Rajasekar
21 July 2009 at 21:25
Can i fila a civil suit against the cellpnone operator seeking injunction against installing cellphone tower.
SHYAMSUNDAR
21 July 2009 at 18:08
Hello friends,
In a suit the plaintiff is a Banking Company. The Branch Manager has not filed the resolution to effect his authority to depose before the court nor any authority letter.
The suit is liable to be dismissed on this count.
Any case laws/citations.
Thanks in advance.
Y V Vishweshwar Rao
21 July 2009 at 15:35
I request lrd friends to Verify and suggest on the followign issue !
One X purchased 200 Square yards in 1990 under Sale agreement with Delivery of possession with Rs;- 100/- NJS - And again purchased 300 Square yards abuttign the said 200 square yards in the year 1998 under Sale Agrement with Delivery of possesison - NJS Rs;- 100/-
In the year 2005 the same vendor executed & Registered Sale deed with reference to the sale agreements of 1990 & 1998 and delivery of possession in the year 1990 & 1998 , in favour of the same Vendee in respect of the both Sale agreemtns( consolidated ) for 500 square yards and required stamp duty is paid on Registered sale Deed as per 2005 rates
Now in a Suit the Regd Sale deed of 2005 , Sale agreements of 1990 & 1998 are filed to prove the dates of transactions & Delivery fo possession as in 1990 & 1998 and delivery of possession to the purchaser .
The Regd Sale deed of 2005 is marked . The sale agreements of 1990 & 1998 with delivery of possession are objected for want of Stamp duty & Penalties & required to be imopounded indipendently .In fact in the sale Deed of 2005 entire stamp duty was paid as per 2005 rates (though sale considerations in 1990 & 1998 were very less)
Whther, the Sale agreement of 1990 & 1998 with delivery of possession, have to be indipendently impounded, inspite of Registration of Sale deed in 2005 on the same land/s and transactions between the same parties ?
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
20 July 2009 at 22:47
HELO ALL LRD EXPERTS
A VEHICAL WAS PARKED WITH THE ON INDICATER IN THE MORNING ON THE DRIVER SIDE MEANS LEFT SIDE ANOTHER TRUCK CAME BEHIND STOPPED VEHICLE WHICH WAS PARKED DUE TO FAILURE OF THE SAID VEHICLE DUE TO CLASH OF TRUCK 2 PERSONS DIED IN THE TRUCK WHO SITTED IN THE TRUCK HOW MUCH THE OWNER AND INSU COMPANY LIABLE FOR THE DEATH OF THE TWO PERSONS
V.V.RAMDAS
20 July 2009 at 21:40
Hi friends,
Can any body provide me the decision of Privicounsil published in A.I.R 1927,PC-page-176. Bhag Chand Vrs Secy. of State for India. This in on 80 C.P.C.
layk
20 July 2009 at 21:11
Sir, I am living in a house with absolutely no agreement regarding rent or other. But I have letter written by the landlord to the local bank manager confirming that I am staying in the house of the land lord and the address of the landlord could be considered as address of mine. I am paying rent regularly -- sometimes to him cash and sometimes by a/c payee cheque -- and now the land lord wants to evict me even without giving any notice. I am asking 3 months time but he is not ready and trying to evict me forcefully. What I can do in such a stage? Please give me the approximate format for getting 144 and for getting injunction against eviction. I have bank account with this address and I have received a lot of letters in this address.
TRIBHUVAN PUROHIT
20 July 2009 at 14:46
Please let me know ..
can secondary evidence of a document be taken on record in writ petition if the original proof is misplaced.
Also please let me know procedures for verification if any.
Awaiting reply
Thanking you
Tribhuvan Purohit
Gaurav mishra
19 July 2009 at 16:46
can a power of attorney be further sub lated, . if power of attorney provider mention in his power of attorney that holder can further sublet it.and it have some legal value any ruling or direction of s.c is available
Adv. Deepak
18 July 2009 at 23:17
Respected Sirs/Madams, Would you please advise me the procedure for formation of social / voluntary organisation.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
section 9
is petition of section 9 of hma is maintanable from husband side, when the petition under section 125 crpc is alrready pending from the side of wife in the court. if yes then is it mandatory to metion the pending petition of 125 in the new petition of section 9 of hma? or to give any reference of pending petion of 125 crpc in new petition of section 9 hma?
plz solve