pranab majumdar
23 February 2016 at 11:55
Respected sir,
there is a telecommunication equipment of reliance telecommunication in the basement of our building complex and a facility agreement done between company and residents association.The company has stopped payments of monthly rent and the agreement also overdue for renewal.Reapeated telephone calls regarding this to the concerned company individual is also of no use.Though our association is not registered till can we serve a legal notice to the company or not?
Pl.advice.
Amit
22 February 2016 at 17:42
I am planning to buy an Auction property.
The title documents is where i ned clarification.
The bank has the previous chain, but the borrowers original receipt is only with them. The borrower agreement was in the registration office, when the bank went to collect it they were told it was taken by the borrower or his lawyer.
The borrower has since died and bank is in possession since the last six years.
The bank wont give a FIR of lost or misplaced document.
How to i clear the title with respect to me wanting to sell the property at a later stage?
Anonymous
22 February 2016 at 00:42
Is there any time limit to file complaint for Land grabbing
AMIT KUMAR MISHRA
21 February 2016 at 21:24
A party is having dispute of Rent or Lease with Nagar Palik Nigam
Preimum is paid by party and possession has taken by party
Party is saying that this shop is as lease
Nagar Palik Nigam is saying that this shop is in rent.
My Question is that which citation can help or give light in type of case.
Swapnil
21 February 2016 at 19:23
Sir i am in person and take cross of PW1 after recall petition by me but few question yet pending, how i can do it if court place matter for defendants evidence. while other side adv. also wants to file further evidence where as plaintiff evidence already closed Copy appl. file for statement of cross of pw1 which yet pending. pls guide
Amit
21 February 2016 at 14:43
I have purchased a property from a bank in a public auction. The property was in physical possession of the bank. The same was handed over to me.
Now i have come to know that the symbolic possession was not taken by the bank as he flat was locked. Thus no ad was published for symbolic possession.The bank then approached the DM and got order to take physical possession.
I have been told that symbolic possession id not compulsory.
Please advice with any law or ruling. Is the Title clear?
sivakumar.k
21 February 2016 at 06:12
HOW TO EXECUTE LOK ADALATH AWARDS , ITS = DECREE, BUT ITS NOT IN THE FORM OF DECREE?
Divya
20 February 2016 at 22:00
Respected Experts
I have a decree granted by court "A" against debtors... Debtors have their land and assets in other cities/states such as B or C where they have development rights of land in "B" or "C".
Where should i file execution for attachment of development rights of developer.... is execution to be filed at "A" or at place where land is situated i.e. "B" or "C"
Thankyou
PRADEEP M KUNDER
20 February 2016 at 21:24
1. I have received notice of summary suit in 2008 from bank.
2. I have filed My advocate’s vakalatnama within 10 days of receipt of notice.
3. Now in Feb 2016, I have got summons of judgement. The delay of almost 7 years.
4. The amount recoverable is shown in one vehicle account and one OD account.
5. The amount recoverable in one vehicle account( No1) is purely interest amount because bank already recovered principal amount and interest up to the date of NPA. Now they are demanding interest amount only from the date of NPA to suit date.(details not available in SJ)
6. Bank has mislead the court by not disclosed another vehicle account(No 2) is closed and earned interest at almost 16% than the contracted rate of apprx 12.50%. The excess amount collected is not trfd to No1 vehicle account.
7. There are many other points in my defense since I was no longer the partner because partnership was dissolved and Vehicle No 3 was transferred to my individual loan and then bank officials signed dissolution document as witness.
MY QUESTION FIRST IS WHETHER SERVING SUMMONS OF JUDGEMENT AFTER 7 YEARS IS VALID AND WHY LIMITATION ACT SHOULD NOT BE APPLIED.
2ND BANK HAS DISCLOSED ONLY THE FACT AND FIGURES WHICH IS BENEFICIAL TO IT, THE OTHER FACTORS LIKE CHARGING OF PENAL INTEREST, EXORBITANT CHARGES OF REPOSSESSION AND PARKING, NOT DISCLOSED. AND ALSO OTHER FACTORS SUCH AS DISSOLUTION OF PARTNERSHIP IS NOT DISCLOSED TO THE COURT IN SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENT.
kindly advice
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Sale agreemment without poa and will
Facts :
a) House allotted by Housing Board to First Party on Installment basis in 1995.
b) First Party transfer the property in 1996 to second party through Registered POA, Agreement and Will.
c) In year 1998 Second party transfer the property to third party by executing only Sale Agreement which was also not registered.
d) Since property was allotted on Installment basis due to this property was not get registered at any of the stage because still the installments are due .
e) Housing Board generally issues " NAMANKAN LETTER " in such cases in the favour of transferee if the case pertains prior to 2003.
f) Board is still agree to issue " NAMANKAN LETTER " in the favour of Second Party since POA, Agreement and will is on the place.
g) Board is not agree to issue " Namankan Letter " in the favour of third party since POA and Will is missing.
h) Second Party is also not Traceable from last 5-6 years.
Please suggest further course of action so that Third Party can have legal ownership over the property.