KETAN V VARAIYA
02 January 2012 at 12:46
the client has not paid any fees since last eight years
Anonymous
02 January 2012 at 12:15
Respected experts,
There is a clause in an Agreement (un-registered) for the appointment of an Arbitrator, in case of any dispute between the employer and employee in respect of claiming liquidated damages. So what is the period of limitation, if I want to file a case before an Arbitrator, as against the above said Agreement? It should be either from the date of Agreement or from the date of left the organization or from the date of last demand of legal notice.
Anonymous
02 January 2012 at 11:03
I was born in Chennai. I just need "Non Availability of Birth Certificate" from Chennai Corporation since my birth was not registered.
I was born at my uncle's house. My parents don't have any documents at that address for address proof.
I am looking for a lawyer who can help me on this.
Please provide me your contact details.
ESKAY01972
01 January 2012 at 23:45
RESPECTED EXPERTS,
I HAVE BOOKED MARUTI SUZUKI DZIRE CAR, IN THE MONTH OF APR 2009,WHILE BOOKING CAR DEALER JAIKRISHNAA AUTOSALES PRIVATE LIMITED COIMBATORE, ASSURED CAR WILL BE DELIVERED WITHIN 2-3 MONTHS. HOWEVER HE WENT ON POSTPONING DELIVERY. I COMPLAINED TO MARUTI COMPANY AND AREA MANAGER, CHENNAI. AFTER SEVERAL COMPLAINTS DEALER DELIVERED CAR AFTER 11 MONTHS. BY THE TIME VEHICLE COST INCREASED BY 33000/-.
FOR NO FAULT I PAID EXCESS AMOUNT, FOR THIS I FILED COMPLAINT AGAINST MARUTI DEALER(RESPONDENT NO.1), MD&CEO OF MARUTI SUZUKI COMPANY (RESPONDENT NO.2)AND ALSO AREA MANAGER CHENNAI(RESPONDENT NO.3) BEFORE CONSUMER FORUM, COIMBATORE.
NOW THE RESPONDENT NO.2 & 3 HAVE FILED WRITTENT ARGUMENT, STATING THAT, THEY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE IN THIS TRANSACTION, SICE THE TRANSACTION IS BETWEEN DEALER AND BUYER, NOT BETWEEN MANUFACTURER.
KINDLY ADVISE ME,
1.WHETHER MANUFACTURER IS NOT A PARTY IN THIS ISSUE?
2.WHETHER DEALER IS LAIBLE?
PLEASE PROVIDE ME ANY CITATIONS WHICH MAY HELP IN MY CASE.
THANKING YOU,
Y/F
SENDHIL KUMAR.V
Anonymous
01 January 2012 at 18:39
Hi all respected experts I want to ask to you all about the authenticity of GPA,CASH RECIEPT,AGREEMENT TO SELL& SPA for a sale in delhi whether executing of all this above said documents transfers aq good title in buyer's favour specially in the areas where sale deed can not be executed.
karthik
01 January 2012 at 17:48
I borrowed a sum of Rs 75,000/- from a friend and paid interest for almost 15 months due to some financial problems i am unable to clear the debt and also interest and requested time for the same ......for almost 6-8 months now he is forcing me for money and threating that he would lodge a police complaint i am student, can he lodge a police complaint or sue me in court for this i gave promissory note for the same and a blank cheque also .....
How can i make him wait for next 2 months it takes time for me to get money
I am tensed as i am student may be this case and all may ruin my career
Please suuggest me some idea
Anonymous
01 January 2012 at 10:31
in maharastra court fee for complaint of sec.138 is 2% , but said amendment is not officialy published in gazzate,
am i right or wrong?
adv butala sudhir khed dist RTNAGIRI
KOTESWARA RAO
01 January 2012 at 02:13
I filed a suit of specific performance-- My client entered into oral agreement with defendant, My client got the Receipt of Rs: 2,00,000/- by way of cheque, defendant encashed the cheque also, and defendant did not came to registration of the property, then I filed the suit for specific performance suit, and I got Injuction also, now suit is at trail stage, defendant advocate objecting the for the Marking the receipt, that should be registered, now
my question is the receipt is registrtion is not necessary so we required the latest decessions of supreme court- please give the Idea how to orgue- decisions also -- please give the Idea and decitions also
thanking you
yours
VAJRAPU KOTESWARA RAO
ADVOCATE
RAJAHMUNDRY
sushil bhatt
31 December 2011 at 15:48
A Firm mortgaged its property with a Bank against loan in 2000. In the year 2001-02 the Govt. probe charges of misappropriation on the trustee of a Trust, which was run and managed by the father of one of the partner of the Firm and the properties of the trust including the properties of the relatives of the chairman of the Trust was attached by Govt. including the properties of the Firm under section 3 to 5 of A.P.Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act 1999 in the year 2002. The loan could not be repaid by the Firm. Upon notice of above attachment, the Bank sought to be impleaded in the proceedings before the lower court but could not be impleaded by the Court. However, the lower court remarked that "any sale of the property shall be subject to mortgage with the Bank".
Later on the bank approached the DRT under the approprite provisions of law mentioning the above facts of its non-impleadment in the lower court proceedings. The bank finally got the property sold through the DRT in an Auction.
We purchased the property from DRT in an auction in 2007 and now the the said partner filed a WP in the HC claiming that the sale by DRT may be declared null and void as the entire auction procedure was illegal as the property was already attached by the Govt. under A.P.Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act 1999 and secondly he has not received any notice from DRT on such auction.
Query:
1. Is there any such provision in A.P. Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act 1999 that if the property is attached under the said act, then the same can not be sold under DRT or any other law.
2. Is it not that the rights of the bank to approach DRT will prevail as the property was mortgaged in 2000 while the attachement by govt. was done in 2002.
Pls guide /suggest with supporting citations, if any.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Society asking rs.5000/- from broker
Respected Sir, I am giving my shop on rent in Mumbai. The Society used to charge me Rs.2500 as annual donation apart fron the Non occupancy charges for renting my shop and now today they said that the agent will also have to pay Rs.5000/- to the society without which they will not give me the NOC. My agent refused to pay now the society is not giving the NOC saying that they have passed this rule in general body meeting and that they will not give NOC till the agent pays. Now my agent is asking me to remove his name from the Police NOC and say that there is no agent involved. My questions are:
1.Can the Society stop the NOC if the Agent doesnot Pay.
2.Should I remove the agents name from the Police Noc and say that the deal is without the agent.Please help.