farooq
13 April 2010 at 12:31
Hello, My Grandfather has some property on his name and he did't write or sell anything to anyone it was then distributed between my father and his brother(my uncle) now half the property belongs to my father in which my brother is enjoying the rice mill from last 25 years any though its consist of both plain land and a rice mill, we all(my brothers and sisters) had our share now he is telling that it belongs to him only, some our brothers and sisters are taking his side.
can you tell me does still we had our chance to get it back ? what the procedure for that and how much % we will get for each sister and each brother?
does only the persons will get share who raise the case or all the children?
please help me and tell me how much time it will take through court procedure.
Thanks in advance.
pratik
13 April 2010 at 10:58
What do u mean by miscellaneous proceedings as per cpc, 1908 section 141 .
The bare act text is as follws.
141. Miscellaneous proceedings.
The procedure provided in this Code in regard to suit shall be followed, as far as it can be made applicable, in all proceedings in any Court of civil jurisdiction.
1[Explanation.-In this section, the expression "proceedings" includes proceedings under Order IX, but does not include any proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution.]
Thanking u all experts in advance.
pratik
13 April 2010 at 10:51
As per CPC, 1908 Section 150 what do u mean by transfer of business.
The bare act text is as follows.
150. Transfer of business.
Save as otherwise provide, where the business of any Court is transferred to any other Court, the Court to which the business is so transferred shall have the same powers and shall perform the same duties as those respectively conferred and imposed by or under this Code upon the Court from which the business was so
transferred.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
Anonymous
13 April 2010 at 10:50
Hellow everybody.
Our collegues are contesting a case relating to seniority in supreme court. Their opposite parties (petitoners of SLP) are ad-hoc employees while they are regular employees selected through SSC. The case is at admission stage and is pending in registrar office for the last six months for want of service of notice. By the attitude of the OPs it appears that they are trying to delay the matter as long as they can because of the fact that they are apprehensive of losing the case in SC which will render them terminated from the service. Now, I want to ask is there any statutory time limit to dispose of this case or how long the matter may be kept pending in registrar office by the OPs. Please give your opinion urgently as the promotion of various other employees are held up because of stay granted by the SC in an interim order on first hearing. Please also suggest as to what can be done to expedite this case. Thanks.
pratik
13 April 2010 at 10:47
1) As per CPC, 1908 Order 20 Rule 1 what do u mean by open court .
2) What do u mean by every affidavit shall be drawn up in the first person. (Meaning of the line if written under the every starting line of the affidavit).
3)meaning of pecuniary limits as per section 6 of the civil procedure code, 1908 & what does it says.
Thanking u all experts in advance.
Anonymous
13 April 2010 at 08:36
Regarding admission of documents through defedant by the plantiff
Anonymous
12 April 2010 at 22:19
Sirs,
Pl let me know whethter an immoveable property can be sold before the mortagage is released by the financing bank or Co., ir Instution.
The loan money is cleared to the last pie.
Thanks
allurisivajiraju
12 April 2010 at 20:49
Respected Seniors.
In Order 38 Rule 5 of CPC, at the time of conditional attachment, one 3rd party involved and given his property towards security to the suit debt. Subsequently suit was decreed. In execution is there attachment is required to the property given by 3rd party or not?
Thanking in advance.
Anonymous
12 April 2010 at 19:05
Dear Experts of the forum,
Please Guide me; (This pertains to the State Of AP and Telangana area.)
A person 'F' (Inam Dhar) obtains permission from panchayat (Then , now it is G H M C , Hyderabad ) for plotting an agricultural, Inam Land in the year 1959 and sells 95% of the land. In 1993 state govt. acquires some land for road widening fixes compensation and in last moment stops payment saying it is Inam land and some PT 'M ' is also there and refers the matter to the civil court.
Under the above conditions :
1) what 'F' should do?
2) Can 'F' apply for Patta of the land on the basis of holding the land on cut of date ie 20-07-1955 ( In the state of AP, Under the Hyderabad Abolition of Inam Act. 8 of 1955).
3) Can 'F ' approach court for the same as stated 2) above.
4) Or is there any alternatives you suggest , as a solution?
With regards, Thanking you ALL for a QUICK reply ( as this is little URGENT nature please )!
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
ancestral property
I am a 45yr lady, my father has got property through settlement deed from my grand father, can I claim this property as ancestral property