Anand
19 July 2017 at 12:57
Hello everyone
Is OBC candidates of central list are eligible in DSSSB jobs.
Iam from Haryana and belongs to OBC category list provided by central government dated 9/3/2004. I have secured cut off marks but not shortlisted for interview.
Kindly clarify that I am eligible for Tgt CSE post advertised by Delhi Subordinate services selection board.
Anonymous
19 July 2017 at 09:50
what all permits & permissions do I require to start the following entrepreneur businesses from my home
1. Catering business
2. Decorators business
3. Sound & light hire business
I wish to do it as an individual or as proprietor.
aastha sharan
18 July 2017 at 19:02
QUES: Can builders deny possession of the property to the buyers during the pendency of the complaint?
I found this article which talks about a order which says that builders can't deny possession to buyers during pendency of complaint.
http://www.thelogicalbuyer.com/blog/when-to-file-a-case-in-consumer-court/
THIS IS MENTIONED IN THE ARTICLE
"During pendency of this complaint, the possession of the flats in question will be handed over to such of the flat buyers who are the members of the complainant Association and are yet to receive possession, without asking them to sign the waiver letter."
However, even after lots of research i haven't been able to find the case in which this order was given! i've looked everywhere!
Kindly help me find a case law which will support this article.
Thank you.
ALSO, this should be in reference to NCDRC.
sumer singh
18 July 2017 at 15:10
Sir,
I have come to know your expertise through lawyerscindia.
I required your advise on following matter-
1. I am working on the post DMM. (single post in organisation)
2. my promotional post WMDO is vacant due to retirement, WMDO post is also single post in organisation.
3. initial appointment on WMDO was through initially deputation subsequently absorbed, and now he is retired from the organisation.
4. AS per recruitment rules , method of recruitment on WMDO post is promotion, direct recruitment/deputation. percentage of post not mentioned in RR.
5. i am entitled from every angle for promotion on the post of WMDO.
sir, what will be position for me in the light of reservation and other point of view. whether my right is on the post or department can do other choice to avoid me.
please guide me.
with regards
sumer singh champawat
jodhpur
Rajdeep Sidhu
18 July 2017 at 14:29
My grandfather made will on agriculture land. My grandfather get this property from his father father. My grandfather was two brother and in 1970 property was divided in both of them by my grandfather father. Now my grandfather made will 1996 and execute in 2000 after his death on divided part. My grandfather has three son and will made in favour of two son in equal share. My grandfather exclude my father from property. My father also expired in 1998. Will was registered and original. Now is this property comes in Hindu law 1956 as an ancerntral property ???
sumit
18 July 2017 at 11:59
hello sir ,i m reserve list candidate of ibps po5 2016_17 .sir due to non joining of candidates there is almost 2000 seats remaind vacant but due to non participation of banks almost 400 candidates didnot get their seats for achieving our rights we have filled petition in bombay high court.a nd in this case we all have filed many rtis to banks and the banks like syndicate,corporation kept us in dark when we ask did bank will participate in 2nd round then they say process is going on so how we can know that bank will participate or not,in other hand they (ibps)released the result on 31march 2017 in late evening intentionaly around 7 pm so that the candidate who did not selected in reserve list can not file case at that particular date 31 march which is the last period of validity of our reserve list so please let me to know that our case is strong or not and we will get judgement in our favour or not,we have 5 to 6 supreme case and other high court judgement which is favourable to us.
Krishna N
18 July 2017 at 11:28
A person was born in India in 1955. The law is clear that they automatically become a Citizen of India by birth as per Section 3(1) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. The child’s parents were foreign citizens at the time, but the law is again clear that this has no impact on the child’s citizenship status.
The child then acquired a passport of a foreign country and travelled out of India while still being a Minor. My understanding is that minors acquiring foreign passport does not constitute voluntarily acquiring a foreign country’s passport, therefore they continue to be Indian citizens. Is my understanding correct?
That child continued to hold the foreign passport even after becoming a major at the age of 18, and never expressly renounced their citizenship. However, the Central Government never made a determination under Section 9 (2) of the Act in this person’s case. Does this mean the person continues to be a Citizen of India?
I have studied an article on this forum which cited the case law Bhagwati Prasad Dixit vs Rajeev Gandhi AIR 1986 SC 1534, which seems to support the view that unless a determination was made under Section 9(2), citizenship is assumed to continue.
Am I correct in this interpretation?
I welcome any counter arguments and references if any. Thank you!
chandrasekhar
18 July 2017 at 09:11
I am residing in a municipality site. The third party created a document as if she purchased the said property issued notice under section 106 of Transfer of Property Act and and filed rent control case before the tribunal for evicting me as if i am her tenant. I have neither paid any rent to her nor any agreement between us. whether petition before rent control is maintainable or suit for eviction is required
sagar Rao
17 July 2017 at 19:19
SIR/MADAM,
MY ADVOCATE HAD FILED WRITE PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT AGAINST MY NEIGHBOR AND MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR ILLEGAL AND UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTIONS IN AUGUST 2016
MY NEIGHBOR ADVOCATE HAD FILED COUNTER IN OCTOBER 2016, BUT STILL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION STANDING COUNCIL WAS NOT FILED THE COUNTER.
6 MONTHS BACK MY ADVOCATE TOLD ME THAT, CORPORATION STANDING COUNCIL WILL FILED THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT ON THE DAY OF HEARING OF THE CASE IN THE COURT.
ON 01..06.2017 MY CASE WAS LISTED, BUT DUE TO CHANGE OF JUDGE , AFTER SUMMER VACATION MY CASE WAS NOT CAME FOR HEARING AND NOW IT WAS SHOWING IN THE HIGH COURT WEBSITE UNDER CASE STATUS INFORMATION AS CASE IS IN ONWARD LIST.
STILL TODAY MY CASE WAS NOT CAME FOR HEARING, AGAIN I ASKED MY ADVOCATE THAT WHY CASE IS NOT COMING FOR HEARING, HE HAD INFORMED ME THAT DUE TO NOT FILLING OF COUNTER BY CORPORATION STANDING COUNCIL MY CASE WAS NOT COMING FOR HEARING. ONCE HE FILLED COUNTER THEN ONLY CASE WILL COME FOR HEARING.
IN THESE REGARD PLEASE INFORM WHAT IS THE TIME LIMIT TO FILE COUNTER IN THE COURT OF LAW
IF COUNTER WAS NOT FILLED FOR MONTHS AND YEARS, HOW WILL CASE WILL COME FOR HEARING. WHAT IS THE REMEDY PLEASE INFORM.
THANKS
SAGAR
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Harassment issue
If any higher authority financially harassed his subordinate by passing illegal orders and throwing in courts. Courts established prejudicial action. If prejudic action is well proved with documents. Higher officers corruption involvement and protection to corrupt official is also proved. How to take legal action against such officers. And what legal action can be taken for such harassment. Please guide me in detail.
Sumer singh