Sanjay Lavu Mungekar
31 May 2012 at 16:26
Builder is demanding 30000/- towards Muncipal water charges for 2 BHK FLAT AREA 740 SQF at VIRAR, MAHARASTRA.
I came to know that VVMC (VASAI VIRAR MUNCIPAL CORPORATION)is charging
Rs. 10000/- for 1RK
Rs. 15000/- for 1BHK
Rs. 20000/- for 2BHK and above.
with recent increased rate.
Earlier VVMC was charging Rs 5,000 for a water line, irrespective of the area of the flat.
pls advise if my information is correct.
If yes, pls let me know how to deal with the builder.
Naga
31 May 2012 at 15:03
Sir
The seller in the year 2002 gave his ancestral property through a registered gift deed to his wife and due to problems with his wife in the year 2005 he cancelled his gift through registered DEED OF REVOCATION OF GIFT SETTLEMENT and the property is in seller's possession. And the seller's wife separated by taking their two children and filed a case in the family court in the year 2006 and the contents there in are not known to us.
In the year 2008,june the seller wishes to sell the property and took an advance of Rs 3 Lacs out of a total consideration of 9 lacs from my uncle and signed an agreement and fixed a period of 5years for completion of this sale transaction . We recently know that the seller died in the year 2009,January and that property has been occupied and given to rent to others by his wife( As they are the only legal heirs) and collecting rents from them from 2009 Febraury onwards. Last month we approached her and requested to register as per the terms of this agreement to sell and she bluntly refused and warned to do whatever we wish.
My uncle is old and can not move , so is there any chance to transfer his right of the agreement, either to get registration of the property to be done or to get back his advance amount as the agreement period is not lapsed.
hari sri chunduru
31 May 2012 at 14:50
this is with reference to the query i made in this column A AND B ARE PARENTS OF THE MINOR CHILDREN I.E., A IS THE FATHER BIS THE MOTHER . WHEN B PESTERED A TO GIVE PROPERTY TO HER THEN A TRANSFERRED THE PROPERTY TO B SAYING THAT THE CHILDREN ARE BEING MINORS , B SHOULD HAND OVER THE PROPERTY THE CHILDREN WHEN THE CHILDREN ATTAINS MAJORITY BY W. AFTER THE DEATH OF A CHILDREN ATTAINED THE MAJORITY AND ARE ENJOYING THE PROPERTY WHEN THE ELDEST DAUGHTER ATTAINED AGE 85 YRS B HAS WRITTEN A WILL DEED TO 1/4TH EXTENT OF THE PROPERTY THERE IS NO WHISPER OF THE REMAINING PROPERTY WILL THE WILL DEED IS VALID WHAT ARE SUPREMECOURT JUDGEMENTS IN THIS REGARD
Jatin Agarwal
31 May 2012 at 13:40
I'll be very pleased will some one can clarify whether order XVI Rule 1 is applicable to execution proceedings?
If possible case laws also required.
brijesh sharma
31 May 2012 at 12:05
Respected Sir, My office respondent 3, in my O.A. filed in CAT Delhi has not submitted proper ccounter as istructed by respondent 2.Respondent 3 has also filled counter on behalf of respondent 1 i.e. GOI to whom respondent 3 not authorized. In my case of promotion respondent 2 is saying that my case should be put before DPC, but respondent 3 ignorring these instructions of respondent 2.What I should do?
brijesh sharma
31 May 2012 at 11:51
Sir nowdays , The CPIO and FAA belonging from same office and Department are not providing Certified copies under RTI Act 2005. They are sending/providing only photocopies.Is this procedure will be treat "not providing the information ?These photocopies not having any authenticity. what can we should do?
s$$$s
31 May 2012 at 10:27
sir,
a friend of mine is working with x.y.z university. since he was not satisfied with the job he left it. according to his agreement he has to give 3 months notice or equivalent money.his terms of contract ends on 1-6-2012 and he resigned on 20-5-2011. now the university is not allowing him to leave and has send him a legal notice.
plss guide us if there are any legal provisions which can help us as well as judgments regarding the same....
thank you plsss help us...!!!!
yash007
31 May 2012 at 09:45
WHY TORRENTS WEB SITE ARE BANNED IN INDIA ?
IS TELLING THAT BANNED AS PER HIGH COURT ORDER
WILL THEY AGAIN START ?
IS THE END OF PIRACY ?
Nishant Singh
30 May 2012 at 23:53
dear experts
i have to file a suit for recovery under order 37 rule 1 & 2 cpc. i have got only bills and not the purchase orders, have also got the tds certificate of the previous bills/payments. the orders were made telephonically as the person was known. it is a company matter. kindly advise that whether the bill generated by me is a contract. and only on the basis of bills, can a suit U/O 37 cpc be filed. there was a supreme court judgement in this regard. please guide
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Unnecessary delay and adjournments
Dear Experts,
Is there anything a common man (petitioner) can do against unnecessary delay in high court proceeding via unnecessary/unexplained adjournments?