adv.durgadas k.kulkarni
13 December 2012 at 22:32
Respected experts,
I want ur valuable advice on following facts of the suit.
Plaintiff filed suit for mandatory injunction seeking possession by removing encroached portion by defendant no.1 over his 20 Sq.Mtrs. land and 90 Sq.Mtrs. Govt. land which is adjacent to his land.
C.J.J.D. ordered T.I. in plaintiff's favour and restrained deft.No.1 to construction over suit land.
He also made Municipal Council as defendant No.2.The claim against deft.No.2 is that,deft.No.2 be directed to remove the encroached portion made by deft.no.1.
In March 2012 deft.no.2 held encroachment removal drive in our city.During the said drive deft.no. 2 removed encroachment made by deft.no.1 over the Govt.land to the extent of 90 Sq.Mtrs.
Plaintiff's mandatory injunction claim regarding to Govt.land has now fulfilled.
Issues has not been framed yet.
Now plaintiff wants to abandon a part of his claim u/o.23 R.1 of c.p.c. to the extent of 90 Sq.Mtrs. of Govt.land.
Will it better for plaintiff or not?
Is any way available to plaintiff to withdraw his part claim?
Member (Account Deleted)
13 December 2012 at 19:20
Sir,
Wakf property situated in Punjab. Will you please kind enough what procedure to be followed by Sub Divsional Magistrate to vacate wakf Property Under Section 55 of Wakf Act 1995.Also send me form No.60 & 61& 62& 75
gopal
13 December 2012 at 13:50
Respected sirs,
Our family have a piece of land, which is in survey No 195/1A, 1B,1C (the total extent of these 3 survey number is 1 acre 64 cents) these 3 survey numbers are comes under one patta number.
the patta stands on my father name and my father's younger brother name and 2 more persons(that 2 more persons are not relations but they are share holders in total extent).
In this situation my father's younger brother and 2 more persons had sold the entire property without including my father ,the sale deed is registed.
Is it possible to sold like that? is it leagal a sub-registrar allow this type of registrations?
In what ground a sub registrar allow to register a sale deed?
On sale deed registration what are the procedures follow by the sub registrar as per the Registration act 1908?
Pls kindly clarify the doubt
regards
nandagopal
Rajpal Sharma
13 December 2012 at 11:06
Dear All
Who should have the custody of Registered Lease Deed, Lessor or Lessee?? Please refer case laws also.
Thanks in advance.
Rajpal Sharma
Ashwin Goswami
13 December 2012 at 02:04
The Flat Owners Association (forms in the year 2003-2004) is not registered with the competent authority of state Of Gujarat.
Can Unregistered Association impose to follow bye laws on the flat owners?
dhiru
12 December 2012 at 23:27
whether archeological survey can became the owner of any private area only by declaration of area as protected under subsection 3 of section 4 of AM and ASR act 1958 ? whether they does not need to follow section 5 and section 6 of the act for ownership of area ?
Member (Account Deleted)
12 December 2012 at 22:09
Respected Expert,
Will you please kind enough how the enforcement of order 54 of wakf act 1995 be made. What is the procedure. Also intimate me latest amendment in Section 55 of wakf act 1995 if any.
Jeevan Kumar Jyoti
12 December 2012 at 18:51
A person is retired clerk and 66 years old. He has only one son and two daughters, but his son is criminal and of criminal mind. His first daughter is married and another is unmarried. His son often assaults him for property and money. He has ejected his son from his property by will. Two times he gave information to Chief Judicial Magistrate for criminal activity of his son, but his son is still leaving in his house, and often assaults him and his wife. Now my question is that, how this person will evict his son from his house?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ptcl case
Hi
Mr Krishna has purchased a property in 1969 by bashachar, bashachar has purchased this land by krishna's brouther's in 1961. krishna's brouther's have sold this property by changening the syno, according to the village map its 66 but they mentioned as 112, all the revenue records till 2010 mentioned as 112 only, krishna as changed the syno from 112 to 66, now there is a person who say's that the property syno 112 was granted to his grand father so he has filled a ptcl case against krishna, krishna has transfered the property by gift deed to his grand son(first son's son) in feb 2011, in dec 2011 krishna died, krishna had not attended the case till death, krishna had 3 son's, krishna's second son has attended the court he is fighting, but the property is in name of grandson, the grandson has not received any notice from them, there r no revenue record's of both syno 66 and 112 before 1961 in taluk office, there is only a grant order copy, which says 112 was granted in the name of the applicant's grandfather name kaverga, in 66 the krishna's father name kaverga, both name's are similar, both belongs to the same cast, now what should the grandson do, should he attend the case or wait...