rahul k
14 April 2011 at 19:05
Can a person who is a director of a private company after completion of LLB degree get enrol in the state Bar council without renouncing his title and post? Are there any judgements other than bhupinder kumar sharma v. Bar assn. pathankot that discuss this issue in greater detail? Also what are the statutory provisions dealing with the same issue?
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 17:41
what rate Taxes on residential flat of rent to be paid
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 16:33
sir,
I RAISED A QUESTION WHETHER THERE ANY JUDGMENTS GIVEN IN FAVOUR OF ONE WHO MADE AN UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION IN THE COMMON AREA OF APARTMENT EVEN AFTER THE CORPORATION HAS REJECTED THEIR APPLICATION FOR REGULARIZASTION.
OUR EXPERT HAS GIVEN AN ANSWER THAT THE COURT CANNOT REGULARIZE AN ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION AND IT IS THE JOB OF THE MUNICIPALITY.
MY QUESTON NOW IS HOW CAN THE PARTY WHO HAVE APPLIED FOR THE REGULARIZASTION AND WHICH WAS DULY REJECTED BY THE CORPORATION GO FOR RELIEF FROM THE COURT.
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 16:06
Dear Sir/Madam
My name is M. Ravinder as i am practising as tax consultant since 20 years and i had completed my LLB graduation and now i have enrolled as an Advocate from State of Andhra Pradesh. Sir, is there any particular issue with my practising as a tax consultant, while doing my advocate practice. Please let me know if any further issues.
With Warm Regards
M. Ravinder.
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 15:36
ABC filed a civil suit against XYZ, wherein ABC made around 1 to 13 allegations and narrations of facts and claimed relief.
XYZ filed the counter and opposed the relief sought and also denied the allegations as follows:
1. At the start, Summary denial of all allegations and facts and relief sought.
2. Facts 1 to 5, 9-10, 13 denied explicitly.
3. Made many new counter allegations 14 to 19 in regards to facts 6-8,11,12 alleged in plaint, but although not denied those allegations XYZ alleged it as 'a one sided story and a deceitful attempt by plaintiff' to mislead the court.
ABS did never file any response on WS by XYZ and to new allegations 14 to 19 untill ABC's exam-in-chief.
Currently, XYZ's direct chief exam is just concluded wherein XYZ asserting that "14 to 19 be taken as 'admitted facts' by ABC" and hence no need to prove those facts.
Can ABS deny the existance of facts 14 to 19 NOW?
What is the way out for ABC to deny it at this jucture?
Law does not make it mandatory to file "subsequent pleadings".
It is discretionary. Hence ABC did not get opportunity to file say to new allegations in WS.
Hence it is not 'an admitted fact' as law/judge never prescribed ABC to file any response to new allegations in XYZ's WS.
It seems that even XYZ hasn't got the proofs to prove it, but XYZ seems to have relied on ABS's omission to deny it explicitly.
Will above justification be maintenable? What is the way out for ABC?
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 15:34
Respected All,
if in any arbitration proceeding by mistake plaintiff has filed blank document then what legal effect occured on it.pls make guidence to me about this.
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 14:21
1)Can anybody tell me the meaning of counter-affidavit & proof affidavit.
2)On which among the following, a garnishee order is not applicable?.
Answer : amount deposited by the customer after receipt of the garnishee order.
Query : Pls provide me the case law or section it which says that amount deposited by the customer after receipt of the garnishee order. But the above provision is also applicable to attachment order.
Granishee orders are applicable in civil matters, tax recovery matters, revenue matters & attachemtn order are applicable in DV cases, Maintenance cases & criminal cases ..................RIGHT ............OR.....................WRONG.
give the opinion on the above matter & the meaning of querie (1)
Thanks.
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 12:19
We are tenants and inspite of several complaints and even filing of a petition BMC is not giving us permission to carry out structural repairs to dilapidated building. Pl. what will happen to our tenanancy rights in the even building collapses ? Pl. suggest a way so that we can protect our tenancy rights.
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 10:50
DEAR SIR
1. A PERSON IS NOT DISQUALIFIED TO CHOSEN A MEMBER OF MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION U/S 39 IF HIS BROTHERS ARE WORKING AS LECTURER AND CLERK PRIOR TO HIS ELECTION.
2. IS A REFERENCE U/S 68 CAN BE MADE TO THE CHANCELLOR BY A PERSON OTHER THAT THE AGGRIEVED PERSON.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Review.
1) The power once delegated cannot be delegated further this is one of the principle of natural justice. This is in terms of POA any case law that executing a Power-of-Attorney by the Principal in which the Attorney is empowered to execute further Powers-of-Attorney on behalf of the Principal. Any clarification would be appreciated.
2) Civil Procedure code, 1908 (Review)
Sub rule 6. Application where rejected
(1) Where the application for a review is heard by more than one Judge and the Court is equally divided, the application shall be rejected.
So what do u mean by court is equally divided how can a review application is dismissed by the judge means confused that when a court is divided means what either the sub section is talking about the division bench or what ?
Thanks to all .