Anonymous
22 May 2011 at 11:54
1) What do u mean by prohibitory order& Granishee order
2) Only interim orders & Interlocutory application can be passed without ordering notice to the other side.
Thanks
Anonymous
22 May 2011 at 11:37
sir,
suppose mr A is the lawyer of B in case title C VS B u/s 138 n.i.act and mr A also represents C in another case u/s 138 n.i.act in case title C VS D.
is there any contravention of any code of conduct by mr A under advocates act??
if yes then what is the procedure of filing complaint against mr A? PLZ GUIDE
Member (Account Deleted)
22 May 2011 at 00:00
hello experts, i need a help...can anyone provide me the chart of pecuniary jurisdiction? i mean according to pecuniary valuation which court has jurisdiction to hear a particular case? thanx & regards,
Member (Account Deleted)
21 May 2011 at 23:32
good evening experts,
can anyone provide me the chart of pecuniary jurisdiction??i mean according to pecuniary valuation which court has jurisdiction to hear a particular case???
thanx & regards,
Anonymous
21 May 2011 at 20:46
Dear Experts,
Courts have always said that:-
"Stay of Execution" of a Money decree is normally not granted, and in only exceptional cases it may be granted.
Different rule of thumb is applied if decree is in regards to 'immovable property'.
I want to now the logic behind it.
Please post a SC citation where money decree's execution is stayed in appeal.
Member (Account Deleted)
21 May 2011 at 19:58
Court fee is calculated on the basis of what you are asking relief from court and not necessarily the cost of your land.
Is it true in civil suits or mandatory injunction like in nuisance case ?
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/required-citation-or-law--190476.asp
Anonymous
21 May 2011 at 14:28
Please inform the limitation to challenge the illegal and de hores order. Can it be challenge after the gap of a long time? I think that illegal and de hores order can be challenge any time. No time limit for it. This is also a natural justice.Please advice accordingly with citation.
Anonymous
21 May 2011 at 12:30
My case is at the Respondents Evidence stage where i am a Respondent ...
One new Documentary Evidence has emerged lately which was not present earlier by us in the case because it was not there itself and now it is visible because the plaintiff (our opponent) has filed a statement some where and this evidence has emerged now ...
Can we file this documentary evidence whic is most important now at this stage of the case and if so under what Rule of CPC ...
Thanks ...
house property
My nanaji have 04 daughter and 02 brothers. My mother is also 01 sister out of 04. My nanaji has transfered all property (houses) to my mousiji (elder sister) in 1968 by valid registration process. But all other brother and sister are living in this house from 1968 till date (2011). Now my mousiji want to sell that property to other person. My mother has also been paid rent from 1964 to 1968 and that receipt is kept with my mother. but after 1968 no rent is payed to mousiji or nanaji and one one demand the same. can my mother demand her right in this house property in this situation?