gangadhar
17 June 2009 at 17:53
dear sir
please reply me various provisions of loss minimization of MACT.
Thinking you
gangadhar
e.mail- gangadhar121978@gmail.com
Khaleel Ahmed Mohammed
15 June 2009 at 18:30
ATTENTION PLOT OWNERS OF SURVEY NO.124/DHA GOPANPALLY VILLAGE OF SERILINGAMPALLY MANDAL OF RANGA REDDY DISTRICT. WHO HAS LOST THEIR PLOTS UNDER SEZ SCHEME ARE ELIGIBLE FOR COMPENSATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITTION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013. FOR MORE DETAILS CONTACT. MOHAMMAD KHALEEL AHMED, ADVOCATE A.P. HIGH COURT HYDERABAD, INDIA. CELL NO.9848574812
visit :www.mkatruelaw.com
SHYAMSUNDAR
15 June 2009 at 16:39
Only the plaint is returned to the plaintiff
The court which returned the plaint says that the new court will call for the records with them.
The new court is asking to file the plaint along with the documents.
What should be done.
Any citations.
thaks.
Amarjeet yadav
14 June 2009 at 16:47
hi,can somebody tell whether we can file a PIL into lower court. a NGO can move a pil in the form of Suit of declartion or anything if it found any illegility in goverment departments etc.plz help me
plz describe me in details as my case is this that one builder in collusion with MCD people got a contract sanctioned to build a school and the documents used by that builder are false and he even does not fulfilled the eligibility criteria. now i want to file a civil suit to get that contract illegal and void. so can i move before the civil court on behalf of a NGO who find all this. plz guide me it's urgent
venkat reddy
13 June 2009 at 08:10
In mortgage by condition sale will morgagee had right to sell the property after expiry of the due date.please let me know.
Gopal Krishna Behera
13 June 2009 at 07:30
When and how can a decree be executed against a legal representative?
venkat reddy
13 June 2009 at 07:25
A has tenancy rights over some lands according to AP tenancy acts and he is fighting for his rights at various courts in the mean time he passed away leaving behind his sons and daughters as legal heirs. recently daughters came to know that their brothers misreprasented them selves and falsely given a AFFIDAVIT before MRO that they are relenquishing their right over the property now how will daughters approach for their rightful share.
Ravinder Sood
12 June 2009 at 21:14
Accounts are being maintained in 'tally'. Computer operator who feeded the data/made entiries has left the job.I had filed a suit for realisation of certain amount on the basis of goods sold on several times and amount received also at several times. In other words, of the difference of the two.I am told that computerised statements are admissible under sec. 65 B of Evidence Act but certain ingredients as mentioned in the section are to be proved before making the print out to be admissible.Pl. send me the details (certificate/affidavit)to be given alongwith the computerised account statement. In my case by whome it will be given.
sandeep chavan
12 June 2009 at 19:08
Under the SRA scheme of Maharashtra government. The Builder has approved the slum on his land using our name appearing in voting list of 1983/84 as needed under the maharashtra state government SRD Scheme. Now he has developed the land showing 74 huts on that land under SRA Scheme. Actually we do not have any concerned on that land we are staying next the said plot of land. We have complained to concern government authority but as usual they are not responding. Now where can we ask for justice. In which court we can file a case? what is the procedure? does the government provide advocate as we cannot afford to hire a advocate? Pl reply.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Civil Procedure Code
I am witnessing a bizzare point at point drafting the petition for the impleading the Legal reps. of the deceased litigation, the court staffs always insist on the impleading deceased and adopting the same cause title with slight modification by insertion of new Legal reps is it right. If someone is dead why should we keep him in all the subsequent Interloqutory applications, I do not object the to keep the name of the deceased in the main petition or the plaint. Can any one enlighten me the statutory warranty in this matter.