Anonymous
01 July 2017 at 07:31
At a Trustees meeting (a Public Trust, duly registered with the Charity Commissioner, Mumbai) , there were only three Trustees present (quorum being 3). The Chairman of the Trust was absent due to illness and one of the Trustees took the Chair.
A topic on the Agenda was appointment of additional Trustees.
The Chairman of the meeting demanded that this matter be taken up and resolved at this very meeting as it was on the Agenda.
He PROPOSED the name of his SON IN LAW (husband of his daughter, and understandably residing in his very same house when in Mumbai- he has given his permanent address as Pune) to be a Trustee.
One of the other Trustees objected vehemently that being a Public Trust it is incorrect for it to be slowly converted into a "family run Trust" by inducting a son in law (who incidentally has never met the two other Trustees)- the Chairman wanted a blind vote on this.
And that in any case, the Chairman of the meeting, being an interested party and a direct family member of the applicant had no right to be voting on an "interested candidate as a son-in-law".
This was overruled by the Chair so the opposing Trustee stated that he was AGAINST SUCH AN APPOINTMENT unless the Chairman of the meeting stayed away from the voting as an INTERESTED PARTY>
Without the contents of the Resolution being drafted, read out and put to vote the Chairman, stated that by a 2-1 majority (his own vote and that of the third Trustee) the Resolution had been passed and that his SON IN LAW was now a Trustee for LIFE. My objection was heard but I do not know if my views/ objection will find its way into the Minutes which I presume will come weeks if not months later.
I seek the valued views of our Legal Experts on the panel as I dread that this is the first stage in the creeping takeover of the Trust by this Trustee and his family- the Trust has large holdings in property and assets.
I look forward to such views.
sajoli
01 July 2017 at 01:43
Dear Seniors,
I am vendor of this Pvt Ltd Hospitality company, i am working for this company since last 1 year initially they cleared my dues immediately but after some time they started doing late payment and now suddenly they stop reverting on my mail, phone call, now I thought to file sammary suit against them to recover my outstanding, but they run there business in all the rental property.
Please guide.
Sankaran
30 June 2017 at 19:39
My CHS refuses permission to me for giving my Flat on Leave and License to following categories of :
----- Bacholors
---- For use as Company Guest house /Transit house
----- Working women on shareable basis
--- as Service Apartment
Kindly let me know if they can enforce these conditions legally
Regards
Chandra
Humendra Gupta
30 June 2017 at 15:50
I got registrar to issue Administrator order against coop society.. they appealed to minister and high court against it. Minister dismissed their appeal and high court case 6786/2017 also disposed based on minister order. HC gave two week time to appeal Minister order. Society now filed case wpst/17633/2017 on 28/6. Not sure what is coram registrar (judichial) mean. Please help me understand and what I need to do .. this needs to be dismissed at this initial stage based on hon Minister and Registrar orders
Need to file to intervene in case
Aditya Dev
30 June 2017 at 12:57
I am a contractor employed by my employer. I sub-contract the work to a third party. Now the work is completed and we have to pay them. The work was completed on 2014 - December. Now the sub-contractor is demanding payment as the limitation is almost at its end. So I (Contractor) release part of the total amount and send a letter tot he subcontractor which says that we will pay the rest of the amount when the employer pays to us. Therefore our making payment to subcontractor is conditional upon we getting paid by the employer.
What i want is the opinion on:
1 - Whether can we be covered under section 18 of the Limitaion Act?
2 - Is there any way to get out of the scope of this provision?
3- Is there any judgement which accepts such condition?
because there are judgements where the courts have accepted the conditions but then the conditions are related to arbitration or when one party wants to check the accounts. I found no judgement which allows the release of payment from the employer as a condition.
Any and all replies would be appreciated.
Thank you.
Read more at: http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/ask_query.asp
mahesan
30 June 2017 at 11:56
A purchased property in the year of 1940 and she had 4 daughters and she died on 1949. B is husband of A And executed gift deed in the year of 1968 in favour of A 's first daughter inrespect of A's property. Now A's other daughters filed partition suit against A's first daughter. So what relief for A's first daughter.
Ahmed
30 June 2017 at 00:44
hey everyone i want to hire a advocate in mumbai because as i stay in hyderabad i dont know anyone there. so if you guys can help me out in this i will be very glad.thx
Member (Account Deleted)
29 June 2017 at 23:08
My family and me have been staying in a flat for above 15 years. My father could not register the flat due to *stay* brought in that area. After the *stay* passed we tried to register but the builder always avoided it after that we were facing some serious financial issues so we could not register the flat.
The builder sold the flat to some other party. The other party, least concerned about everything, did not even care to enquire if anyone stays in the flat or how big or small the flat is purchased the flat. The builder also got the flat registered on the other party's name.
To solve this issue we spoke to the builder, the builder replied that he was sorry for all this and he would himself come and cancel the other partys registration and would re register the flat in the our name. The fraud builder fled away making promises. The other party trespassed our house with 15 people who were strangers. I cried for help but the trespassers closed all the doors and windows. They hit my father and threw the furniture outside the house. I filed an FIR against the other party and the trespassers. We also filed a case in the Civil court against the other party. We have a purchase agreement, possession certificate, bills bearing our name since 2000. The only problem is that we did not register the flat.
What are the chances that we can win the case?
Is there any law which states that the flat belongs to the one who has been staying in the property for years?
Can the police interfere in property matter even when A civil proceeding is going on against the other party and the disputed flat? Is it legal?
Is it legal that the other party can get all the bills of the property ( maintenance, gas, electricity) renamed in his own name even if there is a civil proceeding going on against him and the disputed flat?
Can the society issue share certificate to a person if there is a civil proceeding going on against the person asking for a share certificate and the disputed flat?
What are the chances to win the case?
Anonymous
29 June 2017 at 18:10
Hi All,
i have filed a cheque bounce in the month of feb-2016 and i have been cross examined by accused side lawyer for couple of times and the honourable judge was taken the statement (I also explained i will provide Form 16 if required), so after 17months accused opened the 420 case against me and now my lawyer was asking me to take Anticipatory bail which would cost me 25k (my lawyer told me), i was already spent 25k for all the things.
is it really necessity to take anticipatory bail?
If genuinely accused person opened the 420 case what i supposed to get from Police station (Like Call/text) or FIR copy.
I am really frustrated about way case is running (its just running running), so i am planning to close the case, will that affect 420 case if it is genuine.
Thanks,
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
E p
Respected Sir/Madam I got exparty Judgement.In this case defendants approach by their lawyer and file VAKALTHA.They did not file Written statement in time.then court said exparty .Now defendants file pettion(IA) exactly at 180th day after judgment .Now I Can File E P