Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
15 June 2008 at 06:36
As per Hindu Succession Act,1956 sec.2of sub.sec.2.the provision of that act will apply to member of Scheduled Tribe whitin the meaning of Clause 25 of Article 366 of the Constitution of India?
ASHUTOSH
14 June 2008 at 11:00
dear sir pls solve this problem
i have file a simple recovery suit on the behalf of pvt ltd company, at the time of leading evidence defendant had taken plea that witness canot depose the evidence because the board resulation is favore of MR, X Managindirector and he furthere to authorized MR Y as A.R. he has taken plea on the judgement of appexe court Jankidevi Bhojwani V/S Ind SIND BANK . secondely he raise objection resolution pass in year 2000 case is file on 2008 that means in 2000 no cause of action in favore of the plaintiff against defendants. we have a simple one resolution which we use in every case. i want to know (a) does Board resolution has expire date (b) does we need for each and every case a seprate board resolution pls educate me on this subject
Raja Sundarraman
13 June 2008 at 22:10
Respected Learned Friends, recommend artcles on land administation in TamilNadu since 1900.Thanks.
jhanvi
13 June 2008 at 10:39
Dear Sir,
As far as my knowqledge says the investigation has been closed and chargesheet against has been released against them from both the police station (Panigate and Karellibaug). They had also applied for the bail on base of FIR in the local court which was rejected and then they also applied on base of the chargesheet which also got rejected. the sharebroker ansd his son who are involved in this case have also applied for the bail which recently got accepted.Now the two victims whoes bail got rejected from local court are trying to apply to the high court and are even thinking to fight the case against the company. Kindly guide us what can be done the current situation. should they apply for the bail as once it has already got rejected from the local court. or they should fight the case against the company? Will that case get resolve within six months of opening as that is what promised by our advocate. Kindly guide.
Regards,
Jhanvi.
VINOD JINDAL
13 June 2008 at 09:08
i want to take the attention of all the advocates community to the vary surprising topic to me or to all of us regarding the bank's credit card and personal loan policy THAT AN ADVOCATE CAN NOT GET THE CREDIT CARD AND PERSONAL LOAN any body except an advocate can get these facielites. I think it is shameful for all of us and we have to take this matter seriously becouse we all are also the councils of various banks
Bharat
11 June 2008 at 22:03
MY SISTER-IN-LAW HAD DEVELOPED BREST CANCER AND GOT OPERATED IN RAJIV GANDHI CANCER HOSPITAL IN HER RIGHT BREST. AFTER THE OPERATION SHE WAS DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL AND AFTER SOME TIME A NEW CANCER TISSUES HAD BEEN FOUND IN HER LEFT BREST.SHE WAS NOT AGREE TO BE OPERATED IN THE RAJIV GANDHI HOSPITAL AGIAN SO SHE TURNED TO A AURVEDIC HOSPIATL IN LUCKNOW WHERE SHE REMAIN ADMITTED FOR TWO MONTH AND PAID ABOUT 5 LAKH RS FOR THE TREATMENT. BEFORE THE TREATMENT THE DOCTORS OF THE SAID HOSPITAL HAD GIVEN THE ASSURANCE THAT IF ANY PATIENT OF CANCER WOULD BE TREATED IN THEIR HOSPITAL HE OR SHE WOULD BE ALRIGHT. DURING TWO MONTH STAY IN THE HOSPITAL THEY EXAMINED HER MINUTELY AND DECLAR IMPROVEMENT EVERYTIME. SHE RETRUNED DELHI AND THE DOCTORS OF RAJIV GANDHI,DHARMSHEELA AND EVEN AIIMS DECLARED HER LAST STAGE WHICH WAS VERY HARRASMENT FOR HER. THAN MY BROTHER-IN-LAW TOOK HER IN CHANDIGARH BUT IN VAIN. ON 9TH MAY SHE TOOK A STEP TO END HER LIFE AND REMAIN SUCCESSFUL. SHE IS NO MORE IN THIS WORLD. HOW CAN I GET THESE DOCTORS OF AURVEDIC HOSPITAL PUNISHED SO THAT THEY WILL NOT PLAY WITH THE LIFE OF OTHERS FOR THE SHAKE OF MONEY. PLEASE REPLY FOR THE SHAKE OF HUMANKING. THANKS
Bharat
11 June 2008 at 22:03
MY SISTER-IN-LAW HAD DEVELOPED BREST CANCER AND GOT OPERATED IN RAJIV GANDHI CANCER HOSPITAL IN HER RIGHT BREST. AFTER THE OPERATION SHE WAS DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL AND AFTER SOME TIME A NEW CANCER TISSUES HAD BEEN FOUND IN HER LEFT BREST.SHE WAS NOT AGREE TO BE OPERATED IN THE RAJIV GANDHI HOSPITAL AGIAN SO SHE TURNED TO A AURVEDIC HOSPIATL IN LUCKNOW WHERE SHE REMAIN ADMITTED FOR TWO MONTH AND PAID ABOUT 5 LAKH RS FOR THE TREATMENT. BEFORE THE TREATMENT THE DOCTORS OF THE SAID HOSPITAL HAD GIVEN THE ASSURANCE THAT IF ANY PATIENT OF CANCER WOULD BE TREATED IN THEIR HOSPITAL HE OR SHE WOULD BE ALRIGHT. DURING TWO MONTH STAY IN THE HOSPITAL THEY EXAMINED HER MINUTELY AND DECLAR IMPROVEMENT EVERYTIME. SHE RETRUNED DELHI AND THE DOCTORS OF RAJIV GANDHI,DHARMSHEELA AND EVEN AIIMS DECLARED HER LAST STAGE WHICH WAS VERY HARRASMENT FOR HER. THAN MY BROTHER-IN-LAW TOOK HER IN CHANDIGARH BUT IN VAIN. ON 9TH MAY SHE TOOK A STEP TO END HER LIFE AND REMAIN SUCCESSFUL. SHE IS NO MORE IN THIS WORLD. HOW CAN I GET THESE DOCTORS OF AURVEDIC HOSPITAL PUNISHED SO THAT THEY WILL NOT PLAY WITH THE LIFE OF OTHERS FOR THE SHAKE OF MONEY. PLEASE REPLY FOR THE SHAKE OF HUMANKIND. THANKS
jhanvi
10 June 2008 at 12:43
Dear Experts,
This is my query in reference to the CMS ATM CASE happened in vadodara wherein the victims are blamed for the fraud of 1 crore. Want to know about the future of this case. Also if u can guide whether they can be released through bail request or intrim bail in High Court. Requesting your kind comments on it.
Thanks & Regards,
Jhanvi
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
09 June 2008 at 07:34
if a registered owner parts with the possession of the vehicle in favour of the person, who has purchased the vehicle ,the registered owner still remains the owner of the vehicle even if he cases to have control and pessession of the vehicle. AS a corollary thereto ,the person, who may have purchased the vehicle ,but has not got his name registered as ownervof the vehicle,shall not be regarded ,for the purpose of sec.168, as owner of vehicle ,though such a presons may have the control and possession of the vehicle.In such a case ,if the vehicle stood insured,the insurer would be liable to pay compensation to the claimant,notwithstanding the fact the registered owner has sold the vehicle and the same has not been registered in the name of the purchaser?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
amendment in plaint
can amendment in plaint be allowed at the stage of second appeal.