B Singh
11 January 2013 at 19:00
Joint property after the parents were transferred to all members as per revenue record during the year 1998. But one brother filed civil suit (Permanent Injuction)in the year 1999. He filed civil case injuction on the basis by producing simple affidavit of year 1982 that allegal heirs have signed that that the said property is his. Although the court has given stay on this matter and ordered that nobody can sell the said property. My query is that when as per revenue records the property has divided on all legal heirs in the year 1999 and now my brother has produced simple affidavit of the year 1982 (after 17 years) is not this a time barred. Moreover the affidavit is simply attested from notory who name and number is also not mentioned and from which stamp vendor he had produced in the years 1982 it's record is also not found with the stamp vendors now. Please advice
Puneet bhasin
11 January 2013 at 16:20
I have a property in Delhi. And the Question is.
There are 2 wills A & B.
A has executed a registered will in favor of B and then B has executed an unregistered will in favor of C.
A died and B also Died. Now C is seeking the probate of WILL executed by B. whether it is correct or not and whether the probate shall be granted to C or not if not why what is the reason please tell and if YES how ?? Also need the JUDGEMENT to prove it to be TRUE..
Please reply me the above query as soon as possible... waiting for your positive reply ..
Narender Singh
11 January 2013 at 13:02
Dear Sir,
we are very confused on court fees the same shall be applicable on sale deeds amount or circle rate.Please clarify the civil suit will be filled on Delhi High Court.The total cost of sold aggriculture land is 4.10 cr in sale deed. We want to file a fresh suit in delhi high court for cancelation of sale deed and i want to know the cost of court fees which shall applicale sale deed amount or circle rate.
Regards
Narender Singh
Aman
11 January 2013 at 04:40
Can a High Court hear two petitions (filed by the same person) together, if the facts and merits of both the petition are similar ? One of which is in civil nature and other being a criminal petition.
If yes, then can both these petitions be rejected by a 'common order' or different orders are required for rejecting both the petitions?
Ramkrishna
10 January 2013 at 21:51
Can Concealing the matterial fact in the O.S unintentionally would constitute prejury
Ramkrishna
10 January 2013 at 21:33
Sir,
I am living in an apartment complex which does not have an registered association and neither any bye-laws.
The affairs of the maintenance is entrusted to one of the flat owner for a period of one year.
The present owner who has been looking into the matters of our flats has increased the maintenance citing repairs carried out by him.
I objected to this increase as he has not informed about the repairs which he says he has done without informing the owners and taking their opinion.
He takes into confidence those owners who are amicable to his ideas and does not inform other owners either thru a meeting or through a circular.
I have been paying the regular monthly maintenace and refused to pay the increased amount, the rest of the flat owners and tenants have paid the excess amount.
In a recent meeting they have decided to take action against those who have not paid the excess amount by way of disconnecting water supply to that apartment.
The maintenance amount which I have been paying covers the watchmans salary, common electricity, water and sewage bills and other sundry expenses.
I kindly wish to know whether this un-registered association which does not have any set of proper bye laws and changes the rules as per the wishes of a few owners has the power to disconnect the water supply which is considered to be a basic necessity to a human being to my apartment
MohammedRaffiq Bijapur
10 January 2013 at 21:32
Can the affidavits presented before the Court or Officer or in the proceedings before an Arbitrator be considered as evidence under the Indian Evidence Act?
aakash
10 January 2013 at 17:57
Experts Plz explain The folloowing "
Issue notice to opposite party fixing 06.02.2013.
The counter affidavit may be filed within the aforesaid period or else charges
may be framed after summoning the noticee.
However, one more opportunity is granted to the opposite party to comply
with the order within a month. If by the next date fixed the directions of the
Writ Court are not complied with and an affidavit to that effect is not filed the
opposite party shall remain present before this Court."
kashif
10 January 2013 at 16:19
During the pendency of an injunction suite regarding a plot of agricultural land, the plaintiff died leaving one son (married) and one daughter (still unmarried). The son filed an application in the court with an affidevit in both of which he said that his father left only one successor i.e the son himself. He prayed the court to put the word "late" with his father name and record his name adjacent to the name of his late father as plaintiff. Did he committed any crime in submitting this erronious inforamation in court and if it is than what should be the line of action of the respondants in this case? THX
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Daughters right in ancestral property
does supreme court have given decision in past in which the court has given equal share to daughter in ancestral property.
i read somewhere that supreme court has given such decision in case of ganduri devi.and many other examples in past where daughter was given equal right like son.
if experts have some views on it then please share..