WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
17 November 2012 at 20:05
Sir,
I want to know whether an advocate-commissioner is criminally liable for the careless and negligent errors, which had crept in his commission-report ?
or
when the report has been remitted/set aside and a new report is before the court, which is purely contrary to the previous one, then, in such a case , whether , the person who made the first report can be prosecuted for any criminal offense ?
any case law on this point ?
SALIL KUMAR.P
ADVOCATE
THALASSERY-670101
MOB : 9447536929
Chetan Pardakhe
17 November 2012 at 19:40
How to declare the missing person from the Court
under what provisions and before which court either to Junior division or Senior Division ?
What are the procedures
pls reply
Sandhya
17 November 2012 at 18:10
A, B husband and wife respectively they gave 2 children i.e., "x" "y"
"X" was adopted to C&D at the time of adoption "x" age was 1 years. all are Hindu religion.
after 35 years "x" is claiming properties from A,B
"x" is having Govt Job that too sufficient to meet luxury life, in his life time entire his family as luxury.
My queries are:
1. is have "x" any right to claim property from A,B
if yes, please you can give advise with section of law or any citation.
i will be waiting for your valuable reply.
supriya
17 November 2012 at 13:54
In a Clinical Trial Agreement the Sponsor is in USA and the principal investigator/Institution is in India.
Which Law will govern in case the dispute arises? and why that law is governing the dispute?
kindly clarify please...its urgent
sarada
17 November 2012 at 13:28
We have one house (fathers).my mother ,myself my sister and brother all have equal rights on that house.now my self mother ,sister want to sell the house,my brother is not talking to us after my father death.we want legal advise to sell the property.
kulwinder singh
17 November 2012 at 09:24
My query is regarding an agreement to sell contract. I entered into a contract in which I agreed to buy some property and gave seller a deposit. I was unable to keep agreement for lack of funds and did not attend Tehsildar office on said given date. Do I have any legal recourse? Thank you in advance.
sk.shamshuddin
17 November 2012 at 02:24
RESPECTED SIR TO ALL
MY SELF SK.SHAMSHUDDIN I AM COMPLETED B.TECH AND I AM FROM VINUKONDA,GUNTUR DT ANDHRA PRADESH.
SIR MY GRAND FATHER PROPERTY IS HIS OWN.
HE WAS WRITTEN A DOCUMENT TO EQUAL SHARE OF PROPERTY BOTH SONS IN 1992.
MY GRAND FATHER HAS TWO SONS THEY ARE 1.AADAMSHFI AND 2.MAHABOOB SUBHANI(MY FATHER AND WE ARE 5 CHILD'S)
NO CHID FOR AADAMSHFI.
AADAMSHFI WIFE WAS GONE PAST 20 YEARS DUE TO ILLEGAL CONNECTION OF A WOMEN(MEHRUNBI). A HE WAS MARRIED A MEHRUNBI IN THE YEAR OF 2000. MEHRUNBI WAS ALREADY MARRIED WOMEN HIS HUSBEN WAS DIED AND SHE HAS 3 CHILD'S THEY ARE VERY ELDERS. AND AADAMSHFI WAS NO CHILDS FOR FIRST AND SECOND WIFE ALSO.
AND COMING TO POINT
IN THE YEAR 2005 AADAMSHAFI WAS SUFFERING FROM PERALASIS.AFTER 5 YEARS AADAMSHFI HEALTH IS GONE IN TO A CRITICAL POSITION IN THAT TIME HIS SECOND WIFE MEHRUNBI WAS SECRETLY DOING A DAKHALU REGISTRATION WITH AADAMSHAFI IN 2010 WITH OUT MY FATHER MAHABUB SUBHANI AND ORIZINAL DOCUMENTS OF REGISTERED PROPERTY.AND SHE WAS SOLD PROPERTY TO OTHERS.AND SHE WAS TOLD THIS IS MY HUSBAND PROPERTY AND HE WAS REGISTERED TO ME SO SOLD THAT.WE DONT KNOE THE AADAMSHAFI FIRST WIFE WAS LIVE ARE NOT AND THE AADAMSHFI GIVEN DIVERS ARE NOT BECAUSE SHE WAS GONE BEFORE 20 YEARS.THE HOUSE TAX AND ELECTRICITY BILLS ARE MY GRAND FATHER NAME UP TO NOW.THE BUYER TRY TO BREAK THE HOUSE. ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS OF HOUSE IS IN OUR HANDS
I ARE MY FATHER HAS ANY WRITES TO SAVE OUR PROPERTY HOW?
FEW DAYS BACK I MEET A MUSLIM LAWYER HE SAID "YOU AND YOUR FATHER DON'T HAVE ANY WRITES TO STOP ARE OBJECTION THE DAKHAL REGISTRATION.
SO SIR PLEASE GIVE ME A SUGGESTION HOW TO SAVE OUR PROPERTY
THANKING YOU SIR
Narsing Sahu
17 November 2012 at 01:16
please tell me how to get my sahara housing bonds money back please tell me how to apply.
Rajneesh Madhok
16 November 2012 at 19:40
Whether Lok Adalat can not make directions to any department for the case filed in Lok Adalat,
*Whether the case filed before Lok Adalat has no right to make directions
As Food & Supplies Department, Punjab and Block Development & Panchayat officer had been violating their own policies in issue of Ration Card meant for Below Poverty Line i.e. Blue card issued by Punjab Government. The application under Lok Adalat filed at Phagwara Lok Adalat and the evidences with regard to the entitlement of the person who has been deprived of getting Ration card has been submitted with proofs. The lady whose family has been denied to issue the Ration Card meant for Below Poverty Line is a beggar and collect alms by door to door begging. Whether the beggar who collect alms by door to door begging can be issued Ration Card meant for Above Poverty Line. The Sarpanch has not attested her application for issuing ration card meant for Below Poverty Line. The repeated application submitted to Block Development and Panchayat Officer and Food & Civil Supplies Department as well as to Sarpanch of the Village. Both the concerned departments failed to heed the ear on the requests.
The Case filed before the Lok Adalat is lingering on from the last one year in the court. On the last hearing the Presiding Officer said that though both of the departments have not issued her the Ration Card meant for Below Poverty Line and both of the departments says that such Ration Cards are being issued as per the directions of the Central and State Governments, As now there is no such directions so the card will not be issued to that lady and her family.
CONSIDERABLE POINTS THAT THE PRESIDING OFFICER SAID IN LAST HEARING:
1. That the Lok Adalat can not make directions to any department for the case filed in Lok Adalat, we can amicably resolve the matter only.
2. Provide me the powers empowered to Lok Adalat in which the Presiding officer can make directions to the parties if the matter is not amicably resolved.
3. Tomorrow is the last date to decide in the matter and Presiding officer has given deadline that the case will be decided tomorrow if you fail to provide the rules that Lok Adalat has been empowered to make directions.
4. That under Lok Adalat the Presiding officer and the members have not empowered to make directions, THE PRESIDING OFFICER SAID THAT PERMANENT LOK ADALAT HAS BEEN EMPOWERED TO MAKE DIRECTIONS (WHICH IS DISTRICT BASED COURT). WILL ANY BODY WILL PROVIDE DETAILS WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LOK ADALAT AND PERMANENT LOK ADALAT AND HOW THE PERMANENT LOK ADALATS ARE EMPOWERED TO MAKE DIRECTIONS AND LOK ADALTS ARE NOT EMPOWERED TO DIRECT TO THE CONCERNED DEPARTMENTS.
5. In the petition placed before the Presiding officer of Lok Adalat it has been proved that the departments have failed to comply with the rules set by their own departments. When it is proved that the violations to the rules have been made then whether the Lok Adalat is not empowered to direct the departments concerned to comply with the rules.
6. That when the representations, followed by legal notice and the written submission and arguments have been made and lastly the new funda that the Petitioners case is that though the Respondent authorities are violating their own policies but the directions can not be made to the Respondents, so in view of the above mentioned points the case will be disposed of and the beneficiary will be deprived of their rights. WHETHER IT IS NOT THE INFRINGEMENT OF LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC.
7. WHETHER WE CAN’T REQUEST TO THE LOK ADALAT AT THIS STAGE THAT KINDLY PROVIDE DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENTS TO TAKE COGNISANCE OF THE REPRESENTAION/ LEGAL NOTICE RECEIVED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS AND REDRESS THEIR GRIEVANCES AIN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW/POLICY BY PASSING A SPEAKING ORDER WITHIN A STIPULATED PERIOD.
8. That the Opposite parties failed to produce before the court why not the Ration Card has been issued to the Deprived persons of the society.
9. Whether the Court has not been empowered to Issue any direction. Whether the Lok Adalat .
10. Whether the LOK Adalat can not decide on the matter of principles, and a public cause.
11. That the public knocked the door of the court to get justice if it is proved that there are violations of rules and if the officials are not following the rules framed by their department then whether the dispute arose and the matter should be disposed of without any directions in the matter.
12. Whether the citizens can be deprived of Food and Kerosene and other items due to No directions to issue fresh Ration card from more than 10 years by the State / Central Government.
13. IN BRIEF THERE IS NO SHORTAGE OF FOOD GRAINS AND PROTECTIVE FOODS IN THE COUNTRY BUT THE ACCESS TO POOR ER SECTION OF SOCIETY TO FOOD, FOR WHICH THOSE POLICIES HAVE BEEN FRAMED UNDER PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AT THE SUBSIDIZED RATES TO ISSUE FOODGRAINS, PULSES, IILS, FUEL OIL (KEROSENE) ETC. THE FACT IS THAT IN REALITY THE MAJOR PART OF THESE COMMODITIES NEVER REACH THE TARGETED POPULATION AND THOSE ITEMS ARE BEING DIVERTED TO MARKETS BY POLITICIANS, BUREAUCRATS AND THEIR CRIMINAL SYDICATES. AND WHEN THE APPLICATION IN THIS REGARD HAS BEEN PUT BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT, THE SAID COURT AFTER ONE YEAR OF CONTINUOUS HEARINGS NOT CONSIDERING THE REAL ASPECTS OF JUSTICE.
14. It is the corruption, diversion of Foodgrains and other essential commodities meant for the poor to the open market by the mafias, wastages and mismanagement of stocks that are adversely and very seriously affecting the supplies to the targeted beneficiaries.
15. When the guidelines have not been implemented then how the justice can be provided to the public.
Rajneesh Madhok,
B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar,
St. No 2, Railway Road,
Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
Ph: 01824-262569 (O), 268210 (R), 094173-06415 (M)
Tele-fax: 01824-262569, E-mail: rmadhok_pgm@bsnl.in ; rajneesh_madhok@yahoo.com
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Sub delegation of powers
dear sir, i bought a property in tamilnadu of india in the year 2004 from x as a power agent of y and enjoying the same property till date. i.e. possession is with me.now one person disturbed me through a registered document in the year 2007 in his name. he says that he has purchased the same property from z in the year 2007.z has purchased the same property from w who is the power agent of x in the year 1975.y is the actual owner of the property and x is his power agent.w is the power agent of x.in the power document submitted by x, y had not given any specific powers to made over his powers to any. x had given power to w only to sell his property in the year 1975. but w using that power to sell the property of y stating that he has power to sell the property of y as he was the power agent of x.the matter is now on the court.our lawyers says that a power of attorney cannot delegate his power to others to sell a property. so the document executed by w is invalid. the defendant is saying that there is no such rules in the olden periods.the actual power document given by y to x has no provisions about sub delegation of powers. but the defendant says the power given by x to w is enough to sell the property of y by w. please give me your legal opinion about this issue. can a power agent delegate his powers to others to sell a property? the defendant documents or the sale deed of z or the power deed executed by x to w never showed any clauses about sub delegation of power to register the property. please advice me and provide me if there any citations in this regard. thanking you.