sood
28 September 2009 at 16:17
Land was acquired by Himachal Pradesh Govt for the ONGC in 1995, The notification was issued, the objections were filed thereafter since 1998 there has been no further hearing, the award has also not been announced by the District Collector. The land is in possession of ONGC (it was in their possession as tenants at the time of notification also). They are not paying rent since 1999 and nor has the land been vacated. Has the land acquisition become infructous and what steps should be taken to get ONGC to pay the previous rental and vacate the land.
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
28 September 2009 at 12:48
car's driver make accident by a tree to save a cow,and he become injurd ,can he file m.a.c.t. case ?
Ashu
27 September 2009 at 20:04
if bonafide purchaser denied the previous agreement, then the onus to prove the previous agreement exist goes on the plaintiff or the bonafide purchaser.......if on plaintiff, then please submit any case law
Adv. Deepak
27 September 2009 at 16:33
Resp. Experts, What does Law of Limitation say about the acts defined in Domestic Violence Act as "domestic violence"? Can wife file application for any act done by husband before 4/5 years prior to their living separately. In my case, husband is living separate from wife for more than 4 years. Wife filed domestic violence application claiming that husband has committed domestic violence before 5 years, when they were living together? What could be my defence in such case? Is such application by wife maintainable under the law? Your expert advise is highly solicited. Regards. Adv. Deepak
Bhushan V. Kale
26 September 2009 at 14:29
Our factory is getting power supply from the electricity pole standing at western side of building, since last more than 40 yrs. Said pole is nearby the building and most safe.
All of a sudden, MSEDCL (Maharashtra Stat Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.) cut the power supply from that pole and connected it from the pole standing at northern side of building.
There is Govt. road in between the factory building and newly connected pole. heavy traffic flowing throuth the road. There is public as well as privet nuicense.
I have file suit for mandatory injunction against the MSEDCL along with the appliction of temporary injunction.
is there any chanse of success ?
pls. inform me if there are some rulings in favour or against me.
Thanks.
kranthi kiran
26 September 2009 at 12:39
A has been issued with 38-E, Ownership Certificate, under A.P.(T.A) Tenancy & Agril Lands Act. The said certificate issued to A with the consent of the Protected Tenent only. A is daughter's son of Protected Tenant. After 33 Years the said order is challenged by the sons of the Protected Tenant (P.T)before the High Court in the Year 2007. Apart from that the sons of said P.T filed a suit for partition before the District Court in the year 2009. The sons already know taht the land is already alienated by A way back in 2005 and have even stated the same in the Plaint. The subsequent vendees are also made parties. My client is one of the such boandfide purchaser.
Can the property be treated as ancestral.
Does the suit is barred by limitation, though there is no limitation for filing partition suit.
Please give some suggetions for preparing for W.S
Amandeep Singh
24 September 2009 at 23:00
Sir
My father has signed a compromise under influence and threat by a person for sale of the property and that compromise was signed in the court because that person had filed false cases and police complaints against us and we have copy of such complaints.Pls suggest valid grounds for filling an appeal for setting aside such compromise or consent decree.riven
rajvinder singh
24 September 2009 at 21:08
my query,sir but i confused sir i am confused because additional evidence will take place only when the evidence has already been taken place before lower court.in my case evidence has not taken place .now at this stage should i move application under 41 r 27 or simply move an application for placing the photos on fie
riven
kuruvanagaraju
24 September 2009 at 19:31
. I belong to Alur kurnool (Dist) of Andhrapradesh and presently residing in Jodhpur, Rajasthan. With an ambition to support my family and to get self employed I contacted “M/s VENUS TRADING COMPANY, WZ-508/1, Basai Dara Pur, Behind Ramesh nagar Metro Station Delhi-110015 ” based on their advertisement placed in the daily news papers “Rajasthan Patrika” and “Dainik Bhaskar”. After going through their website www.venustradingco.com and written material supplied by them I paid them Rupees 2000/-(Two Thousand) in advance vide bill no 507 dated 18 Apr 2009 and later I paid the Rupees 48,000/-(Forty Eight Thousand) for the six head thread winding machine. As per the agreement they have to supply the raw material of 240 kg/week and pay the labour charges of Rs 35/Kg for the finished goods what we supply to them. With the machine they supplied only 40 kg of the raw material which is costing Rs 900/- and after finishing 18 Kg of the raw material we sent back to them. Till now the company has not paid the labour charges and not supplying the raw material and not returned the agreement which I sent back for correction in respect of transportation charges.
3. The original cost of the machine supplied by them is only Rs 27,000/-(Twenty Seven Thousand ) as per the original bill received by me where the company received Rs 50,000/- from me. Besides over charging they supplied me a faulty machine. The company neither rectifying the faulty machine and nor replacing and not supplying any raw material. My repeated letters for the return of the machine to the company became unclaimed
hence i request you suggestion and helpriven
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Stamp Paper
I have to execute an agreement urgently,, but the Stamp Vendor will remain closed during the Durga Puja vacation,, so unable to buy stamp paper on names..
Is there any way out?