Kavya B Shashidhar
03 July 2017 at 11:48
Question: When an application to advance a particular case is made under section 151 of CPC, what are the circumstances when the said application NEED NOT BE SERVED on the opposite party?
Greetings,
In a certain case of permanent injunction wherein an interim order was granted, an advance application was made by me. The said case was for first hearing. Due to a technical error, an advance application was made before the court believing the case is at summons stage. So copies were not served to the opposite counsels.
Subsequently on the next date the court ordered that copies be served on the opposite counsel. Now on approaching them, they refuse to acknowledge the application submitted by us.
Any help on how to proceed further with this case would be very much appreciated.
Thank you.
-Regards
Kavya
Bhumika
03 July 2017 at 06:25
My uncle was declared abscond in 2004 by the court. Can his wife and son claim a share of ancestral property of my uncle? As he is not heared from more than 7 years as per the section 108 evidence act .
AJIT KAWATKAR
02 July 2017 at 22:35
Serving testamentary citations in Mumbai is handled by office of sheriff . Since we paid huge ( rs 75000/-) as probate fees it was presumed that it covers the fees for belief's service .Ground situation is that the belief is not ready to serve citations unless paid for which is unrealistic
Tried to get facts from court ,sachivalaya but failed
Can anybody put highlight the facts for me & for public in general .
Gopalacharyulu
02 July 2017 at 18:47
respected advocates,
My father passed away 11 months ago, he made a Will in self writing duly attested and with 2 witnesses singed. He grant his self acquired property's and assets to me ( 26 yrs) and to my elder brother ( 29) , we are two beneficiary's in that will. my mother is second wife to my father, they lived together for nearly 4 decades happily. My father's first wife deserted him long ago absconded my father with her only son ( my father's first marriage got him one son) just because he got TB. after that she filed a case in court and court ordered my father to pay monthly maintenance which he full filled perfectly until his demise.
My mother's name present in every legal document like ration card, aadhaar card, pension ( which she is getting now) , my father wrote in his Will that " my first wife and her son should not get any rupee because they are not present when i mostly needed them ( when he got TB). So at any cost my two children ( me and my brother) should be my legal heirs". we got legal heir certificate after his demise.my questions are:-
1st Q:- will there be any legal problem as my mother is second wife even though my father made sure we should get everything?
2nd Q:- we have a house but it is still in my fathers name, is there any problems arise from that point? should we change it ?
chandrababu
02 July 2017 at 09:35
Hi all
my wife put in case 498a in 2010 but that's falls case court is declining 2012. I got marriage in 2009 after 2010 still know my not leave with me I asking divorce she not agree. My planning going to onther marriage plz tell me what to do in leagle
P RaviShankar-cell-8939332195
02 July 2017 at 07:29
Sir, I gave rupees 5000 to an advocate to appear for me in a criminal case. He came late on one occasion and never appeared on second occasion and I stopped him from the case. He never gave me any consultation nor appeared for me even on a single occasion. Now when I asked him to return the fees he says professional fees cannot be returned. I'm shocked and stunned. Should I go for police complaint or should I complaint to bar council. Please help me
Nabasaheb Suryawanshi
02 July 2017 at 06:34
Is any one having copy of judgement of Bombay High Court, in case of Testamentary Petition No 595 of 2005, Yallappagauda Shankar Rao v/s Smt. Yallappagauda Manjunatha Rao.
Adv Nanasaheb Suryawanshi 9325118204
advt Mukunda muniyappa
01 July 2017 at 11:35
I hv filed a petition in family. The respondent is in jail. How to serve a summon and under what provision
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Co-opt member option
Dear Sir / Madam,
I understand that as per Recent Changes in MCS Act, 1960 and Bye Laws of Cooperative Housing Society U/s: 73CB Co-option not allowed. But, Managing Committee Members are still allowing Co-opt Member to attend Managing Committee Meetings. What necessary steps / action can be taken about / against this issue ?
Regards,
Mihir Joglekar