Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

anil kumar agarwal   07 February 2014 at 20:27

Filing

i submitted a appeal in state administrative tribunal in the month of sept.2013 but nothing happen expect giving dates so as per advise of my lawyer i submitted withdrawal application and tribunal rejected my appeal as withdrawn .later on i filled appeal in high court on hearning someone filled a application under 1/10 for making party and pleaded that i can not filled writ in highcourt because i had withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a fresh.kindly guide with rulling

GANGAM.RAJENDER.   07 February 2014 at 20:02

Agreement amount not paid ,lok adalat appeal possible

respected experts,
the lokadalat case has been compromised on dated 23-nov-2013.
before the lokadalat the parties compromised with the conditions were written on the (100 rs) bond paper.
1.the plaintiffs are agreed to pay 28 lakhs to the defendants for compromise and they initially paid 5 lakhs to the defendants.
remaining amount will be paid after the lokadalat compromise.
2. the defendants are also agreed and they are compromised in the lokadalat on the above said date.
3.the amount perticulars are not mentioned in the lokadalat petition.
4.now the plaintiffs not binding to the agreement condition they are now saying that after the mutation on the revenue records then we will pay the remaining amount to you.
5.original bond paper with the mediators only xerox copy along with me.
6.they (PLAINTIFFS) approached the MRO with the ORDER COPY OF LOKADALAT FOR MUTATION.
Q1.AT PRESENT STAGE CAN WE GIVE LEGAL NOTICE TO THE MRO WITH XEROX COPY OF AGREEMENT FOR NOT TO MUTATE THE RECORDS.
Q2.BASED ON THIS AGREEMENT CAN APPROACH COURT FOR APPEAL.
THANK YOU SIR.

sandeep rane   07 February 2014 at 19:30

Fresh filling

we have withdrw earlier suit to file on the same cause of action with permission of court.

In earlier suit we had following parties:

1.a
2.b
3.c

In new suit we have following parties :

1.b person
2.c person
3.d person
4.e person
5.f person
6.g person
7.h person
8.i - society of building
9.j - police station
10.k - inspector of police station
11.l - inspector of police station
12.m - inspector of police station
13.n - statutory body owned by state
14.o - state.


all these parties are necessary to the suit & I want to know that before filling a fresh suit on the same cause of action Do we need to give prior notice to above parties If yes then to which and for before how many days and for what period of time and under which section ? Please state clearly I am confused on this because I have got different different opinion on this issue.

sandeep rane   07 February 2014 at 19:17

Fresh filling

We have withdrw our civil suit with the permission of court to file fresh on the same cause of action in 2012. court gives permission without prescribing any time limit.

we have not filed fresh till yet due to financial problem and legal aid did not provide proper aid to file suit .

now in 2014 to file suit fresh on same cause of action will we face any problem of limitation period ?

manoj   07 February 2014 at 18:33

Succession certificate

good evening sir,as my sister's husband expired 5 yrs ago nd for shares of 9 lacs in dmat acct. v filled a case for succession certificate nd court awarded a S.C. on the name of my sister nd her two childers one of them is minor nd fourth her mother n law.now problem is that for 4 persons cant held a dmat account so how can v sell or transfre those shares .please advise me sir.

GANGAM.RAJENDER.   07 February 2014 at 18:25

Agreement amount not paid ,lok adalat appeal possible

respected experts,
the lokadalat case has been compromised on dated 23-nov-2013.
before the lokadalat the parties compromised with the conditions were written on the (100 rs) bond paper.
1.the plaintiffs are agreed to pay 28 lakhs to the defendants for compromise and they initially paid 5 lakhs to the defendants.
remaining amount will be paid after the lokadalat compromise.
2. the defendants are also agreed and they are compromised in the lokadalat on the above said date.
3.the amount perticulars are not mentioned in the lokadalat petition.
4.now the plaintiffs not binding to the agreement condition they are now saying that after the mutation on the revenue records then we will pay the remaining amount to you.
5.original bond paper with the mediators only xerox copy along with me.
6.they (PLAINTIFFS) approached the MRO with the ORDER COPY OF LOKADALAT FOR MUTATION.
Q1.AT PRESENT STAGE CAN WE GIVE LEGAL NOTICE TO THE MRO WITH XEROX COPY OF AGREEMENT FOR NOT TO MUTATE THE RECORDS.
Q2.BASED ON THIS AGREEMENT CAN APPROACH COURT FOR APPEAL.
THANK YOU SIR.

Anonymous   07 February 2014 at 16:32

How to get eviction order from court

Dear Sir, I have given one shop on rent agreement of 12 months. Now I want to vacate it for my personal use, now tell me the process as my tanent is not agreeing on my request and asking for compansation...Sir I am Mrs.Jayanti Pandey, working as Teacher in Lucknow.

SANKET UPADHYAY   07 February 2014 at 15:47

Interem injuction

CAN WE FILE INTEREM INJUCTION APPLICATION AT THE TIME OF FILING A SUIT? HOW?

Chatrapati   07 February 2014 at 12:28

section 41[d] of bombay public trust act 1950 (civil law)

can non member of educational trust file application for remove of trustees u/s 41[d] of Bombay public trust Act?

SANKET UPADHYAY   07 February 2014 at 12:23

Jurisdiction of civil judge junior devision

up to which amount civil judge junior division can hear matter?