Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Ranjit   06 February 2016 at 21:38

Borrowed money recovery

My friend borrowed Rs 20,000 for a month but now it's already 2 years he is not returning my money even after continuous reminder. Please let me know what steps I can take legally to get my money back. I don't have any legal documents but I hv wats app messages about the request of money and also delaying of payment.

Abhishek soni   06 February 2016 at 17:16

stamp paper...urgent reply plzzzz

How much rupees stamp paper needed for getting cash of 10 lacs from a friend in Gujarat?

pvra   06 February 2016 at 16:34

Case number needed

Respected Sir,

I am in need of case citation.

I wish to have the case number and case citation details for Judgement delivered by Hon'ble Justice K.K. Sasidharan of Madurai Bench of Madras High Court during February 2013 that 'FIXED DEPOSIT MUST BE PAID ONLY TO NOMINEES'.

I will be thankful for your reply please.

Eshwari

Suresh Babu Rai   06 February 2016 at 13:13

Forgery!


Morning All!
Herein Telangana! If aggrieved by the orders/proceedings such as mutations (ownership) and entries in the revenue records passed by the Thahasildar an appeal lies with the Court of RDO (Appellate Authority under ROR) in challenging such proceedings.
Accordingly aggrieved by in a proceedings, I have filed an appeal before the RDO/Appellate Authority under ROR and the very appeal is allowed in my favour with a direction that the entries in respect of X are fake and ours are genuine. (A revision lies to the Joint-Collector within thirty days and I have filed a caveat before revision authority) on behalf of my client.
Meanwhile my client has received a warrant of injunction from the civil court. (Surprisingly basing on the latest Pahani {Entry in the Revenue Records} issued by the Thahsildar, whose proceedings were set aside in an appeal the court pleased to grant exparte injunction). On bare perusal of the copies and documents thereto (filed by the X) the X has suppressed the material facts and got exparte injunction against my client in spite of filing revision passed against hr.im with the Court of Joint-Collector.
My client approached the Thahasildar (whose proceedings are set aside in an appeal) to enquire that what made him in issuing the latest pahani 2014-15 in favour of X, in spite of directions in appeal, he said that neither himself nor his subordinates has issued such latest pahani and the same is found forged, fabricated, manipulated and created. It seems that the X has obtained the pahani for the year 2011-12 on 20.01.2016 and fabricated the 2011 as 2014 and 2012 as 2015 in order to appear the same to the court as 2014-15, dated 20.01.2016, but according to the office they have not issued the pahani for the 2014-15 but issued 2011-12 on 20.01.2015 when X approached and informed them that he is filing a revision.
I have lodged to complaint before the office, enclosing the copeis served from the court to my client stating that ‘whether the said pahani 2014-15 is issued by them or not’ and the same authority has issued a memo to the X asking him to produce the same. The office also informed that they will take criminal action for forging their records and asked us to summon them to the court of law to depose the same.
The application under 39, R. 1 and 2 of CPC stood for appearance of my client wherein the Hon’ble Court pleased to grant exparte injunction without knowing the forge.
I never come across with such type of practice, even the court staff also shocked knowing this, please advise me further………
Thank you one and all….

Rajeshkumar   06 February 2016 at 09:31

lok adalat

My father filed a suit valuation act under 37(2), 27(c) against his 3 brothers. On second case hearing itself the defendants advocate requests to lok adalat. On next hearing the case was changed to lok adalat and we received a letter from sub-ordinate judge to attend mega lok adalat with advocate on 13th feb. Under money suit lok adalat.
My doubts are:
1. Without the plaintiff opinion the case will change to lok adalat court?
2. If the plaintiff not likes to go for that mega lok adalat what are the procedures?
3. If the plaintiff did't attend that lok adalat hearing, what will happen? The judgement will favour to defendents?
4. plaintiff advocate told that the defendents called for compromise we did't go for compromise so they filed case on lok adalat, if we dont like to go that lok adalat we no need to go? Is it right? Without the plaintiff advocate opinion the case will changed to lok adalat? Is it possible? Please help me.

Suneel   05 February 2016 at 22:00

Need help

Sir
I was working in a state govt job. In the year 2008 some work was executed. But it came into my notice that something is wrong there. I was not aware about govt norms. I along with my senior lodge complaint in police station against 3 people. Meantime I switch job to some other govt organization. After some time police arrested me in the same charges as with those people. One person of those 3 has surrendered. Now after 5.6 years I along with 4 people has been charged with 120B, 420,409,467,468,471.
Also my senior has witnessed in 2009 that I lodged complaint because I was also with those people.
Please suggest what to do. It's urgent

Tushar Dangat   05 February 2016 at 19:51

5 years old building slab collapse at badlapur

My father owned new constructed flat 5 years ago possession date was 24 Jan 2011.On 16th Jan 2011 Saturday giant crashing sound from my bedroom where my wife got injuries.she was hospitalized for the week,luckily my 3 years old son was not their .He just moved to next room by 2-3 minutes before this incidence happened .

Mail ID: tushar.dangat7@gmail.com

Dharmendra More   05 February 2016 at 15:32

Admission of arbitration petition in the high court


Dear Experts,

We are a pvt ltd co based in mumbai.We had given contract to a co who does civil works to do Epoxy flooring, wall coating and painting in our factory in the year 2010. We gave some advance to the co before starting the work for the material together with Purchase Order mentioning in the event of dispute the matter will be settled in Mumbai Jurisdiction. The co. completed did the shoddy job in context to Epoxy flooring as the flooring got peeled off within few days due to which our product which we manufactue and started receiving material returned from our customer. Because of this we suffered financial loss. We inform to the co.about this and Co sent their people to inspect and accepted that there was a flaw in the flooring job and assured us that they will redo the job which they did. But again the same problem repeated. Again they redid it again the same thing happened. Because of this we refused to pay them their outstanding money. They went to Micro small and medium council (the civil co is a small medium co)i Thane. While arguing there we informed the Council that it has no jurisdiction as the case is to be filed in mumbai jurisdiction. Irrespective of this, the MSME Council pass an order in civil co favour asking us to pay their outstanding amount together with interest three times than bank rate notified by RBI. Against this, we filed Arbitration Petition in the Bombay High Court. In reply to our petition the said civil co. filed an affidavit in the High Court saying as per Section 19 of MSME developement Act 2006 Bombay High Court has no jurisdiction and Thane District Court has a jurisdiction and 75% of the amount decided by the MSME Council should have been deposited in the Court else the the petition has no meaning.The section 19 of MSME development act 2006 is overriding section 34 of Arbitration Act.

In regard to this, can expert advise me as below :



1. Can Bombay High Court admit our Arbitration Petition on any ground.

2. If High Court admits the petition then do we have to deposit 75% amount of the total amount ordered by MSME Council.

3. Can we challenge in any Court of law in case High Court dismiss the petition.


Regards,

DM

Dipak N. Bhatt   04 February 2016 at 17:10

Leakage from upper floor

Respected Sir,
My flat is on 1st floor and leakage got in my room from 2nd floor room. 2nd floor Flat owner not ready to do the work in his room even not allowing me to do the same. I can't entered forcefully in his room. Leakage from make my room dirty. I have given written complaint to Society they are doing time pass no confirm decision.

I am staying in New Mumbai Kharghar comes under CIDCO territory. Where I can fill the complaint.

Is there any law available to solve the problem.

Can you help me to solve the problem?

deven   04 February 2016 at 13:30

Non joinder - mis joinder

in a summary suit, i am for one of the defendant i.e. one partner of the partnership firm. The plaintiff has not made the partnership firm as a party to the summary suit. is the summons for judgment is liable to be dismissed ?