I want to prove spot panchnama in an injunction suit. The original panchanama drawn by police and sent to tahsildar is lost as pursis/report to that effect is given by Tahsildar to court. Fortunately my client had obtained 'true copy' of the same from tahsildar office, I produced the same on record. I prayed for witn. sum. to the officer from tahsildar office who had put the endorsement as 'true copy' who stated in evidence that he had seen the original. Court has exhibited the document only for the purpose of identification of sign. by witn. Now I prayed witn. sum for police who drawn the panchanama to prove the contents of the same, am I correct? or whether it is necessary for me to move an application for permission to lead secondary evidence?
In an injunction I want to prove spot panchanama. The original panchanama which was with Tahsildar is lost as he filed pursis to that effect on record. Fortunately my client had obtained true copy from tahsildar office earlier, I produced the same on record. I examined officer who put endorsement on the panchanama as 'true copy'. Court has exhibited the same only because witness identified his signature as true copy who has deposed that he had signed only after seeing the original and the same is not available in his office now. I want to prove the contents of panchanama. I have prayed for witness sum. for police who had drawn the panchanam, is it enough or I will have to move application for permission to lead secondary evidence? what procedure should I follow? pl help.
sk..........
29 June 2013 at 17:47
In civil suit,i am the defendant , in original written statement i has not mentioned some facts, pl.advice should i file additional w.s
or shall make application for amendment of the written statement.
SSV
29 June 2013 at 15:21
Dear Sir,
We are Hindu by Cast, My Mother in Law has 5 sisters (two of them Died) & 3 Bothers (All Died)Means they are total 6 sisters & 3 brother, they have a big property house value around 3 crores of their father (earned by him) but did not create will at the time of his death, his wife & my mother in laws mother also died but stated that its property belongs to only three sons on a plain paper, now 3 brothers sons are denying to give share to 6 sisters. My query is what is the right of 6 sisters along with 3 bothers sons on the said property?
And if we try to take stay order on sell of the property by the 3 brothers sons, can we get stay order & if we can get stay order what will be the validity of stay order which will be passed by session court because somebody told us that stay order is valid only for two year after stay order passed by the court?
s b krishna
29 June 2013 at 14:00
whether a borrower can challenge an order under section 14 of the securitisation act before the DRT ? Any recent decisions ?
pratik
29 June 2013 at 13:48
if the tenant himself wants to develop the land obtain by him under section 32 g of BTAAL ACT, then
1. whether the permission under section 43c is require. (here tenant do not want to transfer his land)
6. whether any other permission is require under any law
please help
thank you
sk..........
29 June 2013 at 12:42
I.A IS dismissed in lower court now can i appeal in high court , is it c.r.p or c.m.p
,then if in high court the petition is dismissed what is the solution.
sk..........
29 June 2013 at 12:39
IN CIVIL SUIT I AM SELF REPRESENTING THE CASE ,I AM DEFENDANT PL. ADVICE ,FOR FILING PETITIONS EACH AFFIDAVIT SHOULD IT BE ATTESTED BY ADVOCATE OR IS IT NOT NECESSARY TO GET ATTESTED BY ADVOCATE ,THE AFFIDAVIT WITH PETITION.
Dear sir,
As i signed contract bond for one year but left the company with in one month . what will be the consequence and what measures should i take .please help me
Civil procedure code
what is the legal consequences if written statement will not be filed by the plaintiff.
under what provision of C.P.C written statements of counter is to be filed.