GANGO PADHYAYA
19 December 2013 at 18:17
Sir
Father wrote a registered will 1996
according to that two properties one property to elder brother and second brother
where as 2000 father gifted the property (what ever wrote on according to will under those terms and conditions he gifted the property to second brother) in the said gift elder brother is one of the witness
There upon he obtained municipal plan and bank loan constructed
where as elder brother son fraudulently obtained will and staying in ground floor
It is pertain to mention that fraudulently elder brother son by playing fraud cancel said gift deed
After knowing all these second son filed a suit challenging the said gift deed cancellation
Second son : has Municipal plan, Bank Loan, welfare maintenance documents of his father, Original will 1996
Assignment Land: cases had happen in between father and government in the year 1979
suit for injunction obtained by father
THE SAID LAND WAS GIFTED TO SECOND SON
WHAT ARE STEPS TO BE TAKEN BY SECOND SON TO WIN THE CASE
ts
19 December 2013 at 17:40
Hello,
I have asked this question earlier too but it had difference of opinions, so it became more confusing, so i am asking this question in detail now -
My rent Agreement says the following -
" ....enjoy and avail the tenancy of the shop on monthly rent of Rs.2,000/- and the said rent will be paid to the party before 12th of each calender month against proper receipt."
My query is -
Does the Rent for the Month of December 2013 be paid by 12th December 2013 or by January 2013 "...
My understanding is -
1.It should be January 2013 as it does not mentions any where that it is Advance Rent Payable and
2.The Rent should be paid only after the tenant has enjoyed the utilization of the place for a month .
OR
Does the word - "Before 12th of each calender month " here means "Before the 12th of That month itself"
Thanks ...
sk..........
19 December 2013 at 17:26
In civil suit when a petition [i.a]is pending
can the plaintiff file a memo, is this allowed when application is pending
sk..........
19 December 2013 at 17:24
In civil suit the defendant has not filed any documents in evidence,now will this be beneficial or loss to plaintiff.
Adv. Hemangi Jade
19 December 2013 at 16:52
Dear Experts,
If I want to file Suit for declaration for Flat as against the Vendor and other parties.
My Client had purchased the Flat in the year 2011 and now Vendor(previous owner) is absconding and has created third party interest in the title.
my Client is unable to provide Vendor's last known address as previously he was residing in the disputed Flat.
Please guide.
Sompalli Koteswara Rao
19 December 2013 at 15:08
Please clarify the court fees for succession certificate for worth of Rs10 lakhs.
Uday Kumar
19 December 2013 at 12:46
Dear Sir,
1. Affidavit by way of Evidence was attested by Oath Comm and submitted before court by the Witness.
2. In Cross Examination A question was put to the Witness that " Where you have signed this Affidavit at Point "A" and Point "B"
3. In Reply, Witness stated that " I have signed this Affidavit in my office"
That Means, Affidavit not signed before Oath Commissioner Hence in My View That Affidavit cannot be read in evidence.
Hence I am looking at assistance from all my Senior and Colleague Advocate to assist me in providing Export Comment as well as Case Law on this point. Shall Appreciate
Uday Kumar
U&K Law Associates
9810868162
Uday Kumar
19 December 2013 at 09:37
Dear Sir,
Effect : Witness did not sign Affidavit inn front of Oath Commissioner , Hence Affidavit of Witness cannot be read in evidence
Kindly advise if any related judgment we can find on this point
With Regards
Uday Kumar
Aadvocate
9810868162
Joseph Vincent
19 December 2013 at 01:37
My simple question is- after 2nd appeal if judgement is not favour for me, what is the next steps in high court..? is there any third appeal? or kindly list out the name next procedure?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Whether boundary walls are included in plot area ?
I have a tenant in left portion of my shop having 4' x 18' carpet area (excluding boundary walls).
Later I agreed to sell 4' x 18' portion (in which he is already in possession) to him.
Now he is saying that he will purchase only the 4' x 18' area inside the walls.
This means that he will get area of 5'' x 18' (under left wall) for free.
What is your opinion ?
Whether the left wall shall be included in his Area ?