MSC Shekar
12 October 2011 at 12:35
Is there a limitation / time limit for a Information Commission to act on False information Complaint proved beyond reasonable doubt ?
Can the complainant give a ultimatum to the Information Commissioner to act within a time frame thereafter take up the matter with the Hon'ble High Court?
This query arises as Information Commissioners have been going soft on Government Staff who give false / misleading info.
Thanks in Advance
MSC Shekar
12 October 2011 at 12:27
I need information on the following:
1)Where can we get the information/ Records on Guardianship or appointed guardians.
2) In which court it will be available.
3) Can Guardianship records be requested under RTI Act?
Thanks in Advance.
Anonymous
12 October 2011 at 10:58
The facts are as under:—
1. I the landlord filed an eviction petition against my tenant on grounds as under.
(a) Material impairment
(b) "13(3)(a)(iv) the tenant has already in his own possession a residential building or subsequently acquires possession of, or erects, such a building reasonably sufficient for his requirement in the urban area concerned;"
2. The tenant filed an application under 1/10 for impleading the other co owners. Althout the rent note was between him and me only.
3. The said application was turned down.
4. The Lower court / Rent controller ordered eviction of the tenant and allowed 3 months to give vacant possession.
5. The tenant filed an appeal in sessions against the said order.
6. The tenant's stay aplication was not decided. The tenant filed another application in the sessions to appoint local commissioner and report that the encroachment done by him is not alone whole of the market near his area has encroached upon.
7. Part arguments were held in sessions and the case was adjourned for order. One day prior to order the judge got transfered orders and the judge adjourned the case without any orders on stay application.
8. Then the case was transfered and the court became defunct.
9. The case was received by transfer in the new court.
10. The counsel for tenant kept on taking adjournment after adjournment one pretext or the other without getting the stay application decided.
11. We filed execution on the lower court's orderas there was not stay from sessions for 9 months. The execution was allowed and a warrant of possession was issued.
12. Executing that warrant of possesion we got the vacant possession of the said shop.
Question 1. What is the legal postion of this appleal in sessions now ?
Question 2. What legal remidies are available to the tenant ?
Question 3. The tenant had also filed and interpleader suit, now what will be situation in this case ?
Smart Developer
12 October 2011 at 10:32
My car had met with an accident and now the case is in the court, i had filed the FIR against the person who was responsible for it. The person is from press and influential
Now my question do I have to hire a lawyer to argue for my case or would I get a public prosecutor?
Also how long will it take to resolve?
I have only 1 person as witness, will that do?
Also the other party has said, the accident was not done by her, How do i prove she had done it?
Do I have to produce false witness, which I dont want?
Anonymous
12 October 2011 at 10:08
dear sir,
i am the beneficiary and executor of the will of my mother , which has been probated by the delhi high court.
my younger brother who is a beneficiary of the first floor of a house at delhi has encroached on the unconstructed second floor willed to me and has constructed rooms and running an illegal guest house.
i have filed a suit for possession with delhi high court. the delhi high court has decreed in aug 2011 that the defendant, younger brother shall pay me market rent for use of second floor if the suit is decreed in my favour.
HOWEVER WHILE GETTING ALL ADVANTAGES UNDER THE WILL THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN WRITING OBNOXIOUS LETTERS AGAINST ME FULL OF LIES TO ALL RELATIVE STATING THAT I HAVE STOLEN ORNAMENTS, THAT I AM LOSING THE CASE AND WRITING TO SISTERS THAT THEY SHOULD ASK FOR ACS FROM ME ETC AND MORE SUCH LETTERS IN POOREST TASTE.
I HAVE FILED TEN SUCH LETTERS IN HIS OWN HANDWRITING WITH THE COURT.
WHAT IS THE ATTUTIDE OF THE COURT TOWARDS SUCH ACTIONS SINCE I HAVE INFORMED THE COURT THAT DEF HAS MADE ALL ATTEMPTS TO MALIGN ME.
MY QUERIES.
1. CAN COURT IMPOSE PENALTY ON DEF FOR HIS ACTIONS.
2. THE WILL EMPOWERS ME TO TAKE ANY DECISION IN REGARD TO THE HOUSE. I NOW LEARN THAT UNDER NEW LAWS THE FOURTH FLOOR IS ALSO ALLOWED BY MCD.
3. IF THE COURT ALLOWS ME TO TAKE A DECUSION ON THE FOURTH FLOOR SINCE THE WILL SAYS THAT ALL ACTIONS SHALL BE FINAL BY THE EXECUTOR ON AC OF THE HOUSE, CAN I NOT GIVE HIM THE SHARE OF THE FOURTH FLOOR AND GIVE IT TO ENDER BROTHER WITHOUT TAKING ANY SHARE MYSELF?
REGARS
VINAY KALA OCT 12
Anonymous
11 October 2011 at 22:30
Is there any equivalent provisions in Indian Trusts Act, as section 41[d]of Bombay public Trusts Act.
Anonymous
11 October 2011 at 19:35
My father and his brother being the only legal heirs got a will probated among themselves in which it stated that the Letter of Administration will be issued subject to deposit of court fees and a surety.
As my father and my uncle were not in talking terms they did not pay the court fees and produced a surety and neither went to registrar to get the Titles of the properties marked in their names. Now my uncle has sold his undivided share in one of the properties of the Will without doing the above mentioned formalities.As per my knowledge the title should not be transferred to their name till court fees is not paid
1.Will this sale be legal.
2.Can i challenge the sale and get the property reverted back to us by paying the seller the consideration value on the sale deed.
3.Can my uncle sell his rights in the undivided share before the said formalities.
4. Can my uncle give a power of attorney regarding the above said undivided rights in the property and also the possession of the said property.
gaurav
11 October 2011 at 19:27
sir,
i m working with central govt.i have raised some loans amounting 2000000 from various cooperative societies and could nt repaid back and now asst.collector sent execution under cooperative rules to my office to not to release my retirement benefits unless n.o.c.is issued..now societies are demanding around 9lakh.inclusive of interest. my office has intimated me to clear the dues and produce noc otherwise they are not going to process my retirement case.m in need of help. m vng daughter whose marriage is about to due.out of my retirement benefits what they can deduct or can my office legally refused to process my case of retirement? what legal remedy i have so that my benefits are processed and released to me.can u suggest me some expert lawyers who deal in c.a.t.and cooperative societies.at new delhior tishazari.
hemantha
11 October 2011 at 18:21
My dv case oral arugements completed initally he asked the fees 25,000/- by the time oral arugment started he recieved the fees almost 35,000/- and bymail me if you pay another 30,000/- only i will argue somehow through loans i paid him another 22500/- oral argument completed without citations now asking him to file the written arguements and citations he is not ready and not coming to the court the Most important thing i only prepared the written arguemtns and citattions with help of internet websites and the written arguement he studied and told very good also but not ready to file to the court at this stage can i file myself written arguemnts and citations directly to the court without noc or i have ask noc from him if he is not willing to give what i should do?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Lok adalat power deciding bonafide of title if both parties agreed
sir,if purchaser demanded to give token advance amount back because vendor did not have valid Title as per agreement and same is refused by vendor stating that he has valid marketable title and both are agreed to settle advance token amount after conclusion of bonafide title of that property in out side the court but in strong juridiction which is very fast and less expensive and take less time for delivery of judgment i.e in Lok adalat.In this case PLZ clarify
1)whether Lok adalat has juridiction power to make proceedings on said property and make conclusions on bonafied Title of property whether it is marketable or not on basis of evidence as if both parties agreed the same for proceedings and make written statement that they obey conclusions of Lok adalat about bonafied of title and also stated that with that conclusion ,we both are ready to settle token advance amount on conditions stating full amount return to purcaser if conclusion of Lokadalat is vendor has no marketable title and no refund of money to purchaser if conclusion is vendor has valid marketable title