Anonymous
07 February 2011 at 18:02
where Aggrieved Company employees can approach to seek grievances against Company who were having international head Office?Thank you.
V. Ramakrishna
07 February 2011 at 16:56
further to my query on the subject I would be greatfull if Experts on the forum can up load the judgement cited below
Guidelines to approach the problem of sufficient cause In "Collector,Land Acuisition,Anantang v M/s M S T Katji" ,,
AIR 1987 SC 1353
Regards
Ramakrishna
shankar
07 February 2011 at 16:53
X and Y are husband and wife, X filed for custody of child under guardians Act, who is a Muslim (shia sec.)
The Court passed orders without giving any opportunity to lead evidence by wife.
Wife preferred an appeal, pending in Highcourt, and no stay is granted
in the meantime husband filed EP for custody of child, the court passed orders to that effect without serving any notice to the wife
kindly advise me how can i defend on behalf of wife
thanking you
asr, adv.
V. Ramakrishna
07 February 2011 at 16:30
Request for judgement
********************
In a money suite exparte decree/, a delay in filing appeal against the decree , may be condoned ,without going into day to day reasons ,
I am given to understand justice Bhanumathi
of Madras High Court , has given a judgement
on the subject
I would be great full to the experts on this forum to up load the judgement copy
Also related judgement vide AIR 2000 SC1221
may pl be up loaded .
Regards
Ramakrishna
Anonymous
07 February 2011 at 15:33
sir , pls. let me know what is the diffrence between plaint and suit
regards
Anonymous
07 February 2011 at 12:24
i purchased a flat on the basis of poa given by the daughter to the father,made part payment to the father but now the father claims that he does not have the authority to sell the flat as it is not a registered poa.although the poa contains the words "sale and dispose off".plssssss help!!!!!!suggest meaures plss.
Anonymous
07 February 2011 at 11:55
In a Civil Suit a Registration Department made a benami document valid in a court of law and also gave false evidence in support of the same so as to benefit the Plaintiff.
The Suit was decreed against the defendant. Suit Properties was enjoyed by the Plaintiff till date.
After 15 years a 340 CrPC petition (Petition U/s 340 CrPC) was filed in the said suit against the Registration Department bringing in light the fraud of the Registration Department. Show cause notices was issued to the Registration Department by the Court.
Registration Department Heads failed to appear and was set-exparte in the said petition.
Now that the Registration Department has accepted their false evidence and since the document doesn't qualify itself in said suit WILL THE COURT SUSTAIN THE SAME DECREE OR WILL IT CANCEL IT IN LIGHT OF THE 340 CRPC PETITION?
Anonymous
07 February 2011 at 11:18
CAN I HOUSING SOCIETY RECOVER LEGAL CHARGES FROM A MEMBER?
THE SOCIETY SAYS THE G.B. HAS PASSED A RESOLUTION WAY BACK IN 1990 AND HENCE THEY RECOVER THE LEGAL CHARGES ON ALL LITIGATION
EXPENSES FROM MEMBER CONCERNED.
THIS WAY THE MEMBER NEED TO PAY LEGAL EXPENSES TO HIS LAWYER AND ALSO ALL LEGAL EXPENSES TO SOCIETY LEGAL EXPENSES ON WHICH THE MEMBER HAS NO SAY. THIS IN EFFECT PAYING TWO CHARGES FOR LITIGATION ON A ISSUE.
IS THIS FUNDAMENTALLY CORRECT IN VIEW OF CONTITUTIONAL FREEDEOM ENCHIRNED ?
IF THIS IS CORRECT NO MEMBER CAN LITIGATE AS HE WILL HAVE TO PAY HUGE MONEY AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM GETS CORRUPT AS THE LAYWERS
JUST FUNCTION AT TIMES AS BROKERS OF JUDUCIAL ORDER AND MEMBER GET HARRASSED.
AN ARGUMENT WHY THE OTHER MEMBERS FOOT THE EXPENSES? THEN WHY AT ALL HAVE LITIGATION PROCEES AND ACT & RULES ? LET THE DECISION OF G.B.BECOMES SUPREME ABOVE LAW AND ACT.
EVEN THE MEMBER MEETS THE PART OF EXPENSES AS HE IS CONTRIBUTING TO EXPENSE OF SOCIETY.
THE CORRECT INTELECT SHOULD SAY THAT SOCIETY SHOULD NOT CHARGE ANY LEGAL EXPENSES ON ANY LITIGATION TO THE MEMBER
AND SOCEITY SHOULD LITIGATE AS PER ACT & RULES IN THE INTEREST OF MEMBERS.
CAN YOU SIGHT ANY MUMBAI HIGH COURT OR CO-OPERATIVE COURT RULING ON THIS?
THANKS,
VAIDYANATHAN.
Anonymous
06 February 2011 at 22:42
Hi,
My query is my friend had purchased site by way of registered GPA(paying due stamp duty) and also has a separate agreeement declaring a receipt of sale consideration. This was on 2009 and now its come 2 his knowledge that executant has since expired with no heirs.Request guidance on:
1)Whether the GPA holds any validity, considering that it is registered?
2)If my friend intends to sell to 3rd party, what would be the correct procedure considering that the executant has no legal heirs?
Pls advice.....
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Police Intervention in civil matters
Dear Sirs,
This is regarding a shared property belonging to my Late Grandmother where in my 3 aunties and my late father are legal heirs. Few months ago they tried to get the khatha transferred onto their name for which I had given an objection with the BBMP and later issued a legal notice. In December they had called me for a discussion and I took my lawyer and explained to the RO saying that I am in the process of filing a suit and not to transfer the khata on their names and I and brothers are legal heirs of my late father. Somehow BBMP have issued a condition Khatha onto their names and after that I have filed the partition suit. They coming to know about this lodged a false complaint against me and my wife. The police are not ready to listen to anything I have to say and tells me that "they being old women’s their support will be towards them no matter what mistakes they do. As the police commissioner has advised them that khata holders to be given more importance and said that I am a guest staying with them and if I do not abide with them, I will have to face consequences. How do I go about it, please reply at the earliest.
Thanks & Regards
Sanjay Paul Arvind F
Austin Town, Bangalore