Anonymous
06 July 2011 at 21:13
I Am/worked as Clinical Assistant in leading medical Institute of India since 1997 purely on adhoc basis and participated in selection process against the Unreserved Post (UR) held in year 2002 and was placed in waiting list panel by the selection committee. Subsequently one vacancy was created due to the resignation of one candidate but I was denied appointment against the post. Moreover, I didn't know about my candidature as the result wasnot even notified. I came to know about the status of candidature by the way of RTI
The Institute/organisation had advertised one post of clinical Assistant in year 2006 under Reserved Category (SC) in which one candidate was given appointment against the post and other candidate was placed in the waiting list panel. Subsequently after one year , another post under Unreserved Category was created due to termination of the one candidate. The Institute had offered the vacancy to the other candidate who was placed in the waiting list panel against the reserved category (SC) prepared by the selection committee.
I smell fishy about his/her genuiness of being entry in very suspicious manner. Because in my case the vacncy was created within 4 months and I was denied appointment and in his/her case post was offered in a very surprised manner. RTI was filed in this reagrd for offering the Unreserved Post (UR) to other candidate who was placed as waitlisted candidate under Reserved Category (SC) without advertisement and without giving any opportunities to the candidates of UR. The Institute replies that since the panel was valid there was no need of advertisement
I filed a case before non consideration of the candidature against the Unreserved Post in year 2002 . The CAT allowed my Application and give directions to the Respondent Institute to appoint me on regular basis. The Institute showed helpless in offering me the seat as they stated that all posts have been filled up and move to the High Court. The High court has reverted it back for deciding the plea of Limitation which was dismissed by CAT. I am now planning to file writ petition against the order
Since, organisation has made irregularities in offering the post of Unreserved category (UR) to the candidate who was placed in the waiting List against the Reserved Category (SC) without advertisement and without given any opprtunity to the other candidates of UR.
Whether writ petition can be filed against the Institute for giving undue favors to the candidate without comparing relative merits. As I could not made him the party because I have participated in the selection Process in year 2002 and the candidate was appointed IN YEAR 2007 against the Unreserved post (UR) without given opportunity to other candidates
Whether its necessary to made the appointed candidate as party. or urged the court to conduct an enquiry by the way of writ petition as the organization has reply ready that since panel was valid and there is no need for advertisement?
Whether urging Court to conduct an enquiry for appointment will solve the riddle, if Institute nor the appointed member will be the party of the case??
tanvi
06 July 2011 at 18:56
hi i want to know that i want to do complaint against the secretary of my building.as he is doing bias & with the help of majority of members, issues any irrelevant rules & behaves like he is the owner of the building.so pl. tell me to whom i shall make complaint
thanks.
Harsh
06 July 2011 at 18:09
IS THERE ANY CASE LAWS WHERE THE POWER OF ATTORNEY WAS NOT PROPERLY SIGNED STILL THE CASE IS NOT DISSMISSED. PLEASE GIVE CITATIONS.
THANKS
Harsh
06 July 2011 at 18:06
CAN SUIT BE DISSMISSED ONLY ON THE GROUND THAT THE POWER OF ATTORNY IS NOT PROPERLY SIGNED UNDER ORDER III OF CPC?
Anonymous
06 July 2011 at 17:10
HARYANA & PANJAB high court dismissed a case of claim over the property acquired by the haryana govt in the outskirts of gurgaon and the case was finally disposed on 1 jan 2011 after approx 19 years now the compensation given to the claimants is according to older rates as in 1992 . does claimants have any right to move to SC and protect prorepty from acquisition by govt or to claim more compensation by the govt
Anonymous
06 July 2011 at 16:07
sir,
can you please help me by answering the consequences of delay in filing injunction application under order 39.
it could be of great helpfulness if could cite some relevent supreme court cases.
Anonymous
06 July 2011 at 13:11
Dear Experts,
When we are file the suit for partition that time we unfortunately forgat one of the portion in the total property measuring 0.20 guntas, Now my clarification is any possiblity is their for add this portion to partition suit, I already ask my lawyer he says no, why?If it is possible tell me the procedure.(The suit is their from five years.)
Thank U sir,
Kavitha
anantha madhav
06 July 2011 at 12:15
Dear Members,
"Legal Practitioners may be permitted to appear as amicus curiae only and not as a PAID vakil with vakalatnama"
I am party in person in family court for my divorce suit and maintenance suit
I reqeusted the same in family court, the opposit lawyer contested that there is no such order and asked me to bring the copy if, so.
Let me know where can i get the copy or please refer any citation or section under family court or such orders......please
valentine thakkar
06 July 2011 at 11:33
Please provide legal definition of the phrase "self-inflicted injury" with citations, if possible.
Anonymous
06 July 2011 at 09:59
My question is that is the marriage law amendment bill, 2010 , passes by the Gazette of India? has any notification been given by the Gazette?
Whether its necessary to made the appointed candidate as party for ordering an inquiry?
I Am/worked as Clinical Assistant in leading medical Institute of India since 1997 purely on adhoc basis and participated in selection process against the Unreserved Post (UR) held in year 2002 and was placed in waiting list panel by the selection committee. Subsequently one vacancy was created due to the resignation of one candidate but I was denied appointment against the post. Moreover, I didn't know about my candidature as the result wasnot even notified. I came to know about the status of candidature by the way of RTI
The Institute/organisation had advertised one post of clinical Assistant in year 2006 under Reserved Category (SC) in which one candidate was given appointment against the post and other candidate was placed in the waiting list panel. Subsequently after one year , another post under Unreserved Category was created due to termination of the one candidate. The Institute had offered the vacancy to the other candidate who was placed in the waiting list panel against the reserved category (SC) prepared by the selection committee.
I smell fishy about his/her genuiness of being entry in very suspicious manner. Because in my case the vacncy was created within 4 months and I was denied appointment and in his/her case post was offered in a very surprised manner. RTI was filed in this reagrd for offering the Unreserved Post (UR) to other candidate who was placed as waitlisted candidate under Reserved Category (SC) without advertisement and without giving any opportunities to the candidates of UR. The Institute replies that since the panel was valid there was no need of advertisement
I filed a case before non consideration of the candidature against the Unreserved Post in year 2002 . The CAT allowed my Application and give directions to the Respondent Institute to appoint me on regular basis. The Institute showed helpless in offering me the seat as they stated that all posts have been filled up and move to the High Court. The High court has reverted it back for deciding the plea of Limitation which was dismissed by CAT. I am now planning to file writ petition against the order
Since, organisation has made irregularities in offering the post of Unreserved category (UR) to the candidate who was placed in the waiting List against the Reserved Category (SC) without advertisement and without given any opprtunity to the other candidates of UR.
Whether writ petition can be filed against the Institute for giving undue favors to the candidate without comparing relative merits. As I could not made him the party because I have participated in the selection Process in year 2002 and the candidate was appointed IN YEAR 2007 against the Unreserved post (UR) without given opportunity to other candidates
Whether its necessary to made the appointed candidate as party. or urged the court to conduct an enquiry by the way of writ petition as the organization has reply ready that since panel was valid and there is no need for advertisement?
Whether urging Court to conduct an enquiry for appointment will solve the riddle, if Institute nor the appointed member will be the party of the case??