johan
19 September 2015 at 08:18
Respected Lawyers, I had sent a draft of written objections to my lawyer by email in which I had agreed to sending a mail to my wife but claimed privelige under section 23 of indian evidence act.he verbally agreed to include all the points I had included in the draft.On the day of submitting documents in the court he tampered with the statements and denied sending mail to my wife and forced me sign it in the court itself. I want to change the written objection now.is it too late to claim privelige under section 23 in the revised written statement.
Aakash
19 September 2015 at 07:55
Our society don't let children play in society park, only a handful of members put restrictions, what should we do?
jains
18 September 2015 at 23:55
Me and one Mr.x(builder) entered in to an agreement for construction of a residential building in Tamilnadu. the agreement is executed in malayalam in kerala. The property belong to my son-inlaw, who native of tamilnadu is now abroad. The builder received full amount, but done only half work. I want to file suit for specific releaf to get an order for complting the work by the defendant. Can I file the suit in kerala or else I have to file it in Tamilnadu as tyhe property and unfinished building situated in Tamilnadu.?
victim
18 September 2015 at 23:40
I have a very Peculiar case. My wife had filed about 10 cases against me & my family. She belongs to lawyers family.I had filed Divorce which is pending. there is a property in the joint name of me & my wife. In DV case she got right of residence in that property but NO Protection order against me. after this order she filed a civil suit for absolute ownership of the property stating she is the joint owner and in physical possession of the property. I am defending the case.I paid all the initial money in buying the flat from my individual account. I am paying EMI to the bank through ECS. She was the co-applicant in loan also.
Please suggest can court grant her the absolute ownership? What should i do?
asok
18 September 2015 at 19:37
We saw the ad in olx chennai , that the seller ( devaraj ) is manufacturing and selling new sofas under the name ( thirumala furniture ) , we ordered 3 sofas of rs.42,000 worth , so in advance we gave rs.8000 in cash , but he didnt gave the bill , instead he gave a written statement... he asked one week time , so after a week, we kept on calling but he didnt pick up the phone, and atlast after 14 days he called and said sofa is ready , so we went to his factory to see it, but to our shock , he hasnt made the sofa as we said, it was fully wrong(size difference, color differenent,shape different .... ) and it was so horrible looking like a second hand... not even worth for rs.10000, so we said we dont need the sofa , and asked him to better return the amount of rs.8000, even we asked him to deduct some amount and then give the balance... but he was so stubborn and said i will alter and give u the sofa , he spoke as though we are getting a second hand sofa... we said no need and asked our amount of rs.8000 , but he rudely said to go wherever u want but i wont give ur rupees... he even said why are u calling me and troubling and asked us to call his partner and ask, we gave our amount and order to him only , but he is shouting us to call his partner, he was this irresponsible and he has cheated us, still the sofa and my amount of rs.8000 is with him..... so now i have the following evidence : 1. call record 2. written statement( no bill ) which he gave that he has recieved rs.8000 , so is this 2 evidence enough to approach consumer court ?
Deep Kumar Saha
18 September 2015 at 16:41
Background: One proprietorship concern has entered into an agreement with a company and in terms of the agreement deposited security deposit toward guarantee of the service with an option to the company to forfeit the security deposit in case of non performance. Accordingly, the Company forfeited the security deposit due to non performance of the contract by the proprietorship concern. Now the proprietorship concern has instituted a money suit against the Managing Director of the Company by mentioning his name. Hence, the Company was not made a party directly.
My query:
1. whether the suit instituted against the Managing Director of the Company tantamount to suit against the Company?
2. can the suit be dismissed on the ground that the suit is instituted against wrong person, as the Managing Director is not personally liable for the dispute and therefore he is not the necessary party.
naveenraj jain
18 September 2015 at 13:45
Sirs
In 1968 my friends father purchased two revenue sites in Bangalore. In the year 1972 BDA an agency of govt. aquired the sites for formation of layout and till today the BDA has not compensated nor given any alternate site even after repeated communication. BDA in their letters have said that alternate land cannot be given and has awarded a paltry 23280 as award amount that too deposited in courts. My friends father was in India. Air force when he purchased these sites. He expired in 2011 bedridden for almost two years. He had everyday visited the office of the BDA for his grievances but died without any result. Now my friend wants to know whether it is prudent to continue for the claim
VIKAS AGARWAL
18 September 2015 at 07:35
i have filed a suit for permanent injunction order.
it is getting delay for hearing,judge remains frequently on leave.
if i can write to department of justice & legal affairs for this matter.
i want this case to be disposed off early.
if there is any other way so that the court may here it earliest and disposed it off.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Rule to obtain the original documents from the bank.
Sir, my brother in-law has taken loan from the bank to purchase a flat. He expired and his wife also expired and he has no children. His mother got the Legal heir certificate and produced in the bank along with the death certificates of her son and daughter in-law and also the ration card. She has cleared all the dues and requested the bank to return back the documents. Bank negatived her request saying that she should produce succession certificate. Please kindly clarify on this and also request to quote any rule their in.