and Annexure II A residence certificate. (Telangana)
what if a person had resided in multiple local areas how to obtain residence certificate
do we have to approach the MRO of the previous local area or the current
I require to get residence certificate for admission into higher education. I pursued graduation through distance mode after a gap of 4 yrs from inter. Now I am asked to submit
the residence certificate for preceding 7 yrs of graduation for admission. It has been five years that finished my graduation.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Why do you want this information under rti act
DEAR EXPERTS, PLEASE SUGGEST ME
01 UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, DURING SECOND APPEAL IN THE CENTRAL OR STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, CAN ASK TO THE APPEALLANT, WHY DO YOU WANT THIS INFORMATION,
02 YOU WANT LARGE( ABOUT 20 TO 50 PAGES,) INFORMATION, WHICH WILL NOT PROVIDED BY SPIO OR CPIO, BUT FIRST APPEALLATE AUTHORITY ALLOW TO GIVE INFORMATION, IS IT LEAGAL OR ACCORDING TO RTI ACT
THERE IS NO PROFISION OF THE ABOVE POINTS IN THE RTI ACT 2005, UNDER THE SEC 7(2) MENTION AS"AN APPLICANT MAKEING REQUESTFOR INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE GIVE ANY REASON FOR REQUESTING THE INFORMATION, OR ANY OTHER PERSONAL DETAIL EXCEPT THOSE THAT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR CONTECTING HI"
THERE IS NOT ANY PROVISSION THAT YOU CAN NOT TAKE MORE THEN 50 OR MORE PAGES OF INFORMATION, YOU CAN NOT INSPECT THE FILE, IS IT JUSTICE, IF NOT WHAT IS THE OPTION FOR ME OR ANY OTHE APPEALLANT OR COMPLAINANT
THIS IS THE SUBJECT FOR LARGER INTREST OF PEOPLE, WHO DOESN'T KNOW ABOUT, LIKE ME, PLEASE SIR, GIVE ME CORRECT SUGGESTION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
THANKS