seema arora
16 April 2011 at 02:50
Dear Experts
Is this possible a suit can be sold on percentage basis ie some third party will fight for my share and pay me upfront and take % of my share
Anonymous
15 April 2011 at 20:30
High Court Judicature At Bombay
Minutes Retrieval- Case Number Wise
Stamp No./Regn. No.
What do u mean by (Stamp No./Regn. No.) & (Minutes Retrieval- Case Number Wise).
2) 9. Bar of certain applications
No application to review an order made on an application for a review or a decree or order passed or made on a review shall be entertained.
It means that one’s the review is done than 2 review is not possible right. But if the party what’s to make the 2 review than what revision or appeal.
A party who is not appealing from a decree on order may apply for a review of judgment notwithstanding the pendency of an appeal by some other party except where the ground of such appeal is common to the applicant and the appellant, or when, being respondent, he can present to the Appellate Court the case on which he applies for the review.
It means the review can be preferred also when there is a appeal by the respondent or appellant because the ords notwithstanding is mentioned.
Thnaks.
Anonymous
15 April 2011 at 20:25
We were tenants of a public trust and the trust sold the property to builders in 2006. Subsequent to that builder has filed eviction cases in the Small Cause Court at Bandra. BMC has issued notice to builders to repair the building and have threatened criminal prosucation. Builders have taken umbrage of this and have filed Writ Petition No. WP/680/2011 in High Court which is in Pre Admission stage against BMC and the tenants saying building is irrepairable by creating fake audit report from VJTI saying that we are not cooperating with them as they want to redevelope the building. We can not trust builder and desire that tenancy premises be converted in Ownership as is the practice in Mumbai but the builder is not accepting this. What will be fate of writ petition as we have been told that builder should have gone to small cause court for this. Will High Court dismiss the petition? What alternate action we can take in the matter. Pl. advice.
Anonymous
15 April 2011 at 20:13
Postal Index Number (PIN) is a 6 digit code and understanding how PIN works is simple:
The first two digits of the PIN indicates the sub-region or one of the postal circles.
The first three digits of the PIN indicates a sorting/revenue district.
The last three digits of the PIN refer to the delivery Post Office.
So what is the meaning of Revenue district & sub region for the abov mention.
Anonymous
15 April 2011 at 19:48
1) What do u mean by advocate code there are more than 867 code in the PDF file. The file can be seen for this site http://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/index.html bombay high court side. Second last for the leftside . so actually what do u mean by advocate code & importants. ?
2) Also what do u mean by Expedited Matters & warn list of CPC & framing issue & Provisional Board as this words are mentioned under the abovementioned site same direction left hand side .
Thanks
Do help me out as a law student 2 year.
Anonymous
15 April 2011 at 19:32
The highest body of the Maharashtra judiciary is the Bombay High Court under which there are the Subordinate Courts which serve the districts and the City Civil Courts. The Bombay High Court can exercise original jurisdiction over the state of Maharashtra, Goa, Daman and Diu. It has benches in the cities of Bombay, Aurangabad, Nagpur and Panaji in Goa. The Bombay High Court can exercise both original and appellate jurisdiction in Bombay. The Bombay High Court can have maximum of 64 judges.
Query : the above mentioned is a good info but my query is that in the above mentioned para it has said that
(The Bombay High Court can exercise both original and appellate jurisdiction in Bombay) So as it has said in the the above para that the court has various bench in (Aurangabad, Nagpur and Panaji in Goa) so if this states what's to file a appeall in the court than they have to come to bombay because the Bombay has the appellate & oirignal jurisdiction & the other state (Aurangabad, Nagpur and Panaji in Goa) have only original juridisction . Pls correct me.
In the last para it has been said that
(The Bombay High Court can have maximum of 64 judges. )
so where it has been mentioned in the law that the particular HC should not exceed the limit of the judge they should have or the minimum judge they should have because it has also been said that SC has only 30 judge that is the maxmium.
So were it has been stated in the law that the any court should hold minimum & maxmium judges in the court. whether it is as per the court rules or any other law.
Thanks.
Anonymous
15 April 2011 at 18:57
R/Experts,
Plz. guide me on following query.
A adopted B with the consent of wife C,before 30 years.C died before 20 years.B married D and they have 2 sons.
Now A going to divest B's share from ancestral property and try to donate entire ancestral property.
* Is B have any right to restrain A from his illegal act?
* Can B and his two sons claim for partition of this ancestral property?what will be their share?
* Can B or his two sons (through next friend) restrain A by filing perpetual injunction suit?
Anonymous
15 April 2011 at 18:42
Dear sir,
I am a law student. My query is that by what procedure of law I can correct my name, my parent’s name and my D.O.B. in my educational certificates. I have to correct these errors from my mark memo of 10th, 12th, B.A., and L.L.B. Actually the names given in these memo are not properly given with sir name and D.O.B. is also not correct.
Please help me sir.
Anonymous
15 April 2011 at 17:19
Respected sir,
My wife has filed false and febricated DV against me and my family members. We have got planty of evidences to prove that DV is false and febricated. And she is not submitting the evidences since Apr 2010. She has also getting maintence for the child since 2007 on false and febricated grounds. we have sufficient profs to prove that. Her maintenance was dissmissed by matrimaonial court on false and febricated grounds.Now She has given a statementin family court in child custody case that she is capable to maintain the child alone and she also stated that she will not allow the child to meet his father. And even after number of order she did not bring the child in the court to meet with his father. Is there any citation of SC of HC of punjab and haryana to wave the maintence of the child as my wife is gtg m ore than 25000/- Pm and where as I am hardly gtg 10 to 12k only by running a ver small shop is the house and my wife is post graduate whedre as i am hardly 10 th passed. Request advice.
swith kind regards. In Dv prayer she asked for 498A/406 only and whereas she has also filed 498a/406/506 seperately u/s 156(3).
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Dead Lock created by employer
Dear Sir,
Kindly get out from the puzzle created by my employer
The detail facts narrated are as follows:
I am working on adhoc basis since 1998 and CAT in Feb 2010 has allowed my petition pertaining to selection of post held in year 2001 and directed my employer to regularize my services from year 2001 and I was on adhoc tenure which was expiring on 30.06.2010 cat in feb 2010 has given direction to provide regular appointment within 3 months. After expiration of tenure I made the representation in July 2010 for the implementation of order which was no replied thereafter, I made the contempt petition in August 2010 . The employer has recovered my salary from the bank account for the month of July 2010 but has submitted before the CAT in Sept 2010 that they will disburse within 2 days . The employer move to High Court and the order was send for remand. I made the representation of the adhoc tenure in October 2010 for extending the adhoc tenure beyond 30th July 2010 which was rejaected at the end of Nov 2010 and I was asked to leave the Office without handling the copy of order. I challenged the Order of High Court send for remand before supreme Court by the way of SLP which was dismissed. i filed the separate petition before the CAT FOR NOT PROVIDING THE ADHOC EXTENSION BEYOND 30.06.2010
The employer has made the reply that the I had not applied the adhoc extension only in October 2010 that's why they have declined and has justified its action that I have not received relief on different issues so I also lose the right for continuation
Please inform whether its justified because the Hon'ble Tribunal was in force till Employer has choose to challenge it only on October 2010 and how can I plead or made representation for extension of adhoc tenure prior to this and I did it as soon as it became ineffective ?