Anonymous
30 November 2011 at 20:19
Hello Esteemed Experts,
Could you help me understanding how proceeding is carried out for a MACT case.
Currently I have a MACT case pending in which I am respondent and as per the latest status Written statement has been filed by both the respondents(i.e me and the insurance company). Court have asked the petitioner to file evidences via affidavit.
What is the next step court will follow and how long it will take(in terms of number of hearing approx) to conclude the case.
Will there be any need for respondent to appear before the court in that duration? And if so how many times court will ask respondent to appear before the court?
When a group of persons attempted to grab our house with the help of some fake documents, I approached the High Court of Chennai which in turn directed the District Crime Branch Police to enquire and submit its report and this happened in December 2009. The District Crime Police also after preliminary investigation found truth in the complaint made by me and arrested the power agent and one of the buyers who made a fraudulent purchase of our house in January 2010. However, the police did not make any attempt to apprehend the main accused and he is roaming free. The main accused got Anticipatory Bail which I got it cancelled. Also, the main accused has filed a petition in the High Court seeking the FIR to be quashed telling that the charges were fabricated. Though the suit was filed by the accused against the Police, I impleaded myself as another respondent opposing the quash request by the accused. The suit is pending in the High Court for more than one and half years and not even taken up for hearing after initial two or three hearings which were also adjourned for some reasons or other. The police too from January 2010 to till date, did not make any attempt to apprehend the accused. My repeated verbal requests and written letters sent through the Speed Post to the District Crime Branch to arrest the main accused and/or file the Charge Sheet did not attended by the police. The Police is also not taking any action and the Court is also not taking any action and the advocate whom I engaged is also not taking any action. Now I kindly request the learned lawyers of this form to guide me further action to be taken in this matter.
Anonymous
30 November 2011 at 18:45
Hello.
When a person posts some information on the internet which is a complete lie and i want to file a case against him how do i proceed?
My major question is the movement i send them a legal notice they can simply change the content and claim that i am lying, So how can i get a copy of the content which can be submitted in a court, which they cannot claim to have been edited my me.
Anonymous
30 November 2011 at 17:45
Hi,
Me and my husband are joint owner of our property/bank account. Now he is no more and I can easily transfer the property/account to my name by producing the death certificate.
Upon the death of one joint tenant, his/her interest
immediately passes to the surviving joint tenant. you can get it in details in http://legalserviceindia.com/articles/plaw.htm.
I got many article on this law. As per the same, when survivor is there, even the legal hier doesnt get right to that property.
Can you please let me know if there is any risk for me to face any problem in future as his mother is still alive?
deepak
30 November 2011 at 16:23
Judgement date 20/2/2010 Suit stand decree with cost ,defendent are hereby restrained by order of injunction from working & conducting saloon business in the suit shop. first appeal in highcourt is pending for stay on decree.Defendent pray: appeal the appellant be allowed to pay to the Respondent or deposit in court themouthly compensation of Rs5000/-.First ad-interim order granted on 26/4/2010 the applicate has to pay the amount of arrear withinthe stipulated period of Rs5000/- per mouth. SecOND AD-INTERIM ORDER DATED 14/6/2010 IS CONTINUED FOR PERIOD OF TWO WEEK ON APPLICATE PAYING SUM OF RS5000/- PER. WEEK TILL THEN.ORDER FOR STAY IS PENDING.APPLICATE CONTINUE DOING SALOON BUSINESS STILL TODAY. I have file for exitcution notice under 32(1).I want to know weather can i filed acontempt application for violating the order of injunction passed against defendent if appeal is pending in highcourt.3)application not paying any compensation nor deposit in the court after second ad-interim order. what to do? pleace adivce.
Anonymous
30 November 2011 at 16:21
my loan was sanctioned for 21 lakh for a flat booking and builder had received abt 9 lakh as 2 installement. after that we known that the stay order was there to no construction in that land as one company has registered a case against builder for owenership of that land.
but the loan was sanctioned without investigation of that matter and now we are paying EMI? please suggest what to do to get my money back from the builder or to avoid the EMI which i am paying for nothing in my hand(flat).
Anonymous
30 November 2011 at 15:13
here the problem is:
Firm X is a registered proprietor firm and is a manufacturing firm..
Now Company Y buy some goods from firm X and after some period says that material is not of standard quality and not agreed to pay the cost of Goods Buyed..
Now the problem in above facts...is...
Firm X want to file a case in court regarding the cost of Goods Sold by Power of Attorney Holder..
1. Is it possible to file a suit in court to represent firm by power of attorney holder and The Proprietor can waive himself to appear from court...
2. The power of attorney holder is person like manager in firm....who is well known of facts regarding material/goods sold.
I have heard from some advocates that power of attorney holder cannot represent case or file suit on behalf of proprietor firm to recover the cost of goods sold?
Is it true???
Sohit
30 November 2011 at 12:32
I have filed a suit for eviction and possesion against the tenant(original defendant), but after filing the written statement the defendant died. I under Order22 Rule 4 brought the legal heirs of defendant on record, who have filed their fresh written statement and denied all the contentions of plaint which were admitted by the original defendant. So whether the court can rely upon the written statement of original defendant and is there any provision in CPC where the LR's of defendant cannot file fresh Written Statement when once it is filed by the original defendant. Please quote some Citations
Anonymous
30 November 2011 at 00:12
please provide citation asap
thanks
Cpc 7 rule 10
in one civil suit, when matter is ready for hearing of stay application, on that time the respondent give application for barred of pecunary jurisdiction of court, now the jmfc court ask for return the plaint, if the returning the plaint then which document include like our document list which we produce with the main petition.? and if the court return the plaint in another new court from which stage start a new procedure. in new court the stage is same? like hearing on stay application or new stage?