Sanjay Dhiman
21 April 2013 at 16:10
The maker of will,i.e Husband, can impose a condition, that after his death his wife will be the owner of the house, till her life and after that his two sons would be owner equally. He died, after his death his wife, against that condition, gifted the said house to only one son,
Question is :
1. whether he (deceased) could imposed such condition in his will, as per latest citation of supreme court, because i have heard somewhere that according to earlier judgments he could, but now it has been held he could not, pls explain the same...
2. whether wife was become full fledged owner to take any decision for house in question?
tdeli
21 April 2013 at 14:09
If any judgement is passed by any Civil Judge does it becomes law for that jurisdiction city/land or only the judgements of High Court or higher courts become Law.
Thanks ...
M R Shaikh
21 April 2013 at 03:01
Respected Sir,
A temporary government servant whose service have been terminated after 4 years of Continues service under Central Civil Services Rule 5 Sub Rule 1 by paying One month salary with out holding any opportunity of hearing and the applicant have challenged the order in the CAT and it is Still Pending for final order.In the mean time due to unemployment the applicant can get another job on the basis of temporary government service , whether he is eligible for getting Experience Certificate from the Employer and if employer deny to issue the experience Certificate then What is The remedy available for applicant to Get Exp Certificate or he is not entitile for exp certificate at all.?
sohan shetty
20 April 2013 at 20:23
i need suggestion mr.x as acquired our kumki land adjacent to our varga land n also he as cultivated rubber plants 2 years back n fenced it around 2.25 acres.what is the procedure now to remove his rights n its is not registered its still in governments name.please guide me
haresh
20 April 2013 at 18:45
i am working in nagrik co-op bank
i leave job last month
my serviced has done 6 year
our bank staff service rule for gratuity is
10 year
gujart guvernment rule for gratuity is 5 years.
lic has no problem for giving gratuity
but bank is not sending letter of lic
so i am able to get gratuity.
tell me what can i do
jyotsna
20 April 2013 at 12:32
There is a one registered co-operative society wherein committee themselves had decided to renovate the building which includes plastering & colouring part but the most of the society members were not ready for the same subsequently committee member themselves renovated building by their own.. and now other society members got the notice from Mumbai District Co Operative Housing Federation LTD...for demanding the renovated expeses of Rs. 200000/- from each member of the society and second notice also received form Mumbai District Co Operative Housing Federation LTD(MDCGFL) U/s 156 of MCS act 1960 Rule 107 of MCS Act also received from them fir if not deposited sum of the amount or not returned the amount decided ...there movable & immovable property will be attach within next 15 days
so what is the right of Mumbai District Co Operative Housing Federation LTD here?
How MDCGFL can interfere in this issue?
Can they send notice to the society members? for not paying their dues? when they were not ready for it?
Can committee alone themselves can take decisions for society?
what are the rights of Society members?
please guide for society members....
Regards
Jyotsna S
Advocate
Aseem Vaishya
20 April 2013 at 10:02
A writ petition was filed against the illegal action on the part of the M.P. Government, though that petition was dismissed on merit, against which a Writ Appeal No.462/2012 was filed. This Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass an order in pursuance of the government order dated 18.9.2012. The letter dated 18.9.2012 which was issued by the State of M.P. , Bhopal taken a decision to the effect, that if the petitioner agree to withdraw the case from Hon’ble Court all necessary requirements i.e. transferring and mutation of requisite land will be done at once. It was an assurance as depicted from the letter dated 18.9.2012. On this very basis a writ appeal was withdrawn and the order was passed by this Hon’ble Court on that basis, so this letter merged into the order of this Hon’ble Court
By virtue of decision taken by the Government on 18.9.2012 the appeal was disposed of and the relevant observation is as under:
“According to us, the doubt, which has been carved out in the mind of the learned senior counsel for the appellant appears to be baseless because the order of the State Government Annexure D dated 18.9.2012 is to be complied with in its stricto sensu. In the light of order dated 18.9.12 of the State Government, the observations made by learned Writ Court in the impugned order will not come in the way of the appellant/writ petitioner.”
After submitting the application along with the order dated 21.9.2012 the MP Govt. did not like to take the action in pursuance of the order which merged in the order of the Hon’ble High Court’s order nor given any response to the application, thereafter repeatedly applications were submitted on 10.6.2012 and 10.10.2012. ultimately when respondents did not turn to act in government order as well as the order of the Hon’ble High Court in which the government decision has been merged, we had a cause to serve a contempt notice on 13.2.2013
The reply to the notice has been given by the contemnors. In reply to the notice in which some new terms and conditions have been mentioned which are totally illegal and in contravention of the order passed by Hon’ble High Court
My question to learned counsels is whether M P Government can impose new terms and condition even after above order of Hon'ble High Court ? We have moved a contempt application in High Court and notices are served. What should be our further plan ?
Thanking you.
with regards
Aseem
MOTILAL JHALANI
20 April 2013 at 06:56
Dear Sir,
My one of the friend has recorded conversation with his customer on the mobile to keep it as a prof if the customer deny any thing.
Is it legal?
Yhanking you
Yours faithfully
(Motilal Jhalani)
srinivas
19 April 2013 at 23:25
sir,i have given a pro note to a person and i wrote 100000/on tope of the pro note i singned bottom,remain idid not complete. after words that person changed the figures of 100000 to 160000.the changing of first zero in one lakh easily we can identify with naked eye.and he filled the pro note in words one lakh sixty thousand only.now he filed a case against me.i request the honourble judge to send the document to forensic expert on my expencess.now i want know if any corection on the pro note the authorised person singnature{near correction area} is requried or not.plese tell me what i have to do now.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Eviction shoot
hi, i have bought a shop for my own requirement in jaipur rajasthan which is under tenancy by previous landlord since 1984 and the rent is only 1500 rupees.so i can say that those people are not my tenants. i have given them a notice stating that i have bought this shop for my own purpose so please left that property. but they are not ready for the same. what should i do in this condition? please help....