Member (Account Deleted)
04 February 2013 at 11:42
Respected experts, kindly help me.
-
My institute has issued a certificate to me under my pressure after 7 months of examination which is fake.It contains signature of the counselor and the receptionist and not the institution head.How to prove that this certificate is fake?
How to and where to lodge a complaint of unfair tread practice and how would it proceed.
I did MBA in a institute under Punjab Technical University.
ksvrajuadv
04 February 2013 at 10:47
Hi Experts,
One of my friend open franchise of loan providing company in his area.company giving loans under different headins like home loan,shop loan,plat loan, plot loan,student loan etc,my friend arranged 8-10 clients for company & complete all documentations of those clients along with demand drafts of amount about Rs 25000/ on the name of company,clients also spent money on the name of processing fee,file charge etc.Afterwards company denied all loans on arbitrialy & refused their cases.My friend gave them Rs 15,000/ as franchise fee Spent about Rs 2,00,000 for office & other misllenous purpose..Now all clients are asking for money from my friend & threat him to file cases aganist him.Plz suggest me which has suitable remedy of my friend aganist company.Reply soon its very urgent.
N.J. MISHRA
04 February 2013 at 10:01
Dear Member kindly advise me on my below mentioned query;
That previously our company was Liaison office of a foreign based company, now it been registered as an Indian Company with slight change in its name. Previusly it was known as Pte. Ltd. and now it is registered as Pvt. Ltd.
Certain employees were involved in misconduct and now i have to issue notice to them who had contract with Pte. Ltd.
My Query is that whether i should issue notice on Pte. Ltd. Letter Head or on Pvt. Ltd Letter Head.
AAVADHOOT. D
03 February 2013 at 22:35
Sir, I am student & jobless.I had seen a almost 25 years old roadside PEEPAL tree being cut which was harmless. The tree cutting contractor was contacted over mobile and asked whether he has cutting order. He said I'll ask DFO to talk to you and produce the order in 10-15 mins to city corporation to whom the ownership rests.(Act says so).The tree was half cut up to 10-12 ft.The contractor did not turn up to produce order. In good faith,I reported and lodged oral complt noted in register, with Commissioner and environmental engr.of city corporation and cutting was stopped. The tree is now standing half cut up to 15 ft. Actually there is a apartment/shopping complex coming up and he does not want that tree which is on right corner on the road after footpath.He has caught hold of Electricity board to issue a 3 line note to state to forest that this tree is harming ele. line and the entire tree be cut.On this forest has acted and auctioned the tree @ 31000/-. The contractor was issued order after 2-3 days of I complaining to all authorities. He sent notice to withdraw complaint, I refused as tree was harmless and the Ele. line was not High Tension and a branch(if at all) was sufficient to cut,than entire tree, which is environmentally and religiously valuable.
Now, he has sued me for 50000/-+int. at 1st JMCf(Jr Dvn)stating because of my lodging complaint he has suffered above loss and want me to pay.
Sir Please guide to defend with citations and other provisions of various laws like Civil law,Indian constitution and environmental law.
I will be highly obliged if I get supportings and authorities.
Mohan R
03 February 2013 at 20:55
Dear Experts,
In probate case of regd will of my late father,its at the stage of admission and denial of documents. There are 2 objectors who have identical annexures in their respective reply, but they don't have the originals or certified copies of these.Both objectors are colluding and have sinister designs. Therefore please advice??
Q1) Shall I as petitioner insist on the original and not admit or deny a copy.
Q2) I understand courts do ask to admit or deny if original is not available.
Q3) The annexures are to be denied by me anyway,(copy or original).... so what is the best advice.
Q4) Can the experts advise the relevant Order and Rule number for admission/denial of documents in CPC.
Thanks
Gaurav Pandya
03 February 2013 at 13:11
Complainant has Loan Account and Saving Account is same branch of the bank.
However, bank has ceized saving account unauthorrisedly...
does bank have power to ceize saving account without prior notice or else. ?
Narayanan
03 February 2013 at 12:28
Respected Sirs,
Mr.A filed suit (mis-joining cause of action) having two distinct nature against Mr.B. (The documents filed along with the Plaintiffs was only speaking of damage claim). First prayer is for damage claim on being acquittal of criminal proceedings and second prayer for mandatory injunction against removing obstruction over a path. Most of the paragraph in plaint is leading to claiming of property(declaration). Defendant filed his W/S denying the claims. Issues were framed regarding Plaintiff’s entitlement to get removal of obstruction (Mandatory Injunction) and entitlement amount claimed as damage. Thereafter later through interim application Plaintiff sought production of documents . Inspite of objection the court allows the application and documents got marked which are leading to declaration. Copies of the documents were granted to the defendant only after marking. But the nature of suit is damage claim. Plaintiffs have not sought for any amendment of plaint.
Now the question of defendant is
1. Will those documents which speak about title cause prejudice to the defendant if unchallenged?
2. Can defendant challenge those documents later in different proceedings against the plaintiffs?
3. Is there any citation citing ‘Irrelevant documents shall not cause prejudice’?
4. Should defendant file additional W/S or Counter Statement to challenge or deny the genuineness, execution or binding nature of documents before cross examining the Plaintiffs?
5. Can defendant still move application to file counter claim and/or additional W/S on obtaining copies of the documents.
Naval Rungta
03 February 2013 at 11:16
In a Execution Petition pending in City Civil Court in Mumbai in regard to Consent Term Order passed by the court the learned lawyer defendants claimed that the said order should have been registered and stamped which according to common sense is not necessary. Pl. clarify if I am misinformed.
The said lawyer also claim that the property in question was to be sold out with in 6 months by a private treaty as per court decree and now the decree is null & void as sale did not take place with in 6 months.
This again is a argument to fool around with judicial system of the country. Pl. correct if it is true.
Divya
03 February 2013 at 09:20
Dear Experts
I need your inputs how to handle this pubic fraud.
My brothers were never sent some arbitration awards and directly the matter was put before executing court for property attachment and arrest f debtors.
Now the state is that I investigated the matter, and the truth came out that this particular arbitrator in connivance the leading bank had never dispatched arbitration award cum notices. Everything was done ex-party and infact the postal authorities put by the bank show that the award communication is sent deliberately to fake addresses.
This fraud is not just done on my brothers, it has been done on several others and is continuing to be to be done on other defaulters also.
This is indirectly a scam.
How do I tackle this? Should a public notice of caution be issued in newspapers or should a letter cum legal notice be sent to all judges in the country (atleast Maharashtra and also to the Supreme Court).
Please suggest the right legal remedy as people are being victims of a big fraud.
Thankyou
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Degree validation act
Dear experts , what is the time limit for an a court degree.that is on concept degree, i heared there is an citation on degrees ,after 1982-or 1985 if any court decree obtained it shall be not valid null and void. is it is correct , and if the person shall not impleded in concorned revenue records still date on court decree which is [1992] can it is valid ? kindly give me advise ..thanking you sirs