sanjay agarwal
07 July 2012 at 15:19
sanjay agarwal Posted about 4 hours ago sir i have suit owner declaration file against both my brothers and deposited rs700 court fees in jan 2012 till now i have not got stay many dates have passed..so please tell me what should i do?????? and my father has died without any will
24/06/2012 18:56:44
sanjay agarwal :
Posted 20 days ago [Quote] [Reply] sanjay agarwal I am Online grand daughter [ Scorecard : 51] [edit] [edit photo] my grandfather have a property 4000sq m he had 4 sons after his death property was owned by his wife and after her death the property goes to hr 4 sons equally divided by mutial family settlement my father is 1 shareholder of this property and he had 3 children 2 sons 1 daughter after my parents death the 2 brothers divided the portion between themselves in 2008 and i got married in 1993 and i was born in 1969, 6 months ago i came to know that they are selling off there property after this i claimed 4 my share in jan 2012 in kanpur court ....instead of filling case against 1 of my brother he sold some part of his property in march 2012 is it possible that i am filling a case againt them but instead of this he can sell some part?????????? what should i do know??????????? please reply me soon sir plzzzzzz
Qazi Sahadat Ali
07 July 2012 at 12:19
I,Qazi Sahadat Ali have married with Najma Khan on 12-09-2010.I belong RBA(OBC)category
and possess RBA certificate but my wife is from General category. After marriage i have changed her residential documents(residential address). she is permanently residing with me at my home from the date of our marriage. Before marriage she belonged to the same state, Jammu & Kashmir, Kashmir Division, District Kupwara, and I myself belong to the same state.....I applied for RBA certificate for my wife in my tehsil headquarters, after complition of all requirements for the certificate to my wife, the present Tehsildar denied to sign on the fully completed file. My family's annual income is 180000. Now I request you
to guide me to obtain the same (RBA category certificate) in favour of my wife...........!
Adv M.D.Azhar
07 July 2012 at 11:12
sir, will u explain me in which circumstances an application under O.26, Rule. 9 of the C.P.c can be granted, because in our court has been rejecting such application on the ground that to collect the evidence such application can not be granted while we need to find out the real situation of the disputed land so if there is any authority of guj high court or S.C. court so please reply me as early as possible.
Anil Sinha
07 July 2012 at 09:16
I purchased a piece of land in Patna in 1972 of size 55 x50 ft. In front of the road there used to be a nala, which had been covered. During this period some 4 people raised mud houses encroached the road.Gradually more and more people started settling on it. In 1985, I lodged a complaint with Patna D.M. He had the matter investigated and ordered removal of encroachment.Due to laxity of the administration nothing happened and people continued settling on it. Repeated requests were made and again the administration promised to remove the encroachment and sent a magistrate to remove it but nothing happened . I filed a contempt petition in the Patna High Court and the court asked to the district administration to look into the matter and title of the encroacher before removal but again nothing happened. Instead my file was transfered to Jharkhand High Court in 2000, when the bifurcation of Bihar took place. This was instigated by a very powerful lobby , who on seeing people encroach themselves encroached at the other end of the land. I somehow managed to restore the case back to Patna High Court in 2001. The case reopened in 2011 .There were16 hearing of very frivilous nature.In all 3 judges heard the matter.The 2nd judge asked to disasscoiated himself from the case. Later the 3rd judge , who heard the matter dismissed the writ petiton on grounds that the essential parties were absent ie the encroachers. Is it my duty to serve notice to the tresspassers who number more than 60and bring them to court? The administration all along is saying they are encroachers and should be evicted. So instead of filing an SLP in Patna High Court, I have filed an S.L.P in the Supreme Court. My problem is this that it is very expensive to fight for justice there. For filing , I had to pay Rs35000/. For admission , I am asked to pay much much more. And for hearing depending on the number of hearing , I have to pay . This becomes absurd for a person like me who earns Rs250000/ per year.Can you people suggest , what is the best way out and is it wise to fight the case at all after examining the papers, I am sending as attachment.
yusufkhan
06 July 2012 at 20:05
sir i want to know that the property of dargah & kaberstan trust which was registered in the state wakf board and in the said land large numbers of people residing before long time and also pay the rent to the trusty. the board of wakf can sell out the said land to corporation without consent of rental people.
y t pathan``````
Adv M.D.Azhar
06 July 2012 at 18:58
Dear sir we are defending the suit in which plaintiff have file the suit for temporary injunction. this suit is regarding the dispute of the sale deed now sir we need a judgment which can states that in every suit temporary injunction is not necessary in the all suit, is their any judgment of the s.c. court which held that temporary injunction is not necessary to be given in all the cases. if have so please give me the citation.
yuvnesh subramanian
06 July 2012 at 14:55
Dear Sirs,
As i have acquired a property recently in bangalore, when i check the history with the original documents i came to know that in the year 1998 a natorized GPOA given to one person to deal with 25 cents of Mr.Sidappa property and that GPOA holder sold the property to Nagaraj in the year 2001 and nagaraj sold it to rajesh and then halid or sell to radhika from her i got the property. I got a doubt that remaining are sale deed. Only that Notarized GPOA in the year of 1998 is valid or not? If that is invalid then every thing is invalid? pl calrify my doubts,as some adv.friends saying that at that time in 1998 GPOA NOTARISED were accepted not an issue. some are saying there might be problems in any litigation by legal heris,pl advise me....
sushmit bansal
06 July 2012 at 10:44
I have a house in sani gaon mount abu; I want to start a paying guest house in that property. I have applied for registration of paying guest house but since I have done that my neighbor and tenant started doing mental harassment on me and my family.
My neighbor who wanted to sell his house made complain about my property in court and filled case against me and even in RTDC department. I wanted to put tin shade on my stairs for protection of rains; he thereby complained in court that I am doing an illegal construction and filled a case against me. In RTDC department he complained about not giving license of paying guest house on my property. He mentally pressurized me to buy his house and to live a peaceful life we purchased his house even at double of DLC rates. He gave me memorandum of understanding for complains he made and withdrawal his case from the court. I wanted to take a loan on the property which I was willing to purchase from my neighbor but when I asked him for documents so that I could get my loan sanctioned he started ignoring me. I even gave him notice twice for making me documents available but he replied in notice with some unrealistic answer. When the agreement date lapsed I asked him to return me the agreement amount then he told me your agreement amount is forfeited.
He even left a massage for me from a third person who is mediator between me and my neighbor that “ tell them to buy my house else I would complain about them in income tax department, sales tax department and many other department. We would make such complains that they would have a huge losses in their life”. We are ready for investigation of any department and even ready to pay fines and penalty if we are in default but not on the basis of his complain. He is mentally harassing my family for purchasing his house. I even sacrificed my profession of chartered accountancy because of my family financial conditions. To improve my family financial conditions in decided to run a paying guest house in that property.
My tenant who recently lost a case which we filled against him for vacating our premises in civil court of mount abu ; even he started harassing us by support of my neighbor. He is expecting a lump sum amount to vacate the premises but we don’t have so much money to give them.
My father is a heart patient and even my mother came in depression with all such harassments. So I kindly request you to take some appropriate actions against my neighbor and tenant. If due to such harassment anything happens to my family or I say to my father or my mother then these people would be liable.
tell me what action i can take against him.
thanks in advance.
YOGESHWAR.
06 July 2012 at 10:22
There are no of queries on this site about insolvency cases.
1) it may or may not help in criminal cases of cheque bounce but certainly can give relief for compansation and civil liabilites.
2) So what is the law for filing petition.
3) What is the normal procedure for filing the insolvency petitions.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Slp supreme court interpretation of the order
PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF THIS ORDER MEANS THE LEAVE TO SUE HAS BEEN GIVEN GRANTED IN THE MAIN CRP 2691 OF 2011.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-In-Person
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Application for permission to appear and argue
in person is allowed.
The petitioner who is appearing in person
seeks permission to withdraw the special leave
petition with liberty to agitate the matter against
the main order passed in CRP (PD) 2691 of 2011 by the
High Court. Permission is granted. The special
leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn accordingly.
HOW SHOULD I PROCEED FURTHER.