Anonymous
19 December 2011 at 08:05
Dear Experts,
After hearing both sides (also numbered as Civil Appeal) Judgment and Decree of the High Court was confirmed by the Supreme court and dismiss the appeal.
Does the appeal dismissal Judgment will carry a decree with it?
OR
Will the Supreme court draw a Decree for all the Civil Appeal Judgment, whether it was Allowed or Dismissed?
Thanking in advance
Anonymous
18 December 2011 at 23:18
Dear Sir/Madam,
Basically i am from Bihar and by profession i am Manager Telcom Engineer. My Father was Central government employee and now he has dead. We have ancestral property in Saharsa, Bihar. we are leaving from 1965 After new map configured the pla\ots are rearrange on this position.so the other person near by my plot has rezite the plots are OK but the old map of my plot is ok. So that is the mad person he doesnot talking of right way. so we title of this plot , and running more than 10 yrs.after title is dissmiss. Again we try to challaenging title for decision and other party is construction contineu by forcly.
Please suggest me what should what is action for my side.we are two brothers both are leaving out of station.
Arvind Singh Chauhan
18 December 2011 at 21:23
Sir,
"A" who was ex service man of Asam Rifles, married to "B". Then after some years he married with "c".
In 1996 "B" filed an application under 125 Cr.P.C. in which court gave the finding that When "B" married to "A", "B"'s husband was alive that's why hes marriage with "A" was illegal and her application was rejected.
"A" had mentioned "B" as his wife in service record, and dead now. Now the family pension is being paid to "B" and she is employed in govt. service also.
"C" who has 4 children requested to Asam rifle to stop paying the family pension to "B" and to remove her name from "A"'s service record and provided copy of judgment of 125 Cr.P.C.
Now "C" has filed civil suit to declare her legal wife of "A" and to order Asam Rifle to pay family pension to her and to include her name as wife of "A" in place of "B".
Bank is paying family pension regularly to "B".
Whether "C" can file an application before court to stop payment from Bank or Asam Rifles, of family pension up to the decision of civil suit. If Yes in which provision.
Plz Sir refer law and supporting rulings if any.
M. Jayalakshmi
18 December 2011 at 21:09
This the statement given by the president of our flat owners welfare association before the police in a criminal case."Our, association is no way concerned with the consumer court case and it is their individual. Our builder has sent a bank draft for Rs. 15,000/- in the name of association, towards travel and allied expenses of consumer court case. But we refused the same, but ex secretary conducted urgent meeting with concerned consumer court case members and asked to receive the cheque. According to their request and as per the court directions, we
received the cheque and deposited the same on our association account and same was informed to the authorised person appearing before the commission and other
members. Since, then the amount is in the account of our association."
Due to his other type of statement earlier, the builder has filed criminal complaint against authorised person. He was forced to go for bail and obtained. Informed the National Commission amount has not been given to him by letter. Basing on above statement can the authorised person write to the president to release amount immediately. Please advice.
mahendrakumar
18 December 2011 at 18:58
it is heard that govt has proposed some changes and new bill is being introduced.
does anyone knows regarding the details of amendment?
Has the bill already passed?
what are the chan ges and effective dates?
Anonymous
18 December 2011 at 18:44
The Power of Attorney in the Homeloan agreement is notarized by the bank in my absence. Is this an offence? If yes under which section of the NOTARY ACT does this come? What is that section of the NOTARY ACT defined as? What action can be taken against the bank?What is the maximum capital punishment/penalty for such offence under NOTARY ACT ?
Anonymous
18 December 2011 at 15:43
Dear Experts !
My father enretred in to a compromise deal in a land case in HIGH court in the year 1999 ( Recently the property came to me through his WILL,on perusal i found he was misgudied by his adviser/ Gpa. As per my thinking or Adocate, whom i have consulted; the case is strong one to fight,would not have compromised with the litigant). Can i do any thing to reopen the case, for fresh fight. The above property ( LAND)is still not divide as per compromise, and is intact because of some other reasons.
Please kindly GUIDE me with your advice.
Thanking you ALL in advance.
sudhirghabasu
18 December 2011 at 14:20
hello sirs, good wishes. I had filed a suit for injunction i.e. not to disturb the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit scheduled property. while the pending suit the defendant had disconnected the electricity and sewage connection to the suit schedule property. we had lodged a complaint before the police and connection was restored.subsequently we had filed a petition to amend the plaint:- to add a prayer as no to disconnect the electricity and sewage connection till the disposal of the suit. the defendants had taken a stand that i should file a separate suit. Note: 1) the plaintiffs are in the suit schedule premises. 2) the electricity connection stands in the name of the plaintiff's grandfather. under these circumstances i want a citation to amend the plaint. which will apply to my case. Hope you will help me in this regard.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Land partition - kindly advice,
Dear Experts, Kindly Advice..
Mrs. 'X' had 7 childrens namely A,B,C,D,E,F,G. She had 27 cents of land in her name at the time of her Death. In RTC, 3 names are included (X & 2 childers), those are 'X', 'A' & 'B',
'A' & 'B' both have expired and have 3 & 6 childrens each. Now Childrens of 'A' & 'B' want their 33% share each as mentioned in the RTC ( divided in to 3 names) Also 1/7 th share which belongs to 'X' at the time of her death.
But for this settlement other Childrens of Mrs.'X' who are namely C,D,E,F & G,are not accepting. They demand for Full share of 27 cents land to be divided equally among 7 childrens, for which Childrens of A&B not accepting.
Kindly advise how this matter need to be settled & what does the LAW says. Does it require to to shared equally among all the childrens of X, or only the 33% of X, need to be shared between 7 childrens of X.