Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   05 May 2011 at 11:17

RTI ACT 2005

Dear all

I want some information regarding land documents. So I applied to PIO (Tahsidar) by register post under the RTI Act, 2005. After completion of 30 days also I could not get any information and feedback from PIO. In this regard I need some information:

1. Whether we can apply for information by registered post addressing to PIO or not?

2. I sent my application by registered post and I enclosed acknowledgement card, but they did not send me Acknowledgement card that they have received my letter.

3. Can I go for appeal?

Please suggest me.

Thanking you all.

Gowri shankar   05 May 2011 at 10:34

consumer

Hello sir,
i booked a hyundai verna on december 2010 and i payed some token advance......and loan sanctioned in 2011 january and vechicle got registered in january....but in RC book the model number registered as 2010/6......almost 6 most depriciation........is there any way to put case against hyundai regarding this to get the depriciation cost

please give me advice

Anonymous   05 May 2011 at 08:26

Loan closure from co-op bank

I was a guarantor along with 2 others in a loan case of my brother which was taken from a co-operative bank in Maharashtra. Since my brother was not able to repay the said loan and he was not in touch with anyone of us, we guarantors, finally managed to repay the entire loan amount with interest to the bank as per the bank's settlement policy. Now, after repaying the entire amount, the bank is not giving us the 'Loan clearance certificate, nor it's giving us an 'NOC' to cancel the attachment to our properties! The Bank initially asked us to surrender our individual shares back to the bank by personally visiting the Bank H.O. only! Whereas, we have sent such written request for surrendering our shares to the bank by registered AD. Only my brother, the main loan applicant is not available nor in touch with any one of us for surrendering his shares back to the bank.The bank is deliberately avoiding our plea for giving us the Clearance and NOC, by asking for my brother to be present personally to surrender his shares to the bank! I smell something fishy in this matter, as the bank has recovered the entire loan amount from us, the guarantors and now they have to give us the clearance certificate as well as free our properties from their attachments on 7/12 extracts! I request the legal opinion on the issue by experts.
Regards

Anonymous   05 May 2011 at 08:20

Can one challange a decree / order under Consent terms?

Is it possible for any one who is party to an order / decree passed by City Civil Court in 2009 under consent terms to challange it in the higher courts in 2011 and obtain any kind of relief or stay in execution of the order / decree ? Experts pl. give appropriate advice.

Anonymous   04 May 2011 at 22:17

Contract Act

I am doing a business of packers and movers. I have book one truck of XYZ transport for shifting a household goods from Vadodara to Nepal and for that purpose i had paid Rs. 45000/- to XYZ transport. But before reaching goods to Nepal due to negligency of truck driver , truck met with accident and my goods also damaged. More over, transporter had told me that come personally at the place of accident and collect your goods , i am not responsible if goods are theft from the place of accident. More over transporter also deny to return Rs. 45000/- which i had paid for contract . Can i file a suit U/s 73 of Contract Act or under any other section ?

mahendrakumar   04 May 2011 at 18:12

Remanded back to cdrf

a case filed by the op against the cdrf judgement at state forum has been remanded back to cdrf.

what could be further stages of the case now?

after filing the op's version and cross examining the petitioner and exhibits,the op absended thereafter wards and the case was decided without the op's presence.

since case is remanded back to the cdrf,can both side submit fresh evidence and arguments ? Or only the op will be permiitted to submit his evidence?




































Anonymous   04 May 2011 at 18:11

common area expenses distribution in mutistorey.

I live in a multistory apartment of 6.25 acres having flats of different sizes staring from 1 bed room to 4 bed room in kanpur UP.
The common services are done by the builders but charged from us as per the area of the flat which i have opposed citing ruling of the Bombay High Court in 2002.

The builders are adamant that their method is right as the bigger flat owners are enjoying more servies wich they are not able to explain as no flat owner is geting any services within the flat premises.

the small flat holders are being charged less so they are happy with the rule but the 3 & 4 bed room flat holders have to bear the inflationary effect every year.
I have also tried to show this Bombay High Court ruling to the flat owners and builders but they say it is of the Maharashtra so does not apply here in UP.

Attached is the ruling of Bombay High Court.

please advice !!!!

Anonymous   04 May 2011 at 17:46

Contarct Act

Mera Movers and Packers ka Business hai.Maine Vadodara se Nepal house hold goods shift karne ke liye ek truck book karai thi KYZ ke transport se.uske liye maine XYZ ko 45000/- paid kiye the. lekin truck Nepal pahuche uske pahle hi Driver ki bedarkari se Accident hua aur mere Goods ko nuksaan bhi hua . Baad me truck owner i.e. transporter ne bola ki aapka goods yaha Udaypur ke pas pada hai , aap khud hi aakar le jao . Goods chori ho ya kuch nuksan ho to meri jimmedari nahi hai.Maine usko 45000/- Rs. vapas karne ko kaha lekin usne mana kar diya. Goods ko nuksan hone ki vajah se muje goods vapas Vadodara lana pada aur dusre trasport ko uske liye maine Rs.44000/- paid kiye aur baad me anya transport ke through goods Nepal bheja. Kya me Contract Act ke Section 73 ke mutabit Civil Court me Transporter ke samne case file kar sakta hu. Please Reply

Anonymous   04 May 2011 at 17:38

issues framed

can new issues discussed in SC witch were never raised before(lower courts& high court).

Anonymous   04 May 2011 at 17:30

common services expense share in multistoryed apartment

I live in a multistory apartment of 6.25 acres having flats of different sizes staring from 1 bed room to 4 bed room.
The common services are done by the builders but charged from us as per the area of the flat which i have opposed citing ruling of the Bombay High Court in 2002.

The builders are adamant that their method is right as the bigger flat owners are enjoying more servies wich they are not able to explain as no flat owner is geting any services within the flat premises.

the small flat holders are being charged less so they are happy with the rule but the 3 & 4 bed room flat holders have to bear the brunt every year.
please help on this issue