Anonymous
16 October 2011 at 20:49
pls tell me diference between these two with any case law.
Anonymous
16 October 2011 at 20:46
whether dismissal in default amount to decree.where will appeal go if it is decree.
Anonymous
16 October 2011 at 20:43
order 20 cpc rule11
(11) . Decree may direct payment by instalments— (1) Where and in so far as a decree is for the payment of money, the Court may for any sufficient reason [230][incorporate in the decree after hearing such of the parties who had appeared personally or by pleader at the last hearing, before judgment, an order that] payment of the amount decreed shall be postponed or shall be made by installments, with or without interest, notwithstanding anything contained in the contract under which the money is payable.
(2) Order, after decree, for payment by instalments—After the passing of any such decree the Court may, on the application of the judgment-debtor and with the consent of the decree-holder, order that payment of the amount decreed shall be postponed or shall be made by instalments on such terms as to the payment of interest, the attachment of the property of the judgment-debtor, or the taking of security from him, or otherwise, as it thinks fit.
consent of decree holder how far is required as to mode of settlement of payment?.court is empowered to pass decree without consent of decree holder?
Anonymous
16 October 2011 at 16:42
Can a person who has availed free legal aid from District Legal Service Authority including advocate for filling case under PWDV Act -2005 simultaneosly avail services of Private Lawyer in the same case filed thru Legal Aid Lawyer.
If no ,then what could be the legal course for the person gainst whom the case has been filed with the help of legal Aid.
Is there any citation that a person who has been availing free legal aid including free counsel can not avail the services of private counsel in the same litigation.
Bharti Joshi
16 October 2011 at 16:01
Hello sir/madam
I want to be guidence about this matter which file is attach. please reply me . THAK YOU.
jeetendra patel
16 October 2011 at 13:08
DEAR COLLEAGUE, I HAVE FILED A SUIT FOR RECOVERY AGAINST A COMPANY.EX PARTE ORDER CAME TO BE PASSED.I HAVE FOLLOWING QUERY.
I CLAIMED 18% P.A. RATE OF INTEREST FROM DATE OF DEMAND.i.e. ALMOST PRIOR TO 3 YEARS OF FILING OF SUIT TILL ACTUAL REALISATION.THERE IS NO WRITTEN AGREEMENT REGARDING RATE OF INTEREST.COURT HAS POWER/DISCRETION TO GRANT THE SAME AS PER SECTION 34 C.P.C.ANY CITATION IN CASE OF EXPARTE WHERE ALL CONTENTION GONE UNCHALLENGED TO GRANT SAID INTEREST FROM DEMAND TILL ACTUAL REALISATION WHERE I AM CLAIMING THE SAID INTEREST AND ALSO CONTENDING AS PER USUAL TRADE AND CUSTOM.
Sundaram Kumar
16 October 2011 at 12:43
Can any person be as a President or Secretary when he is not not owned a Flat but his wife. If he wants to hold any position what sort of document he suppose to have.
Sundaram Kumar
Anonymous
16 October 2011 at 12:17
Hi i am maternal uncle of minors who has has been legally nominated guardian for two minors based on minors intelligent preference and seeing child welfare (aged 13 yrs girl and 8 yrs boy)Against their paternal grandmother by district court.
While guardian of property is appointed as grandmother.
While Paternal grandmother can visit on any holiday to minors. Also in summer vacation and Diwali vacation she can take minor with her for week long period. But children can not live without single minute and if order will like such they can take minors forcefully that will affect minors in all aspects .What can be done?
Anonymous
16 October 2011 at 10:28
I have filed suit for declaration of civil death in civil court. in the said suit i have made the deceased person and the state a parties to the suit. the court asked me question that deceased person is a party is ok but why state is a necessary party to the said suit?? and in such type of suits notice u/s 80 is madatory??
just explanation needed???
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Summoning of defendant
In a suit the defendant is disputing the existence of a will. Can he be summoned as a witness to prove his signature in the will if the case of the plaintiff is that he is the attestor to the will. Can Interrogatory be served on him?