Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   11 December 2010 at 09:59

Suit For Injunction

We filed a suit for injunction regarding not to interfere in construction work and the court granted temporary injunction in our favour. Now the main suit is pending and in the meantime the construction work has been complete.No condition was imposed by the court while granting temporary injunction. So my query is that in this situation can we withdraw our suit because the construction work has been done.

Anonymous   11 December 2010 at 07:00

About Court Marriage where boy is studying at US presently and girl lives in India.

Dear All,
Is it possible fro two indians to get married in US.
The boy is in US right now pursuing MS and girl is in India. They want to get married and settle in US.
Kindly provide the way.
thnx

Vidhyut Kargutkar   11 December 2010 at 02:00

Kindly answer my question

hello experts. i have posted my query in Forum under Civil Law sub-cat. Succession on 8th but till now not even a single response has come. sorry to post here again but i need to know urgently.

http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Confusion-created-by-revenue-dept-mah-if-executing-judgemen-28226.asp

RUPESH GAKHAR   11 December 2010 at 00:38

APPEAL AGAINST FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION

Q.
AN ANCESTRAL PROPERTY WAS DIVIDED BETWEEN 4 BROTHERS & ONE UNMARRIED SISTER IN 1988 VIDE FINAL DECREE OF COURT.
THERE WERE TWO MARRIED SISTERS AT THAT TIME WHO WERE NOT MADE PARTY IN THE COMPROMISE PETITION.

QUERY,
HINDU SUCCESSION ( AMMENDMENT)ACT 2005, PROVIDES AN EXCEPTION THAT THE ACT SHALL NOT APPLY TO
REGISTERED PARTION DEED OR PARITION AFFECTED BY DECREE OF COURT.

SO WHETHER THOSE TWO UNMARRIED SISTERS CAN CLAIM SHARE IN THE DIVIDED PROPERTY.
IF YES THEN WHETHER THERE IS ANY TIME LIMIT

Anonymous   10 December 2010 at 22:20

Election Petition

Res. Sirs,

In an Anchal segment of 17 Anchal Samiti Members, a non-confidence motion was moved against its Chairperson. The required members to pass the non-confidence motion is 2/3rd of the total members. This 2/3rd works out to be 11.3

The total No. of votes in favour of non-confidence was 11; a shortfall of 0.3. In this case, Division Bench rejected the non-confidence motion and ruled that 2/3rd means 11.3. Hence no-confidence with only 11 members is failure.

But we see vote can’t be cut into pieces. If rounding of number is taken into account, the nearest number is 11.

Is there any ruling of the SC that passed in favour of the no-confidence motion in the aforesaid case? Please help.

natarasan   10 December 2010 at 22:17

adoption

pl. enlighten me weather adoption is permissable for christians in india

sangeetha   10 December 2010 at 22:17

GPA

hello
Is it very neccessary for a GPA holder to convert agricultural land into residential layouts before executing saledeed

Anonymous   10 December 2010 at 21:08

endorsement on back of promissory note

whether stamp need for the endorsement on back of promissory note under indian stamp act or other laws

kindly cite citation regards

Sanjeev Mittal   10 December 2010 at 17:05

Will

Our Client has two son, one is died in road accident & his wife is divorcee ( Divorce Case is pending) Now our client want to make a will in favour of his alive son.

Pls. advise us that above will can revocaked/ challanged by divorcee wife or her successer.

Arunagiri   10 December 2010 at 17:02

Transfer in Public Sector - Handicapped Employees / Employees having handicapped children

Dear Legal Experts,

Please tell me is there any legal protection against transfer for employees who are handicapped/ having handicapped dependents in Govt/ State Govt./ PSUs/ PSBs.

Whether such transfer is applicable only to Junior level officers for all category of employees?

Which is the right forum to address such transfers as the employer do not consider the request sympathetically?