Anonymous
29 June 2017 at 16:09
A purchased property in the year of 1940 and she had 4 daughters and she died on 1949. B is husband of A And executed gift deed in the year of 1968 in favour of A 's first daughter inrespect of A's property. Now A's other daughters filed partition suit against A's first daughter. So what relief for A's first daughter.
Aditya Dev
29 June 2017 at 15:22
In our case the plaintiff in his plaint has not produced any documents which supports his claim of amount owed to him by us. We are the defendants in this case. Now he is seeking to file additional documents which are statements of account to justify his claim at the stage of rejoinder.
My question is: Can the plaintiff file additional documents at the stage of rejoinder when he never submitted those along with his plaint and did not produce any reason for such delay.
Even Or. 7 R 14 is very clear that documents on which you place reliance should only be filed along with plaint except when you have sufficient cause for the delay. In our case he has no reason for delay.
It would be helpful to get his claim thrownout as the only document he has is the statement which he is filing now??
Munish Kumar
29 June 2017 at 14:04
MY MOTHER GAVE 1.5 LAC CASH TO A PERSON ON INTEREST BASIS BUT NOW HE IS NEITHER PAYING INTEREST NOR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT. WE HAVE A BLANK SIGNED CHEQUE HAVING NO DATE AND AMOUNT. CAN WE PUT A CHEQUE BOUNCE CASE ON THAT PERSON. KINDLY REPLY. .
rana
29 June 2017 at 13:17
whether the department can file w.p. against the order of CAT which has already been accepted and implemented by the department?
mahesh
28 June 2017 at 09:27
Sir, we had a land of 2.38 cents . We sold 1.85 cents in that land as we have debt. Document writer doesn't change boundaries as my father is illiterate. Now, we have applied for survey. We paid challan 2 times . It's already 8th year. Can we put a case in the consumer court ?.
ompreeth
28 June 2017 at 08:48
Sir,
i have purchase the land from my vendor by going through all necessary document, wherein in the year 1998 partition suit field by his vendor and allowed later in the year some other heirs field and allowed and in Finale decree proceeding get comprised. later in the year 2013 some one legal heir field again partition suit claiming for partition and injuncation, which is not in the notice of my vendor and to me and i purchased the property. now they imp-leaded in the suit and field my written statement. but now they are interfering with my peaceful possession can i file injuncation suit against them.
regards
ompreeth
Ritesh Rathod
27 June 2017 at 20:36
Dear sir
I file a consumer complain agaonst mobile company along with supporting evidence with list of documents. Now the matter is on the stage of arguments. Consumer forum not give the exhibit numbers to the documents produce with the list i.e copy of bill of mobile etc... Forum given number all other thing i.e. main complain affidavite list of documents etc. except documents produce with list. Might be due to not giving application for giving exhibit numbers. What should i do?
Mihir Joglekar
27 June 2017 at 12:36
Dear Sir / Madam,
The undersigned resides in Cooperative Housing Society located in Pune, MH. One night slab of our parking lot crashed which costed me Rs. 30,000 /- (Approx.) for the repairs of the damaged caused to my Car. As it was insured I claimed Insurance and received also.
Later, I made an application to the Managing Committee to get it repaired. But, the Managing Committee clearly denied saying that it was your Car Parking Slab of your Lot and you have to get it repaired from your own pocket, Sinking Fund of the Society cannot be used. My queries are as follows :
1) For what exactly Sinking Fund is charged & later can be used ?
2) What action can i take in this issue ?
Thanking You,
Sincerely Yours,
Mihir Joglekar
atulasi
27 June 2017 at 12:04
Hi Sir/Madam,
In 2009, our land case given the priliminary decrement by the district court on my favour . My opponents were calm during that time, But when we apply for the final decrement after 3 years, they asked for the objection on this, Since the time 90 days is crossed the court didnt give them the chance. But During the time they went to High court regarding this. Is the court allow like this for them?. What are the chances for me to get the favour again ?. Since it it difficult for us to spend money again on this. Already in lower court it went for 9 years.Any time limit is there ? I belong to Andhra pradesh. If you need any information also I will provide. Thanks in Advance
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Property matter in the court
Dear Experts of the Forum,
Late Mrs. B gives her property to (1)Mrs. B, Mr. R R, Mrs. I and Mr. SPB, some property which was taken over by Government and amount is due will be shared by equally by above four persons. And (2) remaining land property ie Patta, Inam lands, tenancy land were given to Mr.SPB. Mr. RR and Mr. SPB are own brothers and Mr. RR is older to Mr. SPB
After the death of Mrs. B, Mr. RR immediately taken GPA from MR. SPB for (2) property and dealing with same, and because of practices in the family younger brother Mr. SPB never asked about deals /deeds done by his elder brother Mr. RR in regards to the (2) property even about property (1) also.
In a case where a land was given to Army for lease and dispute rose between a third party Mr. NRS ,about the owner ship of this land, Mr.RR without consulting Mr.SPB had entered in to compromise ( compromise condition is not there in GPA given)with the third party Mr. NRS in the High court in 40: 60(third party Mr. NRS ) sharing basis (In this 40%, Mr.RR included the names of A , B, C, D, E, F, who are nowhere connected with will of Mrs. B or the (2) property…. Now both Mr. RR & Mr. SPB have died.
Mr. SPB gave all the property that had come to him to his daughter Mrs. PS. After the deathMr.SPB we found that there is some discriprency in the will (ie that the third party Mr. NRS, with whom Mr. RR entered in to compromise is wrong on two counts. ONE is false interpretation of the document, the third party having; TWO is, GPA do not contain the permission to compromise and that too GPA holder has taken 6 more un concernd persons along with him in the compromise petition.) .Without knowing these facts Mr. SPB in his ‘WILL’ state that Mrs. PS will have ¼ share in 40% of the compromised property.
Now this third party Mr. NRS argues that Mr.SPB is binding to this compromise agreement.
I request Experts of the Forum, to kindly help me, by suggesting the way out for this problem.