Anonymous
16 October 2011 at 10:01
My mobile was insured and it was stolen.
I filed a complaint with the police station, stating that the mobile is stolen. While giving the petition receipt, the police had mentioned it as "missing".
The insurance company rejecting the claim, stating that the police had mentioned in the receipt as "missing". Even though the complaint was acknowledged by the police by affixing seal and sign, the insurance company is not accepting it.
My statement is that the insurance company ought to see the complaint only.
What can be the solution?
Sir, Recently I have seen the below mentioned article regarding a woman is entitled to get equal share in the properties. I want to know the details of the judgment before the SC, its number or detailed judgment copy. with regards.
Hindu woman entitled to equal property rights: SC
October 05, 2011
The Supreme Court ruled that the female inheritors would have succession rights and the same liabilities fastened on the property along with the male members.
A Hindu woman or girl will have equal property rights along with other male relatives for any partition made in intestate succession after September 2005, the Supreme Court has ruled.
A bench of justices R. M. Lodha and Jagdish Singh Khehar in a judgment said that under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the daughters are entitled to equal inheritance rights along with other male siblings, which was not available to them prior to the amendment.
The apex court said the female inheritors would not only have the succession rights but also the same liabilities fastened on the property along with the male members.
“The new Section 6 provides for parity of rights in the coparcenary property among male and female members of a joint Hindu family on and from 9 September 2005. The legislature has now conferred substantive right in favor of the daughters.
“According to the new Section 6, the daughter of a coparcener becomes a coparcener by birth in her own rights and liabilities in the same manner as the son. The declaration in Section 6 that the daughter of the coparcener shall have same rights and liabilities in the coparcenary property as she would have been a son is unambiguous and unequivocal,” Justice Lodha, writing the judgment, said.
The term coparcener refers to the equal inheritance right of a person in a property.
The apex court passed the ruling while upholding the appeal filed by Ganduri Koteshwaramma, daughter of late Chakiri Venkata Swamy, challenging the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision not to recognize equal property rights of women along with their male siblings.
can a citi bank recover agent allowed to pick up things from the house or the bike without the order of the court i had used only 7000/- and they are telling me to pay 32000/- why should i pay i was ready to pay 10000/- but they are no agreeing at all.....
i have used 7000/- from my credit card citibank and after 7month i get a letter to pay 32000/-they sent some recovery people to my house,those people threatened my wife that they will pick up all the things from my house can they do so,i spoke to the customer care and told them that i used 7000/- so i am ready to pay 10000/- they told me to pay 22000/-i told them that they didnt inform me about the reminder of the payment this is not my problem i cannot pay the said amount 22000/-now they sent me an email that they will take any legal action,are they allowed to touch any thing from the house,can they pick up the 2wheeler are they alloyed to raise their hand......
please guide me and help me what can i do
After withdrwal of a Civil Suit by the Plaintiff himself, whether Injunction Order, which earlier passed in the such Suit, can be called as Subjudice or still affective?
Naga Harsha
15 October 2011 at 17:37
If a legal matter has been brought up for arbitration and arbitration has been dismissed, on legal grounds and no new arbitrator has been proposed/appointed and no party has approached any court can the matter be said to be "Sub Judice"?
I would be grateful if you can provide any info such as past ruling or specific law pertaining to this along with the answer.
Praveen Singh
15 October 2011 at 15:57
Any case law against closure of national highway by polluted-sewage water or suggestion of any remedy
Anonymous
15 October 2011 at 14:30
shares are wrongly transferred to one of clients demat account , now he refused to transfer those share back. what is legal provision in this regard?
Time of India has published the following news.. any one having the case number and date of judgement/ detail judgement.. pls share
General power of attorney has no legal sanctity: SC
The Supreme Court today ruled that sale transactions carried in the name of general power of attorney will have no legal sanctity and immovable property can be sold or transferred only through registered deeds.
A three-judge bench of justices R V Raveendran, A K Patnaik and H L Gokhale also asked the states to reduce stamp duty rates to prevent undervaluation of property and stashing of black money by vested interests.
The apex court said high stamp rates has led to rampant abuse of the general powr of attorney (GPA), sale agreements (SA) and Wills, resulting in huge loss of money to the exchequer.
“Transactions of the nature of `GPA sales¿ or `SA/GPA/WILL transfers' do not convey title and do not amount to transfer nor can they be recognised or valid mode of transfer of immovable property.
“The courts will not treat such transactions as completed or concluded transfers or as conveyances as they neither convey title nor create any interest in an immovable property.
“Such transactions cannot be relied upon or made the basis for mutations in municipal or revenue records,” Justice Raveendran, writing the judgement, said.
The apex court said the amendments to stamp and registration laws by various states do not address the larger issue of generation of black money and operation of land mafia and hence there was a need to reduce the stamp duty though it may result in loss or revenue.
“When high stamp duty is prevalent, there is a tendency to undervalue documents even where sale deeds are executed
Laptop booking & cancellation
I have booked a laptop with a reputed company. I have paid 100 money in advance. They promised to deliver within 24 hours at home and had mentioned it in the receipt also.
But, even after 48 hours they have not delivered the laptop. They are also not returning the money. They need some more time for delivery.
In the mean time I found their cost is 2000 more than the another seller.
I need my money enabling me to buy it with the cheap price.
Can I demand for compensation for delay in delivery and refund?