mahendrakumar
25 June 2011 at 07:18
a case was remanded back to the cdrf by the state forum on the appeal of the OP stating that the op were not given an opportunity by the cdrf to adduce evidence.
during the first hearing after the remand,the cdrf asked the complainant to submit any new evidence if any on the next hearing.
as per the order of the stateforum'both parties can submit fresh evidence/arguments if any and decide the case afresh.
the complainant want to submit further evidences based on the OP's evidence/stand only.
Now,can the complainant ask/make a submission to the cdrf for permitting to sumit evidences later after the "OP"?
can we make this request orally or in writing next hearing?
Anonymous
24 June 2011 at 18:30
X Having Two Sons, Mr A and Mr B. Mr A got 3 Acres Granted land from the Gov in 1981. Next 1982 year 2 Acr of Granted land was Alienated for Horticulture and Building Houses. The Next 1983 year All the Properties are Partitioned through Court Decree including mr A Granted land.
Kath is separated and In Mutation Registered also they mentioned Partitioned Details
X 10 G Alienated and 10 Revenue
A 1 Acre Alienated and 10 Revenue
B 30 Gut Alienated and 20 Revenue
In A's Kath Still 2 Acer land is displaying with Alienated.
B's Kath 30 G Alienated and 20 Revenue is displaying.
The Next Year 1984, Mr X and mr A has Sold all the Properties and mr B Sold 3 Gut Alienated land and 10 gut revenue land
Now the Mr's A Sons has failed case against Mr B in the court. Because still 2 acr alienated kath is in mr A's name and Mr B also having his Partitioned entries in the Katha 30 G alienated and 20 G revenue
A’s Katha is not transferred to his Wife , they Rejected in thaluk office.
Please Guide what are the steps needs to be taken and in this case what will be the Stand for Mr B.
amir haider
24 June 2011 at 15:26
good day,
i am an officer in an autonomous body(govt organization). when i joined this organization i could not get proper relieving from my previous employer which was also a govt organization ; due to which my service period overlapped by six months. and i also got pay from both organization for one month simultaneously . now i am very worried that if my organization get to know somehow about this i may land into very serious trouble and may even lose job. please advice what course should i take.it may also be noted that this thing happened four years back and i still seriously worried about that please help me.
AMIR HAIDER
Anonymous
24 June 2011 at 14:17
I was signed a mou with an educational institute for franchise and gave him the cheque of Rs 150,000 and after that i m getting the negative report about that company so i was back out and send the e mail to company about cancellation of franchise but they present the cheque it was bounced, and they also send me a legal notice for cheque bouncing @138, My question is that i never used the company brand name or any other activities on the name of company, so which type of case i can logged against company and in both cases which case is more strong.
SUDHA MAKOL
24 June 2011 at 13:39
IN A SUIT FOR POSESSION AND CANCELLATION OF DOCUMENTS OF AN ILLEGAL EXTENDED STRUCTURE, THE DOCUMENTS ON THE BASIS OF WHICH THE CASE WAS FILED INCLUDED REGISTERED GPA (NOIDA), WILL AND RECEIPT (DELHI) ON SAME DATE. THE WIL AND RECEIPT ARE FOUND TO BE FAKE WHILE THE GPA IS ORIGINAL. WHAT CAN BE DONE TO CONTINUE THE CASE? FILE A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE LAST PARTY AND ADMIT THE PAPERS TO BE FORGED? HOW WILL IT AFFECT THE CASE? WILL THE CASE BE DISMISSED? IS THERE A CHANCE THAT THE ORIGINAL PROPERTY STRUCTURE MAY BE GIVEN TO THE OTHER PARTY? CASE DETAILS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Mrs. Raj Rani executed GPA in favour of Mr. Surnder Arora in Noida authority on 19 Jan. 1989 and Regd. receipt and will in favour of Charanjit singh in Delhi authority on same date. However Charanjit singh constructed an unauthorised structure onthe roof of the said property and executed a conditional agreement(Notary) in Jan. 1999 with Sushil Arora that he is mortgaging the extended structure and in case he does not repay he will execute proper property documents in favour of Sushil Arora. A dispute between Charanjit singh and Surnder Arora Arose and Surnder Arora sold 123C to Rakesh Malhotra on Jan. 2000 vide registered papers gpa, agreement to sell, will receipt etc. Rakesh Malhotra sold the property to Lalita Makol on the basis of registered gps, agreement to sell on 30 june 2008. However to complete chain of papers he created forged will and receipt of Raj Rani to Surinder Arora and handed it to Lalita Makol.
Sushil Arora renamed the unauthorised extended portion as 123-D an independent flat rather than extended portion and executed gpa and agreement to sell in favour of rita kumari on 23 march 2009 which was resold to Sudha Sachdeva on the basis of regd. gpa and agreement to sell.
In March 2011 Lalita Makol filed the abovementioned case against Sudha SAchdevA ON THE BASIS OF CHAIN OF DOCUMENTS. SUDHA SACHDEVA REPLIED THAT WILL AND RECEIPT IN FAVOUR OF SURINDER ARORA ARE FRAUD.
Lalita Makol Needs an advise. Shall she admit the fraud papers? what effect will it have on the case? Shall she file a complaint agaist the last party? What are the possible outcomes and remedies available with Lalita Makol? Its REALLY URGENT........THANKS.
Harsh
24 June 2011 at 10:53
As per our below mentioned query, if we go for RD, than can it be suffient to get RD from only on heir (i.e unmarried daughter who is right now with Ms.A)OR we required RD from all heirs?
If we give only one heir's RD, THAN CAN REGISTRAR MAY ASK FOR FUTHER RDs from OTHER HEIRS?
-------------------------------------------
Ms. A wanted to sell the house of Mr. B which the B has given to Ms. A (Sister) through unregistered will. Mr. B has died earlier (Brother of Ms. A having two daughters one married and one is unmarried). Now she wanted to sell the house mentioned in the will. One of the buyer said Ms. A that they required Relinquishment deed (RD) from unmarried daughter of Mr B (Brother). But my query is that Ms. A is competent enough to sell the house through unregistered will, so it is necessary to give RD to the buyer? Kindly gives us detail possibilities in the regard. Thanks
Anonymous
24 June 2011 at 10:44
dear sir,
during an internal inquiry i had submitted a set of photostat documents containing official warnings to a junior(say accused) citing them as the reason for his levelling unsubstantiated allegations of irregularities committed by me. during the inquiry the letters were denied to have been received by him and he claimed that his signatures on these warning letters were forged. the inquiry chose to believe him and sent the documents to govt forensic lab for opinion. the same report was not shown to me. parallely, i also forwarded these disputed documents to a well established forensic examiner alongwith the speciment signatures of the accused of the period relevant to the date of the disputed documents. this examiner has ruled the signatures to be of the accused person and has given a detailed scientific explanation for his findings. my question is
1. can the internal inquiry which is fact finding qua si judicial body summarily disregard report obtained by me.
2. can the inquiry deny me the report/opinion of the govt forensic lab even when asked for during the inquiry so as to enable me cross examine its findings if adverse for me.
3. can they give their findings on the disputed document without cross examining the forensic expert contacted by me even when strongly requested by me to establish the truth.
kindly guide me on the settled law position on the above query.thanks
mahesan
24 June 2011 at 08:57
A, B & c jointly purchased the properties. A was met accident at last year now he was now at goma & unconsious stage. B and C will ready to sale their undivided shares in the above properties to some other parties. But family members and legal heirs of A is ready to sale the Share of A to the same parties. How can Legal heirs of A is Sale the properties to others. What relief A and his family members to sold the above 1/3 shares?
seema
23 June 2011 at 21:50
Hi All,
Plz can anyone help me how should i draft the written statement to be filed on behalf of the owner driver before the MOtor Accident Claims Tribunal in an accident case? Can anyone plz share the drafted WS here ? Thanks.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
getting salary from two employers
greetings
1) can anyone guide me why getting salary from two GOVT Departments (employers) simultaneously is not permissible?
2)WHICH CIVIL LAWS/RULES PROHIBITS ABOVE?
3) Why 'RELIEVING LETTER' must be taken from previous employer? is there any civil rule about relieving letter or otherwise?
please give specific answers.
Regards